Mark 9:47-49 “And if your eye is sinful, gouge it out. Better enter the Kingdom of God half blind than have two eyes and see the fires of hell, where the worm never dies, and the fire never goes out— where all are salted with fire.
You don't have an issue with me, but scripture. Jesus spoke of Hell more than Heaven as a warning. Why did he do this if death was oblivion?
So you went from being a catholic to a JW who apparently believe 144, 000 are going to be saved. Are all those seats booked yet? Or can people still get a reservation?
Jesus means Savior (a lot more appropriate than a rhetorical question.) My brother is named Michael, btw. I'll be sure to let him know your opinion of his exalted status due to his name!
What difference does it make if the JWs are preaching worldwide if their view of Scripture is corrupt? Heck, the middle east is still dominated by Islam. Does that mean they're right because of their numbers?
Luke 21: 8-11
He replied, “Don’t let anyone mislead you. For many will come announcing themselves as the Messiah, and saying, ‘The time has come.’ But don’t believe them! And when you hear of wars and insurrections beginning, don’t panic. True, wars must come, but the end won’t follow immediately— for nation shall rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be great earthquakes, and famines in many lands, and epidemics, and terrifying things happening in the heavens.
So again, the words of Christ Himself debunk the "secret second coming" JWs believe in.
The whole purpose of Jesus showing Himself with the marks of His Crucifixion was to prove He had been raised in the SAME body. Why on earth would He raise Himself from the dead and change bodies like a suit of clothes? It's beyond absurd at best and downright laughable at worst!
Again the term 'Jehovah Witnesses' are not in the bible. By your world view this negates the use of the term. I think you ought to call yourselves something else. Otherwise, are you not being tainted by the same "Babylonian" influences you accuse everyone else of? Consider it. Can't use the term Christmas, Easter....none of them are in the bible. What makes Russell's term more acceptable? Is it just the fact that you must obey whatever is commanded by your cult leader?