It's too late for the independent candidates. They should have started their campaigns much sooner if they wanted to make any difference at all. I'm sure they're fine people and might have made good political leaders, but I think the choice has now been narrowed down to two.
There have been many times in the past when we have to pick someone who is not necessarily the "best in show", but is still the best we have to choose from right now.
I understand wanting to pick an independent. I really do. But at this point if you pick one of them, I would venture to say that you are inadvertently voting for Hillary Clinton and that's too bad, isn't it? My freedoms are important to me and I'd like to not lose them in my lifetime or my children's.
The independents DID start their campaign early, just as early as the rest of them. They just didn't get any support or air time. They couldn't be in the debates because they weren't Republican or Democrat, but someone in the media should have wanted fairness (I'm kidding. There is no fairness in the media) and held independent debates.
Gary Johnson has tried to beak the barrier before and didn't succeed. Voters aren't really aware of all the political parties in this country because they don't get any attention from the media. They only know 2, 3 at the most.
Gary Johnson is a little too much of an isolationist for me. I do agree with some of his ideas, but the last isolationist president "created" our entry into WWII. In fact, you could almost say Obama is an isolationist because he doesn't try to stop any country with aggressive behaviors. Case in point is China and Russia. Look what they are doing. Same with Syria. If he would have held to the "red line," I doubt the ME would be in such a mess today.