do you thing the military shoud be alound to arm then self

[countrygirl12]

carrying gun is allowed  according to the consistution. if you take away my right to bear arms, why do i support or should support the rest of it
. Any way, all the times, I have been hurt, attacked on the job, was because my employer tells me I can not carry weapons, not even pepper spray.
Obama  is taking away freedom of speech, soon there will be a police state. 
zHeil!!

You have been attacked and hurt on the job more than one time?

[linderlizzie]

Pathetic that you are too lazy to preview your post   It doesn't matter that we can figure out what you are asking, it matters that you seem to have the grammar and spelling skills of a 1st grader UNREAL thing, alound , then self,  Unless you are drunk this is sad

One thing I really like about Fusion Cash is that no one seems to bash one another. 

This post is pretty harsh when you don't know BigEd's circumstances. There could be any number of reasons why his spelling is not that great. Number one of which, he's a man  and many of them don't care quite as much about spelling and grammar.

Let's not act like a bunch of Facebook attackers and keep it nice over here at FC.  Pretty please.

[Sendmicheck]

I agree, they should allow to bare harm for better protection.  History, should not repeat itself again if the right decision is make.

[Sadie2426]

i think that if everyone was arm :sad1:ed that were bot felons,  it would be safer

[paynesponies]

yes, right to arms is allowed in our  US constitution

[JD818]

I think they should be allowed to, and should have been before hand to stop something like that from happening...