This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print
Pages: 1

Topic: inferior printers  (Read 422 times)

Gerianne

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 2621 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 35x
inferior printers
« on: June 24, 2013, 06:29:29 am »
Comparing HP to Canon printers, Canon rates better.
HP is inferior.
Logged

tinaryerson

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 15x
Re: inferior printers
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2013, 06:34:36 am »
Oh, i thought it said inferior painters at first.  So i don't know what to say now.
Logged

Forp

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Elite Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 984 (since 2012)
  • Thanked: 14x
Re: inferior printers
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2013, 06:39:05 am »
My hp didnot work right of the box...traded it in for a lexmark... a "basic" meaning cheap model ...forget about it  :dontknow:
Logged

southernhorizons

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 2914 (since 2008)
  • Thanked: 57x
Re: inferior printers
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2013, 07:56:24 am »
I had an HP printer that was really great. When it finally wore out, I got another one, a cheap one from Walmart, and it gave me trouble from the start. I got a Canon printer, and it works good, but it only takes genuine Canon ink, so it gets pretty expensive. At least the HP printers take the cheap remanufactured ink.
Logged

dwggs

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 2701 (since 2009)
  • Thanked: 63x
Re: inferior printers
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2013, 08:31:50 am »
I have used HP Printers for years and have never had a problem.
Logged
*Image Removed*
  • Print
Pages: 1
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
898 Views 		Last post October 14, 2013, 11:25:30 am
by bob1tina