This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print

Topic: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)  (Read 4081 times)

jcribb16

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 5309 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 72x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2012, 05:57:04 pm »
I wonder sometimes if people who call Christians hypocritical and mean realize that many of the "self-described" Christians are not really Christians.  I think some of these people are really NOT Christian.  They just want to use the title to prove they are better than most other people.  Their actions prove the opposite.
Good points, for sure...

Flackle

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556 (since 2011)
  • Thanked: 9x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2012, 03:39:29 pm »
I think some Christians think that whats for most Americans is not for them and at same time think they are so precious of the lords word they will never do wrong. When in reality most Christians are hypocrites and God is not their main worship.

Sadly, I have to agree with you on that point.  Some of my family members have joined fundamental churches in recent years.  It's really difficult to be around their holier than thou attitude at times.  It's also pretty depressing to see people self-identify as Christians and then spew pure venom at people who disagree with their views.

Unfortunately, it happens on both sides of the fence.  A little acceptance can go a long way with kindness when both sides understand that both sides have their own personal choices and views, and that it's okay to believe or disbelieve, according to each individual's choice.  

[sarcasm] Exactly. We shouldn't be debating because we need to realize that everyone has their own opinions. There is not such thing as a wrong opinion, and we should not make any attempts at uncovering the truth. Because frankly, if we start to actually argue we could offend someone. And not offending someone is way more important that trying to understand the truth. [/sarcasm]
Discussing and debating is fine - I have no issues with that.  I do have issues when it becomes so heated and mean [/b that there is no listening to either side, which means nothing provided is accepted nor listened to.  There's a difference.  Add sarcasm in, and others know the sarcastic ones have no interest in debating as much as they do agitating.  

I think sarcasm is appropriate, when you are suggesting we should use the "offensiveness" of someone's post to justify censoring and ignoring them simply because they have an opinion that's not yours. There is no objective way to measure meanness. I find religion and its beliefs to be extremely offensive to human intellect as a whole, but I don't whine about it. I simply debate and disagree with it, and occasionally ridicule it because, at least to me, religion is ridiculous.

The fact alone that I am debating at all should be enough evidence that I actually care about your opinion, and I wish to discuss your beliefs in comparison to mine.
Many people disagree about what "whining" means, also.  Sarcasm is not always necessary when others are being sincere with what they are saying, believing, and/or meaning.  Debating and discussing are one thing, but sarcasm, when used just to agitate or make someone look like an idiot, only makes the sarcastic one look like someone who isn't wanting to genuinely discuss the issue or topic.  

I don't expect everyone to believe as I do, nor should anyone expect others to believe as they do.  However, there are some who really do think their way is the only way, period, and get angry when people disagree.  Those are the ones who have an issue with accepting that not everyone believes the same, and there's just no debating, discussing, nor arguing with them about it - it's a waste of time and effort.

Of course whining is also subjective, but I also have never suggested that those who whine shouldn't post, either. Are you also suggesting that I should only be sarcastic when other people are being sarcastic?

As for the second bolded statement, well of course people think that their opinions are right. Everyone should think that their opinions are right. The entire point of debating is trying to figure out whose opinion is actually right, and is actually based on reality and which opinions are wrong. Just because you can't convince other people that your opinion is the right one doesn't mean that it's useless to debate against them. The point of debate isn't just to convince someone that your way is the right way, its about reflecting  to try and determine the one that best fits reality. Its a form of personal growth, in which you not only question other people's beliefs but yours as well. If someone else is so affirmed in their beliefs that they didn't even reconsider them, then that's fine. Its what you take from that debate that was important, not how convincing you where to the other person.

jcribb16

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 5309 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 72x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2012, 08:08:51 pm »
"Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; an argument an exchange of ignorance."
~ Robert Quillen ~

"The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress."
~ Joseph Joubert ~

"God ceases to be God only for those who can admit the possibility of His non-existence, and that conception is in itself the most severe punishment they can suffer."
~ Giacomo Casanova ~

Falconer02

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 3106 (since 2009)
  • Thanked: 90x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2012, 10:56:54 pm »
Quote
"Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; an argument an exchange of ignorance."

Religion is based upon the ignorance of reality (when one values mythology as reality), so any discussion about reality and religion automatically becomes ignorant from the side that values ignorance. I might be wrong, but I assume you still believe the bible is inerrant or infallible even though I demonstrated it is numerous times.

Quote
The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress

And yet religious people still believe in ancient mythology and (usually) refuse to broaden their perspective. That is not progress. That is ignorance.

Quote
God ceases to be God only for those who can admit the possibility of His non-existence, and that conception is in itself the most severe punishment they can suffer.

This account does not take into consideration the other potential gods from other religions so, again, argument from ignorance/false dichotomy.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2012, 12:25:38 am by Falconer02 »

Flackle

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556 (since 2011)
  • Thanked: 9x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2012, 06:21:15 am »
"Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; an argument an exchange of ignorance."
~ Robert Quillen ~

"The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress."
~ Joseph Joubert ~

"God ceases to be God only for those who can admit the possibility of His non-existence, and that conception is in itself the most severe punishment they can suffer."
~ Giacomo Casanova ~


The first quote totally wrong. Everything we do in the debate and discuss forum IS an argument. There is nothing bad about arguments, and blaming arguments themselves for acts of violence or anger is like blaming nuclear disasters on physics.

The second quote is actually true. In fact, its pretty much what I stated in my last post.

The last quote is 100% wrong on almost all facets. It assumes reality is what people make it out to be, and that's just not the case. The very definition of reality is that it is, regardless of what we believe. Are you suggesting, assuming that there is a god, that simply because an athiest doesn't believe in god that they wont be affected by the existence of that god?

batmobile

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Silver Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1071 (since 2011)
  • Thanked: 26x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #20 on: December 19, 2012, 08:00:22 pm »
"Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; an argument an exchange of ignorance."
~ Robert Quillen ~

"The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress."
~ Joseph Joubert ~

"God ceases to be God only for those who can admit the possibility of His non-existence, and that conception is in itself the most severe punishment they can suffer."
~ Giacomo Casanova ~


The first quote totally wrong. Everything we do in the debate and discuss forum IS an argument. There is nothing bad about arguments, and blaming arguments themselves for acts of violence or anger is like blaming nuclear disasters on physics.

The second quote is actually true. In fact, its pretty much what I stated in my last post.

The last quote is 100% wrong on almost all facets. It assumes reality is what people make it out to be, and that's just not the case. The very definition of reality is that it is, regardless of what we believe. Are you suggesting, assuming that there is a god, that simply because an athiest doesn't believe in god that they wont be affected by the existence of that god?
i  bet  u  dont  understand the  bible  at  all...lol there  is  a  reason  they  say"devils  advocate" u  know 

Falconer02

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 3106 (since 2009)
  • Thanked: 90x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #21 on: December 19, 2012, 09:04:53 pm »
Quote
i  bet  u  dont  understand the  bible  at  all...lol there  is  a  reason  they  say"devils  advocate" u  know  

"Don't agree with me? YOU ARE FROM THE DEVIL!"
I urge you to realize most people that regard your beliefs as dangerous and illogical probably know much more about the bible than you do. Then again, why be intelligent when you can blame anything you don't agree with on a mythology's antagonist?
« Last Edit: December 19, 2012, 09:09:31 pm by Falconer02 »

Flackle

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556 (since 2011)
  • Thanked: 9x
Re: esoteric xtianity (was Re: Subforum suggestion)
« Reply #22 on: December 20, 2012, 05:46:40 pm »
"Discussion is an exchange of knowledge; an argument an exchange of ignorance."
~ Robert Quillen ~

"The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress."
~ Joseph Joubert ~

"God ceases to be God only for those who can admit the possibility of His non-existence, and that conception is in itself the most severe punishment they can suffer."
~ Giacomo Casanova ~


The first quote totally wrong. Everything we do in the debate and discuss forum IS an argument. There is nothing bad about arguments, and blaming arguments themselves for acts of violence or anger is like blaming nuclear disasters on physics.

The second quote is actually true. In fact, its pretty much what I stated in my last post.

The last quote is 100% wrong on almost all facets. It assumes reality is what people make it out to be, and that's just not the case. The very definition of reality is that it is, regardless of what we believe. Are you suggesting, assuming that there is a god, that simply because an athiest doesn't believe in god that they wont be affected by the existence of that god?
i  bet  u  dont  understand the  bible  at  all...lol there  is  a  reason  they  say"devils  advocate" u  know  

Well, since you seem to be an expert at the origins of the term, lets analyze it shall we?

"During the canonization process of the Roman Catholic Church, the Promoter of the Faith (Latin: promotor fidei), popularly known as the Devil's advocate (Latin: advocatus diaboli), was a canon lawyer appointed by Church authorities to argue against the canonization of a candidate. 1
"

So, essentially, the Devil's advocate was a holy man. This role they take was necessary, to keep any fraudulent miracles from assigning saintliness on someone undeserving of said title. I believe these people where very well fluent in the bible, and probably knew a great deal about it in order to actually do what they where assigned to do. A devil's advocate is some one, against their greater intentions, who looks past their own prejudice to contemplate an opposing viewpoint out of necessity.

Now, this doesn't describe me very well since I just flat out argue against your viewpoint.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil%27s_advocate1
« Last Edit: December 20, 2012, 05:49:35 pm by Flackle »

  • Print
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
Suggestion

Started by bgold in FusionCash

12 Replies
8873 Views
Last post February 28, 2008, 01:58:22 pm
by mcastillanes
30 Replies
11931 Views
Last post February 26, 2008, 11:03:52 pm
by mcastillanes
Suggestion

Started by Rafael3206 in Support

2 Replies
2571 Views
Last post September 09, 2007, 09:07:26 am
by Rafael3206
127 Replies
14886 Views
Last post November 14, 2012, 01:14:06 pm
by falcon9
1 Replies
1033 Views
Last post December 16, 2015, 10:08:10 pm
by oldbuddy