Like I said, you are going to think what you choose to think, period. You are holding today's Christians' responsible for something they did NOT do, nor do they approve of what those others did, using GOD'S NAME to achieve their personal vendettas of hatred of certain groups/types of people. This is exactly what you and another poster are doing as well - trying to achieve your personal vendettas of hatred toward Christians, today, who genuinely love the Lord, and love their "neighbors" as asked by Christ to do. The only thing you two have NOT done is getting rid of Christians' lives on here - thank goodness we have a computer screen in between.
Nowhere in any of my post did I implicitly nor implied that Christians of today are responsible for what Christians have done in the past. Such an idea is illogical and is not something I support.
I did say however that Christians in the past have done harm (and its obvious you agree to this) and that because they did such harm in the past that they have negatively impacted humanity as a whole. We are not trying to get rid of your lives, we are trying to make you see reason (a futile attempt at best, but we try.)
You are right and I apologize - the other poster has done that very thing so much that I was reacting as if you were saying the same thing he says.
I do agree about the past. The problem I have with them in the past, is the honest question of their intentions. If they were genuinely believers in Christ, who said the new and greatest commandment is to love everyone, then what or who gave them the right to do those things they did?
There was intolerance of certain behaviors and ideas, and it appears that many let their own personal intolerant feelings interfere in making a Godly decision with those situations. It seems they were believers in name only, but not in heart, and instead used God's name to do the things they did, thereby appeasing their consciences of any real and tragic wrongdoing.