"The Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim, ethical code, or morality that essentially states either of the following:
(Positive form of Golden Rule): One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.
(Negative form of Golden Rule): One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated.
This concept describes a "reciprocal", or "two-way", relationship between one's self and others that involves both sides equally, and in a mutual fashion." --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_RuleImplicitly, if others are initially rude/offensive, the "golden rule's positive maxim" suggests they be treated in kind.
You really seem as a petulant and pouty little old man who has to be the class "clown" and "troublemaker" ...
Contextually, you've inadvertently provided an example of hucking-up an initial insult and, under the auspices of the "golden rule", I'd be permitted to chuck one back. Or, I could choose not to.
... so no one will have the right to enjoy their own topics of things.
You're still trying those failed attempts as coersive censorship, are you? So, if some hypothetical member of FC "enjoyed" a topic that some hypothetical fundie objected to, they'd be able to post about it or not?
[/quote]
In other words ...
No, not in other words - the "golden rule's" versions were quoted.
This is ridiculous.
That's due to your irrationality which you apparently have no conscious control over.