Genesis 9:28-29 (The Living Bible)

[joannaingram84]

Noah lived another 350 years after the flood, and was 950 years old at his death.

[falcon9]

Noah lived another 350 years after the flood, and was 950 years old at his death.

You're spamming religious mythology and specious/unsupportable claims.

"You can not convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it is based on a deep-seated need to believe.”
-– Carl Sagan

[ben50]

They lived longer back then, look at how many ancestors
God created....Noah, then Abram, (Abraham) and so on goes the Line...

[falcon9]

They lived longer back then ...

Sure they did - because some unverifiable 'biblical source' says so, sans evidence?

“You can not convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it is based on a deep-seated need to believe.”
-– Carl Sagan

[inertia4]

Now that is a fallacy. I am sure no one lived to 950 years old. And besides, the bible is a fable. There is no solid proof any of that stuff really happened.

[JediJohnnie]

Now that is a fallacy. I am sure no one lived to 950 years old. And besides, the bible is a fable. There is no solid proof any of that stuff really happened.

Care to tell us why you seem to know this as fact?

[falcon9]

Now that is a fallacy. I am sure no one lived to 950 years old. And besides, the bible is a fable. There is no solid proof any of that stuff really happened.

Care to tell us why you seem to know this as fact?

Probably because the OP fundie didn't provide any evidence to support their longevity claim.

[marcar1008]

"PROBABLY"   a strong word there. 

[madeara]

Matthew 25:23
New International Version (NIV)
23 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’

[jcribb16]

Noah lived another 350 years after the flood, and was 950 years old at his death.

I just noticed, down at the bottom of my screen showing older posts, that you have been posting things from Genesis, in order from the beginning, at least since last year.  Once posted, you don't really come back in to discuss anything about it.  Someone may reply, but you don't even after that.  I guess that's why many stopped replying, and/or some have been questioning why you aren't continuing to discuss the topic of your verses that you post.   

[falcon9]

Noah lived another 350 years after the flood, and was 950 years old at his death.

I just noticed, down at the bottom of my screen showing older posts, that you have been posting things from Genesis, in order from the beginning, at least since last year.  Once posted, you don't really come back in to discuss anything about it.  Someone may reply, but you don't even after that.  I guess that's why many stopped replying, and/or some have been questioning why you aren't continuing to discuss the topic of your verses that you post.   

There's no question that these are merely religious proselytizing/thumping without the 'verse numbers'. They are also not contained within one thread but, are spread over many threads, like spamming.

[jcribb16]

Noah lived another 350 years after the flood, and was 950 years old at his death.

I just noticed, down at the bottom of my screen showing older posts, that you have been posting things from Genesis, in order from the beginning, at least since last year.  Once posted, you don't really come back in to discuss anything about it.  Someone may reply, but you don't even after that.  I guess that's why many stopped replying, and/or some have been questioning why you aren't continuing to discuss the topic of your verses that you post.   

There's no question that these are merely religious proselytizing/thumping without the 'verse numbers'. They are also not contained within one thread but, are spread over many threads, like spamming.

This is definitely one thing we do agree on.  Being contained in one thread, including "discussing" in your own thread, is one thing.  But when I actually looked how far back this has been going on, and noticed how they are spread out like that, with no discussion on her part, I couldn't resist questioning the reason behind it.  I totally agree with you on this.

[duroz]

[But when I actually looked how far back this has been going on, and noticed how they are spread out like that, with no discussion on her part, I couldn't resist questioning the reason behind it.  I totally agree with you on this.

She was doing the same thing with her continuing posts from a book until I POINTED out how could ANYONE follow along with the story if she started a new thread each time she posted a new excerpt from the book?
Then she said she couldn't find her posts to add on to them, and I told her she could look through her post history til she found it there.

(OK, yeah I probably did do that kinda bitc*ily, as it really irritated me)

But now she does post the book excerpts (I think?) in one thread.

[jcribb16]

[But when I actually looked how far back this has been going on, and noticed how they are spread out like that, with no discussion on her part, I couldn't resist questioning the reason behind it.  I totally agree with you on this.

She was doing the same thing with her continuing posts from a book until I POINTED out how could ANYONE follow along with the story if she started a new thread each time she posted a new excerpt from the book?
Then she said she couldn't find her posts to add on to them, and I told her she could look through her post history til she found it there.

(OK, yeah I probably did do that kinda bitc*ily, as it really irritated me)

But now she does post the book excerpts (I think?) in one thread.

You were right, though.       I guess she hasn't noticed the "Bookmarks" she can do.  Lol, at least you admitted the irritating part of it and how you probably came across, but it seemed to work!  I can't remember if I've seen her book excerpts or not...   

[duroz]

I can't remember if I've seen her book excerpts or not...   

Hans Christian Anderson....like maybe "The Tinderbox", and......
duh! I can't remember any of the others.