Daily Bible Verse

[falcon9]

It's certainly not unacceptable to believers. 

Indeed; I'm already aware that blind faith requires no evidence and that such a lack is a presumed requirement of empty beliefs.

There may or may not be a specific requirement for a "creator" - you have no evidence to 100 percent back that up.  At least you can admit to the fact that "emergent theories" are just that - theories - not 100 percent proven at this point.

Emergent theories may be either proven or, disproven at some point.  Your pseudo-'theory' of a "creator g-d" is based entirely upon blind faith and no evidence therefore, it never will be proven.  In that case, it isn't necessary to 'disprove' such a pseudo-non-theory because the burden of proof remains with someone who claims that there is a 'creator g-d', (which you and otehrs have implicitly or eplicitly done).

[falcon9]

... you really have exhausted your current supply ...

Hardly.  It was extrapolated that the previous words were 'beyond you' since you exhibited no depth of understanding them and using others would not be conducive to 'dumbing it down' further.

... and we would be a little less tediously bored, to see some new ones introduced into your conversation.

Boredom is a sign of a lack of imagination.  If you're bored by the replies received, don't bother reading them, (that's how it appears even when you do technically 'respond').

[jcribb16]

... you really have exhausted your current supply ...

Hardly.  It was extrapolated that the previous words were 'beyond you' since you exhibited no depth of understanding them and using others would not be conducive to 'dumbing it down' further.

... and we would be a little less tediously bored, to see some new ones introduced into your conversation.

Boredom is a sign of a lack of imagination.  If you're bored by the replies received, don't bother reading them, (that's how it appears even when you do technically 'respond').

Well, see, that's where you could take your own advice - don't bother reading the verses in here  -  then you won't be so badly tortured.  You don't know my mind, either, so you can stop the ridiculous "assuming" of my responses.  Your attempts at "dumbing down" are not as conducive (or contributive) as you think they are.

[falcon9]

Well, see, that's where you could take your own advice - don't bother reading the verses in here  -  then you won't be so badly tortured.  

Your further inept attempts to censor dissenting viewpoints is rejected out of hand, (since the reasons for doing so have been previously iterated and not understood, according to your 'replies').

[jcribb16]

Well, see, that's where you could take your own advice - don't bother reading the verses in here  -  then you won't be so badly tortured.  

Your further inept attempts to censor dissenting viewpoints is rejected out of hand, (since the reasons for doing so have been previously iterated and not understood, according to your 'replies').

Yours are rejected as well.  How nice - we have more opportunities to disagree.  You love the attention and the sparking of what you are attempting to do, and so you will most definitely receive some more attention, like you want. 

[falcon9]

Yours are rejected as well.  How nice - we have more opportunities to disagree. 

The difference is that I'm rejecting your irrationality and you're rejecting my rationality.  Good luck with that; your method is like shopping for groceries at the tire shop.

You love the attention and the sparking of what you are attempting to do, and so you will most definitely receive some more attention, like you want. 

If that's intended as some sort of lame 'threat', it's an inane one.  Contrary to your assumptions, I'm not trying to censor/limit/restrict/constrain your speciously-baseless religious claims.  If you faith-blinded religious adherents didn't post them, there could be no opposing/dissenting responses to them.  There are no posts initiated by me which 'dissent in advance' so, that makes your initial posts the offensive instigation of these exchanges, (regardless of whether you see your own proselytizations as instigating or offensive).

[jcribb16]

Yours are rejected as well.  How nice - we have more opportunities to disagree. 

The difference is that I'm rejecting your irrationality and you're rejecting my rationality.  Good luck with that; your method is like shopping for groceries at the tire shop.

You love the attention and the sparking of what you are attempting to do, and so you will most definitely receive some more attention, like you want. 

If that's intended as some sort of lame 'threat', it's an inane one.  Contrary to your assumptions, I'm not trying to censor/limit/restrict/constrain your speciously-baseless religious claims.  If you faith-blinded religious adherents didn't post them, there could be no opposing/dissenting responses to them.  There are no posts initiated by me which 'dissent in advance' so, that makes your initial posts the offensive instigation of these exchanges, (regardless of whether you see your own proselytizations as instigating or offensive).

You have truly gone overboard with your high regard of self-importance.      You are going to have one tough time when your little balloon of too much ego gets popped.  Have a nice evening - I'm sleepy.   

[falcon9]

You have truly gone overboard with your high regard of self-importance.    

Once again, your assumptions are built upon flimsy false premises, (because they lack evidentiary basis and are, instead, your empty subjective opinion).
  

You are going to have one tough time when your little balloon of too much ego gets popped.  Have a nice evening - I'm sleepy.   

You mistake logical thought processes for "ego"; which makes no rational sense but then, that's been your M.O. all along.

[lhz123]

People who are ruled by their desires think only of themselves. Everyone who is ruled by the Holy Spirit thinks about spiritual things. If our minds are ruled by our desires, we will die. But if our minds are ruled by the Spirit, we will have life and peace. — Romans 8:5-6 (CEV)

[falcon9]

Blatant religious proselytizing brain-washing attempt.  Rejected as mind-blinding hockum.

— Romans 8:5-6 (CEV)

[lhz123]

Let your faith be like a shield, and you will be able to stop all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Let God's saving power be like a helmet, and for a sword use God's message that comes from the Spirit. Never stop praying, especially for others. Always pray by the power of the Spirit. Stay alert and keep praying for God's people. — Ephesians 6:16-18 (CEV)

[falcon9]

The only thing blind faith stops is a rational thinking process, and that's only for the holder of the superstitious religious belief - not for anyone else.

Let your faith be like a shield, and you will be able to stop all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Let God's saving power be like a helmet, and for a sword use God's message that comes from the Spirit. Never stop praying, especially for others. Always pray by the power of the Spirit. Stay alert and keep praying for God's people. — Ephesians 6:16-18 (CEV)

[jcribb16]

Blatant religious proselytizing brain-washing attempt.  Rejected as mind-blinding hockum.

— Romans 8:5-6 (CEV)

It's fortunate to be able to vocalize your rejections, isn't it?  It feels good, too, doesn't it, when you can reject something you don't like.  Some don't reject it, and they are just as fortunate to be able to vocalize their acceptance of something they like.  Going completely over the edge with rejection begins to sound like something else - fighting against something so much that the bitterness takes over the rational thought processes and affects attitudes and behaviors towards others who accept what they choose.  The only one getting hurt, logically, is the bitter one trying to force their rejection onto others who are quite content in their own personal choices.  There's no need to come down so hard on yourself - it just makes the bitterness worse.

[falcon9]

It's fortunate to be able to vocalize your rejections, isn't it?  It feels good, too, doesn't it, when you can reject something you don't like. 

That's one of the major drawbacks to being a faith-blinded fundie; the lack of reasoning skills.  Superstitious religious "faith" isn't rejected simply because I "don't like" it; historical evidence for rejecting such specious blind faith is abundant, (some of which has been previously posted). 

Some don't reject it, and they are just as fortunate to be able to vocalize their acceptance of something they like. 

The gullible have always had the option to embrace blind faith and reject reason.

Going completely over the edge with rejection begins to sound like something else - fighting against something so much that the bitterness takes over the rational thought processes and affects attitudes and behaviors towards others who accept what they choose.  

Your irrational non-rebuttal has no supporting evidence.  The lines of reasoning and logic, as well as documented evidence presented so not constitute "going completely over the edge" just because you don't like it.  The basis of rejecting you faith-blind superstitions remains rational and your imputing otherwise appears to be simply a reflection of your own emotional/irrational reaction to the rejection of the blind faith you cling so desparately and illogically to.

[lhz123]

Always let others see you behaving properly, even though they may still accuse you of doing wrong. Then on the day of judgment, they will honor God by telling the good things they saw you do. — 1 Peter 2:12 (CEV)