Gay Marriage

[hitch0403]

Jesus called the twelve apostles together. He gave the apostles power to heal sicknesses and power to force demons out of people. Jesus sent the apostles to tell about God's kingdom and to heal the sick. He said to the apostles, "When you travel, don't take a walking stick. Also, don't carry a bag, food, or money. Take for your trip only the clothes you are wearing. When you go into a house, stay there until it is time to leave. If the people in the town will not welcome you, go outside the town and shake their dust off of your feet. This will be a warning to them." So the apostles went out. They traveled through all the towns. They told the Good News and healed people everywhere. Governor Herod heard about all these things that were happening. He was confused because some people said, "John the Baptizer is risen from death." Other people said, "Elijah has come to us." And some other people said, "One of the prophets from long ago has risen from death." Herod said, "I cut off John's head. So who is this man I hear these things about?" Herod continued trying to see Jesus.

[falcon9]

Jesus called ...

No valid evidence has been provided to support the proselytizing religious claim made.  Such propagandizing "witnessing" of blind religious faith may not be specifically prohibited under FC guidelines and TOS however, neither is rational opposition to 'sermonizing' unrelated to the thread topic nor containing any "debate" or "discuss" content.  It's overt religious pontification which disregards the intent of the D&D subforum and is therefore simply spamming.

[jcribb16]

Hey, Hitch. Guess what? Congratulations on becoming an internet troll.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[3] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[4] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

The definition fits him however, doubtless he and other xtian 'internet trolls' will attempt to attach that designation to others without evidence, (bearing in mind that their religiously-biased 'opinions' do not constitute actual evidence).  Whereas, there is abundant archived evidence of several xtian trolls initially posting trolling posts on FC forums, (responses to trolling posts aren't initial trollings since they're responses to trolls).

Strange how that definition fits many of your posts.  Just because you are trying to lay the blame on believers for "initially" posting posts you don't agree with, doesn't mean they are "initial."  It's your opinion that they are "initial" and so you are trying to take advantage of that in a twisted way to soothe your ego and loathing of believers and their faith.  Many of those posts are started to share with other believers and ones who are interested in the topic, not to "proselytize" - that is your interpretation and your opinion, which does not make it fact, just because you think it's fact. 

If that's the case, then the same could be applied to you "initially" posting a Wiccan thread, including trying to sway people to the Wiccan way.  Many don't believe that way, so you are causing a problem then because of trying to "proselytize" others who don't agree with that.  HOWEVER, I only used it as an example to make a point.  No one is forcing anyone to open that thread, and you aren't Wiccan, so it's not technically "proselytizing," and I'm not wanting to cut down that thread, out of respect to those who believe that. But, some could infer that you deliberately started that thread to get back at believers, because you know believers don't believe that personally, and you think it would have riled them.  It doesn't rile believers - all are entitled to believe in who or what they choose to believe in or of. 

[falcon9]

Hey, Hitch. Guess what? Congratulations on becoming an internet troll.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[3] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[4] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

The definition fits him however, doubtless he and other xtian 'internet trolls' will attempt to attach that designation to others without evidence, (bearing in mind that their religiously-biased 'opinions' do not constitute actual evidence).  Whereas, there is abundant archived evidence of several xtian trolls initially posting trolling posts on FC forums, (responses to trolling posts aren't initial trollings since they're responses to trolls).

Strange how that definition fits many of your posts.  Just because you are trying to lay the blame on believers for "initially" posting posts you don't agree with, doesn't mean they are "initial." 

"Initial" means 'first', (among other things).  The religious proselytizing trolling posts were made before any responses to them were posted, (because that what "response" is - something which occurs after the initial trolling).

It's your opinion that they are "initial" ...

No, my "opinion" has no bearing on who posted first, (xtians), since that's archived and an opinion or, "belief" has no impact on facts.

If that's the case, then the same could be applied to you "initially" posting a Wiccan thread, including trying to sway people to the Wiccan way. 

There is no "swaying" or proselytizing posted by me in the wiccan informational thread.  If you disagree, produce intact quotes directly indicating this to support your "opinion", (not some irrational 'interpretation' but, actual evidence within the meaning of that term and of "swaying").

Many don't believe that way, so you are causing a problem then because of trying to "proselytize" others who don't agree with that.

Once again, without directly valid evidence to support such a petulant opinion, it is rendered empty/specious/false/a lie.  Produce the evidence, retract your lie or, it can be added as evidence of your penchant for lying.
 

HOWEVER, ... you aren't Wiccan, so it's not technically "proselytizing," ...

Your accusation, (and self-contradicting admission), then becomes deliberate trolling instead of a counter-argument.

[jcribb16]

The thing is, the "initial" posting of threads ARE NOT TROLLING.  If they were, they would be locked, and/or the posters reprimanded or given "time-out."  It's YOUR VIEW of what you see it as because of the fact you DISLIKE ANY RELIGIOUS THREADS, PERIOD.  You are free to dislike all you want, but they are NOT TROLLING.  PERIOD.

[falcon9]

The thing is, the "initial" posting of threads ARE NOT TROLLING.
If they were, they would be locked, and/or the posters reprimanded or given "time-out."

No, their trolling  is probably permitted by FC so as not to suppress blind religious faith. They're still trolling under the definition of that term, even if permitted by a private forum.

It's YOUR VIEW of what you see it as because of the fact you DISLIKE ANY RELIGIOUS THREADS, PERIOD.  You are free to dislike all you want, but they are NOT TROLLING.  PERIOD.

Your dissenting opinion, (sans any evidence whatsoever that the threads initially started by xtians to troll with religious proselytizing aren't is merely an empty denial).  The reason they are permitted in the Off Topic forum and D&D subforum is because such off topic subjects fall under the general definition of "off topic", (hence, the name).  Such xtian-initiated threads of religious proselytizing which show up in other unrelated forums aren't on-topic and technically constitute trolling.  I'm not an FC moderator or staff and leave deciding the form any moderation takes up to the FC staff, (instead of trying to get censorship imposed on those who oppose religious proselytizing so that it can run rampantly-unopposed).

[hitch0403]

Just remember.....before any Falcons get by me first...they must pay a TrOLL!!!


Heh Heh!

[hitch0403]

I dont allow EZ Pass either.

[Falconer02]

Just remember.....before any Falcons get by me first...they must pay a TrOLL!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcYppAs6ZdI&feature=fvwp&NR=1

[katmiller11]

I so am not opposed to same sex marriage.
I believe that those who want to get married should have the same rights as those who enter into a traditional heterosexual marriage.

[falcon9]

At least you admitted being a troll, (albeit semi-sarcastically), though you've seem to have mistaken this forum for a bridge to 'propaganda-ville.'

Just remember.....before any Falcons get by me first...they must pay a TrOLL!!!

[llewis3417]

I am against gay marriage, I am a women of God and I believe that God created woman for man and not the other way around. It is a sin in the eye sight of God if you want a reference go read Genesis 2:18-25.

God Bless   

[heroftimes]

The bible - Restricting human rights for 2000+ years. 

I am against gay marriage, I am a women of God and I believe that God created woman for man and not the other way around. It is a sin in the eye sight of God if you want a reference go read Genesis 2:18-25.

God Bless   

[hitch0403]

Just remember.....before any Falcons get by me first...they must pay a TrOLL!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcYppAs6ZdI&feature=fvwp&NR=1

Do not post links to other sites is in rules.....naughty naughty

[heroftimes]

Just remember.....before any Falcons get by me first...they must pay a TrOLL!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcYppAs6ZdI&feature=fvwp&NR=1

Do not post links to other sites is in rules.....naughty naughty

Quote from: Kohler on October 05, 2008, 06:12:27 pm
3. Do not paste links to other sites -- This means no referral links whatsoever

A rule that should probably be number one or number two on the list, because it seems to the be the one most broken. This forum is for FusionCash, not for you to see how many people you can get to your other site that you make money off of. It is not a forum for you to spam your link to your store, candle selling site, or any other site that you can make money off of others. If it is a video on YouTube, or a news story you wish to share with us, by all means share your link.  But you should not post links to sites that you own, or in which you have a vested interest. We do not need people sharing links that contains links to other sites where the original poster can gain money from other members. Any link found that contains referral links will be taken down immediately, and the poster will be promptly banned. If you have a link and you are unsure if you can post it, please send in a support ticket or an email to support@fusioncash.com and I will be more than happy to look it over and let you know.

Seeing as he has no vested interest or doesn't own youtube, he's well within his posting privlages.