The both of you have your ignoramus feeling Re bible,God,JWs etc. and that will always be a factor to any that witness or promote them.
I've already stated this- it is up to YOU to prove that your reasonings are correct and show how your beliefs are real and logical. I am completely open to you actually being correct, but you have failed miserably at proving anything. A great example is the last few pages of this thread! You have never been able to do this, so anyone reading will probably conclude that you cannot explain things coherently and thus your message has no divine foundation.
Such a conclusion, (that "hitch's" religious belief has no supporting evidence), would be the logical deduction. Though he tries to dodge his responsibility of having the burden of proof for making such an religious claim, it still stems from a belief sans evidence.
They have nothing NEW to say anyway
Actually the debate earlier where you failed to explain anything logically was fairly new. I also don't recall arguing how perfect beings can make silly errors.
That's due to his claim being specious, (lacking any evidence whatsoever and relying upon blind religious faith alone). Since the religious claim is internally-contradictory and lacks substantiating evidence, it is an irrational claim and a dodge.
I could care less if you guys ever chat with me.The both of you are obsessed with always commenting on my posts...i dont care either but as ive said many times leave me alone and i will leave you alone.
Oh please. Stop whining and playing the victim card. You are the one who posts in areas where we post the most. You have been warned constantly. It's like you want to play baseball with the debate + discuss locals and then you get ticked off when you keep striking out because you can't hit our throws so you demand that we leave the field so you can have a chance to actually hit something. Either get better at using the caged brain of yours or get off the field and cry and moan somewhere else.
In an recent previous post, "hitch" admitted specifically that he was not "debating" and essentially is posting just to proselytize, ("witness"), his cult's beliefs. Proselytizing is neither debating nor discussing, though this thread exists in the "Debate & Discuss" subforum. Since he's not debating or discussing, (and merely propagandizing a religious belief while tossing 'troll flames' in at random), it is inferred that "hitch" is simply trolling under the definition of "internet troll".