... there are a few I ignore and even starting your own they find it and degrade and belittle ppl it is sad I ignore it ...
Once again, posting that you're "ignoring" something or someone isn't
ignoring; it's emphasizing hypocrisy and ignorance in using such prejudicially-biased terms as "degrade" and "belittle" in a passive-aggressive way. From this, it can be determined that what's actually being "ignored" is the refutation of such 'not-ignoring' posts as yours. Of course, should your method be deemed "snide" and "cowardly" instead of 'degrading' & 'belittling', you'd no doubt perceive that as being
completely different.
... it is just getting where you have to really look for a topic that there is not some dispute in and usually the disputes go completely off the topic all together....
A careful review of such "disputes", (contrary to the one you expressed), will reveal that specious religious commentary was most often interjected by religious adherents in a thread which had nothing to do with religion, and that
those were disputed. Just to be clear; any poster can interject something into a discussion/exchange which may or may not be in context of a thread. So too may any poster dispute/oppose/dissent with such
initial interjections.
...very frustrating and they should see who is doing this because it is not hard and maybe take away their 3 for the month.
A vote for repression of dissent is a vote for religious theocracy. FC is not a religious theocracy. On the contrary, for a moderated discussion forum(s), the mods are extremely tolerant of opposing viewpoints and give considerable enough leeway to allow all kinds of
different points of view, (without suppressing some and not others).