I ignore the anti-religious hate comments because they can ignore the posts they don't want to read just like I do.
Well, it isn't really 'ignoring' such if you're characterizing challenging blind faith as "anti-religious hate comments", now is it? Certainly those who do challenger the 'faithers' have the choice to respond or ignore the constant flow of religious propaganda floated as proselytizing, (e.g., the endless requoting of biblical passages, the intercessory magical rituals [prayers], and the expousing of specious religious beliefs left & right). For some reason, the 'believers' seem unable to realize that others, (who don't 'believe' as they do), might find such to be as "rude"/"offensive"/"presumptuous"/"impolite" and every bit the "hate comments" as those 'believers' find challenges to their blind faith to be.
Although that's a hypocritical attitude for 'faithers' to hold, they are free to do so - just as anyone who
doesn't adhere to those religious beliefs is free to ignore or, dissent with with. Bottomline; if one chooses to "ignore" something and proceeds to
not ignore it by commenting about it circuitously anyway then, they don't know what the word "ignore" means. It could be suggested that they learn, (in regards to the
FC ignore function) and seeing as how this is the Suggestions forum.
Everyone should respect each others views and if a few religious based comments here and there get a person all that upset I find that a little amusing because I guess its like throwing holy water on a vampire.
If your meaning is that getting upset about it does as much good as "holy water on a vampire", then I'd agree, (but only due to both being fictional superstitions).