whats with society these days?

[sammywantsya]

yes yes yes

[sigmapi1501]

Yes, he shot the kid ONLY for wearing a hoodie.
I think the internet could be a problem. Too many people that can barely put a sentence together are given much to loud a voice.

[falcon9]

Yes, he shot the kid ONLY for wearing a hoodie.
I think the internet could be a problem. Too many people that can barely put a sentence together are given much to loud a voice.

That was sublimely subtle, "siggy". I salute you.

[sammywantsya]

we have rights to do so aint it? you can make smirky comments on my topic but this is for pple who can tone it down a notch. internet a problem maybe.. dont try to mention me on the subject... this is for friendly convo not some know it all..


  id guess thIs AnnOys You Riggght? yoWhooo DieD you nd made you thE king Of Rules...

[carlosveli]

True...it taste nasty

[carlosveli]

I think so at least in Dallas Tx 4sho

[sammywantsya]

True...it taste nasty

i know right... its just nasty

[falcon9]

we have rights to do so aint it?

"Rights" to do what, your question is vague.

you can make smirky comments on my topic but this is for pple who can tone it down a notch.

The poster who starts, (or replies to), a topic does not have a deed of ownership on that topic by dint of posting it to an forum open to any FC member who chooses to comment in a thread.  The OP doesn't get to determine what others choose to post in regards to any particular topic just because the OP started a thread, (because that would be pretentious and ignorant).
 

...dont try to mention me on the subject... this is for friendly convo not some know it all...

In this particular instance, the response was in reply to another member and neither of us mentioned you by 'nym.  In any other instance, you don't get to have your 'orders' obeyed since these forums are not your private dictatorship, 'princess', (of the delusions of her own mind).

  id guess thIs AnnOys You Riggght?

Nope, that's just you making a generally trolling post, (again).  Please continue at will(fulness).

[falcon9]

True...it taste nasty

i know right... its just nasty

You two might consider not 'licking' your own posts, (or preening each other), if you don't like the "taste" of them.

[sammywantsya]

ohh btw this isnt a D+D section.. i can make a thread i want too everyone can. its not trolling where you keeping trolling the user here..

this isnt a religion topic iether .. so if you have anything good or bad to say within the topic please do so.

thank you for understanding

[pattersondebra]

Its very crazy, in my small town a boy was shot and killed over a missing ipod. They later found it in the house.

[falcon9]

ohh btw this isnt a D+D section.. i can make a thread i want too everyone can.

That's correct; your're two for two, (but only in this specific instance and in that teh d+d forum is a subforum of Off Topic, where your post was posted).  What you are incorrect concerning is your inherent presumption as to 'owning' or, controlling a thread you happened to start.  As stated previously, an OP doesn't 'own' a thread; no one does.  That's why "subject-drift" occurs within nearly every thread, (especially the longer ones), as contributors go off on their own tangents.  This is very common, not only in forums but, within conversations out in the world, (or haven't you noticed that as yet?).

its not trolling where you keeping trolling the user here...

Trolling is generally a thread initiated by the OP, (not a reply in response unless come form of 'counter-trolling' is occurring), which is intended to "bait" others.

this isnt a religion topic iether ...

I'm aware of that, which is probably why I didn't previously bring religion into this topic, (although you just did, so now it's open season on that aspect).

so if you have anything good or bad to say within the topic please do so.

What you are incorrect concerning is your inherent presumption as to 'owning' or, controlling a thread you happened to start.  As stated previously, an OP doesn't 'own' a thread; no one does.  That means, you can 'tell' others what to do all you wish however, others are under no obligation whatsoever to comply with your 'demands'.  I, for one, will continue to reject them under the demonstrated premise of subject-drift.

thank you for understanding

What I understand is that you have shown an extremely inaccurate apprehension of how the FC forums and others matters actually work.  While such self-deceptions as you practice, (until you get them down?), aren't particularly uncommon, they tend to cast considerable doubt on the basis of your 'opinions'.

[sammywantsya]

so if you have anything good or bad to say within the topic please do so.

thank you for understanding

[falcon9]

so if you have anything good or bad to say within the topic please do so.

Your inherent presumption as to 'owning' or, controlling a thread you happened to start continues to be false, no matter how many times you repeat the falsehood.  As stated previously, an OP doesn't 'own' a thread; no one does. Saying "please" doesn't change those facts.

thank you for understanding

I do understand what you apparently continue failing to comprehend and there's no thanks for that.

[sammywantsya]

so if you have anything good or bad to say within the topic please do so.

thank you for understanding