why are some people so critical

[SherylsShado]

You might want to go back out and get some more then because according to most of your posts...it's quite clear that you're suffering from lack of oxygen...

 Perhaps your drawers are on too tight...  maybe backwards? 

Nice to see the Personal Attack Monster is rearing it's ugly head again....

A rather pitiful way to carry on a discussion.

It is pitiful, please go stick your head back in the sand.

[SherylsShado]

Apparently, that's all they've got, in lieu of a cognizant rebuttal.  It's almost as if it were a tacit 'surrender' while implicitly declaring some sort of 'victory' on their part.  Sure, such irrationality is one way to go but, it backfires on 'em.

What's the matter buster?  You were having so much fun trolling on the 'fundies' and now you don't like that the tables have turned, and I'm poking fun of your 'undies'??

[duroz]

It is pitiful, please go stick your head back in the sand.

Yet ANOTHER Personal Attack??

(Where might you return YOUR head to, though....??)

[SherylsShado]

It is pitiful, please go stick your head back in the sand.

Yet ANOTHER Personal Attack??

(Where might you return YOUR head to, though....??)

And the troll is yelling "persecution" again...

[duroz]

It is pitiful, please go stick your head back in the sand.

Yet ANOTHER Personal Attack??

(Where might you return YOUR head to, though....??)

And the troll is yelling "persecution" again...

Nah, just pointing out that you have to resort to name calling and personal attacks to post.....

"troll is yelling persecution" would imply that I gave a crap WHAT you say about me. 

[SherylsShado]

It is pitiful, please go stick your head back in the sand.

Yet ANOTHER Personal Attack??

(Where might you return YOUR head to, though....??)

And the troll is yelling "persecution" again...

Nah, just pointing out that you have to resort to name calling and personal attacks to post.....

"troll is yelling persecution" would imply that I gave a crap WHAT you say about me. 

you must to keep following me around the forum like you do.  If you take a "looksy", you'll see that I haven't been following you.  Take another "looksy", enjoy this post because it'll be my last to you--  go find someone else to bait.

[falcon9]

you must to keep following me around the forum like you do. 

If you take a "looksy", you'll see that I haven't been following you.  Take another "looksy", enjoy this post because it'll be my last to you--  go find someone else to bait.

Responding to posts, (especially those quoting respondants), isn't merely them "following around".  Many people who try twisting the post/exchange posts discussions into such terms, (while they are continuing to reply as well), have failed to apprehend the underlying concept.
Further, accusing others of 'baiting' while the content of the accusser's post consists of 'baiting' is hypocritcal.

[SherylsShado]

you must to keep following me around the forum like you do. 

If you take a "looksy", you'll see that I haven't been following you.  Take another "looksy", enjoy this post because it'll be my last to you--  go find someone else to bait.

Responding to posts, (especially those quoting respondants), isn't merely them "following around".  Many people who try twisting the post/exchange posts discussions into such terms, (while they are continuing to reply as well), have failed to apprehend the underlying concept.
Further, accusing others of 'baiting' while the content of the accusser's post consists of 'baiting' is hypocritcal.

Reeallly?  Anyone can look at my posts and see where and when deroz starts posting to me and what those posts consist of and see for themselves if they don't see a troll trying to bait.  It's fairly obvious.

[falcon9]

What's the matter buster?  You were having so much fun trolling on the 'fundies' ...

Your perception is inaccurate; the fundies initially posted their unsupported assertions, (which could be considered to be 'trolling' under the common parameters of that term), and I challenged their unsubstantiated assertions.  Such challenges do not fall under the parameters of 'trolling' unless there are no subsequent discussions.  Since followup replies were posted, (at least until the fundies bailed), those challenges are not 'trollings' under the meaning of that term.
 

... and now you don't like that the tables have turned, and I'm poking fun of your 'undies'??

The tables have not been turned since your claim that I was "trolling" has been refuted.  As for you poking at my underwear, my girlfriend wouldn't let you get close enough.  Metaphorically, you still haven't gotten close enough as your ad hominems have consistly missed by wide margins.  Hopefully, you won't have such poor aim should the zombie apocalypse occur, (e.g., fundies take over).

[falcon9]

you must to keep following me around the forum like you do. 
If you take a "looksy", you'll see that I haven't been following you.  Take another "looksy", enjoy this post because it'll be my last to you--  go find someone else to bait.

Responding to posts, (especially those quoting respondants), isn't merely them "following around".  Many people who try twisting the post/exchange posts discussions into such terms, (while they are continuing to reply as well), have failed to apprehend the underlying concept.
Further, accusing others of 'baiting' while the content of the accusser's post consists of 'baiting' is hypocritcal.

Reeallly?  Anyone can look at my posts and see where and when deroz starts posting to me and what those posts consist of and see for themselves if they don't see a troll trying to bait.  It's fairly obvious.

The posts remain in this thread, as does the sequence of posts.  Your posts, (which were accurately described as "name-calling" and even 'baiting'), _preceded_ "duroz's" subsequent comments.  Are you trying to censor where and what "duroz" can post to by characterizing their replies as "following" you around?

[SherylsShado]

@falcon9   

The posts remain in this thread, as does the sequence of posts.  Your posts, (which were accurately described as "name-calling" and even 'baiting'), _preceded_ "duroz's" subsequent comments.  Are you trying to censor where and what "duroz" can post to by characterizing their replies as "following" you around?

He can post whatever & where ever he wants.  It's terribly ironic however that everytime I have a conflicting opinion with one of two people on this forum...he shows right up and starts his mud-slinging.   I won't be baited, you don't have a problem with that, do you? 
   If you think you haven't insulted people, maybe we should start a thread and let everyone dissect your posts and post all the insults you have posted (since there are so many of them that no one person would have the time to backtrack through endless pages of pretentious drivel that is intended to appear wise, but which generally makes little sense (if any)). 
  I'm not sure if you've posted all that gibberish in the hope that it'll either bore or confuse to death those with whom you disagree.
     You're definitely "a pursuitist who gromulates his adversarial computerists with height defining formulations to the disinterestingest adjunct."

[falcon9]

It's terribly ironic however that everytime I have a conflicting opinion with one of two people on this forum...
[/quotes]

That's not irony, as "Abrupt" previously indicated. 

he shows right up and starts his mud-slinging.   I won't be baited, you don't have a problem with that, do you?

He didn't however, 'show right up and started' - he replied to that which you started.  It's right there in the relavent threads, in Sequence.  You seem to feel that you can engage in "baiting" while inaccurately accusing others of initiating it.  Other than that, I don't have a real problem with you posting as wished - as long as this is reciprocated, (which it hasn't been lately).
 

   If you think you haven't insulted people, maybe we should start a thread and let everyone dissect your posts and post all the insults you have posted (since there are so many of them that no one person would have the time to backtrack through endless pages of pretentious drivel that is intended to appear wise, but which generally makes little sense (if any)).

Go for it.  While you're at it, note your 'insults' consisting of "pretentious drivel", "gibberish", "bore" and some unattributed quoted 'gibberish' below:
 

  I'm not sure if you've posted all that gibberish in the hope that it'll either bore or confuse to death those with whom you disagree.
     You're definitely "a pursuitist who gromulates his adversarial computerists with height defining formulations to the disinterestingest adjunct."

[kpopg33k]

I think that could be just a problem with self-confidence and being insecure.  Those that tend to pick on people (like high school bullies) are just uncomfortable in their own skin, so they pick on others smaller, weaker, or seemingly less intelligent to make themselves seem superior.  Don't let rude comments bother you!

[jcribb16]

I think that could be just a problem with self-confidence and being insecure.  Those that tend to pick on people (like high school bullies) are just uncomfortable in their own skin, so they pick on others smaller, weaker, or seemingly less intelligent to make themselves seem superior.  Don't let rude comments bother you!

Good way to put that. 

[duroz]

you must to keep following me around the forum like you do. 

  Following YOU?!?!   Oh please somebody help me if ever do that....

Why would I follow you? You're going the wrong way...