If your verbal bully tactics are reasoned opposition
Falsely characterizing reasoned opposition and challenges to unreasoned pronouncements as "verbal bully tactics" has two significant flaws. The first is that this is a text-based medium and not a verbal one. The second is that reasoned dissent is not equivalent to "bully tactics" just because you have no cognizant response to them. Your biased, (unsupported opinion), is empty.
then you have been lying to yourself.
The irony there is sublime a a couple of levels. So, are you tacitly implying that _any_ dissenting response to your unsupported claims and empty opinions constitutes "bully tactics"?
You are entitled to your opinion, but when that opinion comes with putdowns
First, it's a reasoned "opinion", (as opposed to one without substantiation). Secondly, which alleged "putdowns" would those be again?
... high horse superiority ...
Ironically, I'm not putting myself on any "high horse", you are doing so with such characterizations. I have no need for a stirrup but, thanks anyway.
... and verbally shredding another person just because they believe in God ...
To be more accurate, it isn't "just because they believe in god"; I've mentioned a few other reasons, (which means reasoning was used in lieu of your usual pronouncement style argumentation).
... then something is very miserable and dark in your life.
Well, she's not really in my life; she just posts evangelical nonsense now and again in a public forum which I frequent and reply to on occasion.