daily Bible verse

[falcon9]

I totally agree. By the way my name is Rebekah Cochran. I used my old college logan TuscaroraRain. Tuscarora means a reference to my Native American tribe Tuscarora and Rain is a refernce to the Lord Jesus Christ being the Living Water.

I would highly recommend not giving out any information about yourself online. It's not due to showing "forum courage"-- it's for your own physical safety. Primarily because there are a lot of creeps out on the innernetz. I mean one could easily look up your name and probably find out your home address.

I concur however, sometimes the "creeps" are those who give out too much information and then try to falsely accuse others of being "cowards" for not doing so.  These are not "echoes of a silent river", they constitute 'flapping the gums' too much.

[mshappy]

Then shall the righteous answer him, saying. LORD when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

[falcon9]

This random incoherency brought to by the sponsors of blind faith:

Then shall the righteous answer him, saying. LORD when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

[jcribb16]

As far as I can understand:

Jedi states Falcon9 was someone who hid behind a screen name to express their opinion was a coward.

You then agree with this statement.

Falcon9 then states it is illogical to call someone a coward because they hid behind a screen name because you are required to hide behind a screen name on Fusion cash, therefore behind a coward cannot have anything to do with hiding behind a screen name.

You then state that falcon9 statement was false with this statement: "Not everyone in the forum - the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

Ignoring the first part, because it isn't really relevant, we get: "the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

Which leads me to believe that you think someone calling someone else a coward is a coward themselves because they are hiding behind a screen name. But you are still calling someone else a coward because they are hiding behind a screen name. Your arugument would make sense if it was this: "the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves" which does make a little more logical sense. But it isn't, you stated because they ARE hiding behind the screen name. Thus you are calling someone a coward because of their screen name, regardless of any other reason you stated.

Which leads me back to what falcon9 said.

As far as I can see it falcon9's logic still stands.

You appear to be following the logical line of reasoning which was used to refute the illogical tangents supplied by the faux-jedi and "jcribb16". It shouldn't be too surprising that irrational persons will dispute rationality however, it is ironic when someone attempts to use reason to support unreasoned arguments.

I do carefully read and analyze everything you and jedi said, and this was the conclusion I reached. I then tried to simplify the argument to see if you really believed that someone is a coward if they hide behind a screen name on a forum where they are required to hide behind a screen name regardless if their bravery. Because such a statement is obviously illogical. But instead you circumvented my argument and told me to try again. Could you help me out by telling me where I am wrong, please?

The only omission in your reasoning was that of the conclusion; that she was implicitly calling "jedijohnnie" a coward because he "hides behind a screen name" AND under the 'premise' that, by calling another a "coward", the faux-"jedi" is a coward.  If that premise is false, (and, logically, it is), then anycontentions derived from it are logically false as well.

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

[jcribb16]

The only omission in your reasoning was that of the conclusion; that she was implicitly calling "jedijohnnie" a coward because he "hides behind a screen name" AND under the 'premise' that, by calling another a "coward", the faux-"jedi" is a coward.  If that premise is false, (and, logically, it is), then anycontentions derived from it are logically false as well.

Oh I see. Is a bit clearer now. I really wasn't sure what Jscribb was trying to get at, only that the premises she was spouting where not logically sound. That makes the conclusion rather convoluted. I knew she was calling you a coward through her two premise's, but I didn't realize her "Calling someone a coward makes you a coward" premise also made Jedi a coward through that premise since you called you a coward to begin with. I see that now.

Please STOP the lies about me calling anyone, by name, a coward.  Knock off the ridiculous immaturity.

[jcribb16]

The lengths some atheists will go to to derail this thread.

Try this:If Falcon would actually use his real name ---you know,like I do (Johnnie)----to to make his bold,arrogent attacks,I would find it less cowardly than hiding behind a screenname and sniping at Christians who are minding their business.

Am I calling everyone who uses a screen name a coward.No.But If you want to act like a big shot by cutting people down who are minding their own business,then man up,and use your real name.OK,"falcon"?

I totally agree. By the way my name is Rebekah Cochran. I used my old college logan TuscaroraRain. Tuscarora means a reference to my Native American tribe Tuscarora and Rain is a refernce to the Lord Jesus Christ being the Living Water.

I like that name of TuscaroraRain - the explanation of it is beautiful. 

[falcon9]

"the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

It isn't a "lie" as the deduction was implicit, (as mentioned), in your agreement with the other fundie.  Since "jedijohnnie" is a screen name and not the name on his birth certificate, he is a "coward" by his own assertion, (which you agreed with).  Therefore, "jedijohnnie" called himself a coward and you agreed, there is no lie.

[falcon9]

I like that name of TuscaroraRain - the explanation of it is beautiful. 

That explanation is incomplete; "Tuscarora" means "hemp gatherers" in their native tongue therefore, "tuscarora rain" would mean something like 'gatherers who water hemp'.

[falcon9]

Please STOP the lies about me calling anyone, by name, a coward. 

Your reading comprehension skills are abysmal; no one stated you called anyone a coward "by name", you and he did it by logical implication, (a process which manifestly escapes faith-blinded religious fundies).

Knock off the ridiculous immaturity.

There's no desire to emulate your immaturity and distinctly diminished reasoning ability.  Were that to occur, blind faith would be possible.

[jcribb16]

"the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

It isn't a "lie" as the deduction was implicit, (as mentioned), in your agreement with the other fundie.  Since "jedijohnnie" is a screen name and not the name on his birth certificate, he is a "coward" by his own assertion, (which you agreed with).  Therefore, "jedijohnnie" called himself a coward and you agreed, there is no lie.

NO, falcon9 - stop with the twisting of the context of what he intended the remark to mean.  You are showing your foolish thinking here.  PLEASE STOP.

[jcribb16]

I like that name of TuscaroraRain - the explanation of it is beautiful. 

That explanation is incomplete; "Tuscarora" means "hemp gatherers" in their native tongue therefore, "tuscarora rain" would mean something like 'gatherers who water hemp'.

Since she is Native American, I will go with what she explained it to mean.  She understands that "inner working" of her Native American terms/meanings, whereas you are having to look it up.  And why are you telling me anyway?  If you disagree, then take it up with her - I was just offering my thoughts on her comments.

[falcon9]

"the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

It isn't a "lie" as the deduction was implicit, (as mentioned), in your agreement with the other fundie.  Since "jedijohnnie" is a screen name and not the name on his birth certificate, he is a "coward" by his own assertion, (which you agreed with).  Therefore, "jedijohnnie" called himself a coward and you agreed, there is no lie.
[/quote]

NO, falcon9 - stop with the twisting of the context of what he intended the remark to mean.

It's a logical deduction made by at least three other FC members and not a twist or a lie. 

You are showing your foolish thinking here.  PLEASE STOP.

You are showing your irrationality and lack of logical reasoning ability here.  I'd admonish you to cease but, you're apparently unable to rise out of the mire of illogic.

[Flackle]

"the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

It isn't a "lie" as the deduction was implicit, (as mentioned), in your agreement with the other fundie.  Since "jedijohnnie" is a screen name and not the name on his birth certificate, he is a "coward" by his own assertion, (which you agreed with).  Therefore, "jedijohnnie" called himself a coward and you agreed, there is no lie.

NO, falcon9 - stop with the twisting of the context of what he intended the remark to mean.  You are showing your foolish thinking here.  PLEASE STOP.

The only one twisting things out of context is you. If you actually read all of our statements, not once did we say "Jscribb called Jedijohnny a Coward" Instead we stated your premise that only cowards call other people cowards implicitly (And please look up the word, its obvious you don't know what it means.) makes Jedi a coward. Its very simple:

J is Jedi
B is Jscribb
F is Falcon

F states that J is a coward (the reasons don't matter here.)
J states F is a coward (the reasons don't matter here.)
B states F is a coward because of premise 2.

If F is a Coward for calling other people cowards (Premise 2.)
And J called someone a coward (Premise 1.)
Then J has to be a coward.

Therefore Person B implicitly called Person J a coward through logical deduction.

This does not mean I agree with your logic, however. This argument only talks about what was said, not the substance of those discussion. Your premise that people are cowards because they call other people cowards is still wrong.

[JediJohnnie]

"the comment was directed toward only anyone calling someone a coward, is a coward, themselves, because they ARE hiding behind the screen name."

I did NOT implicitly call "jedi johnnie" a coward.  Stop with the lies, please.

It isn't a "lie" as the deduction was implicit, (as mentioned), in your agreement with the other fundie.  Since "jedijohnnie" is a screen name and not the name on his birth certificate, he is a "coward" by his own assertion, (which you agreed with).  Therefore, "jedijohnnie" called himself a coward and you agreed, there is no lie.

NO, falcon9 - stop with the twisting of the context of what he intended the remark to mean.  You are showing your foolish thinking here.  PLEASE STOP.

No one said you had to use your full name on your birth certificate,Falcon.Just your first name.Like I do.

I tried to register as "Johnnie",(Since I don't feel the need to hide behind a clever screen name)but the name was taken.

"Jedi" is my favorite movie,and had a nice enough "ring" to it when placed in front of my name.Hence,my screen name.

Honestly,when I first joined,I thought I'd be having fun talking about some of my favorate hobbies,(Star Wars,Comics,Football,Etc) and not be pressed into service as a Christian Crusader.But seeing the abuse Christians have endured here by the atheists,I see clearly God had other plans for me here.And I'm more than willing to be guided by His Will as He sees fit.

[JediJohnnie]

The lengths some atheists will go to to derail this thread.

Try this:If Falcon would actually use his real name ---you know,like I do (Johnnie)----to to make his bold,arrogent attacks,I would find it less cowardly than hiding behind a screenname and sniping at Christians who are minding their business.

Am I calling everyone who uses a screen name a coward.No.But If you want to act like a big shot by cutting people down who are minding their own business,then man up,and use your real name.OK,"falcon"?

I totally agree. By the way my name is Rebekah Cochran. I used my old college logan TuscaroraRain. Tuscarora means a reference to my Native American tribe Tuscarora and Rain is a refernce to the Lord Jesus Christ being the Living Water.

I like that name of TuscaroraRain - the explanation of it is beautiful. 

I agree.Welcome Rebekah.