how old or young were you when you had sex the 1st time

[ashleyxatrocity]

Yes, your another one I've met in other threads who don't believe in the Bible either, so your comments are going to reflect that. However, how in the world can you agree with qon that marriage is the STD hotbed?  Get real!! There are no STD's in marriage if both partners come to the marriage bed as virgins and pure in body. There could be STD's if one of the partners come to the marriage with a sexual past which can be passed to their partner.

I can't believe that you both haven't got enough science to figure this out. Or your comments are ambiguous on purpose because neither one of you have a good argument.

STD: Sexually Transmitted Disease. The key word here is "Transmitted"

I don't recall saying anything to you in this thread so you have no right to come after me. Just as you have a right to state your closed minded opinions, I can state my open minded ones. Just because I don't believe in your fairy tales doesn't mean you have any right to single me out. Aren't Christians supposed to be accepting and nonjudgmental or is that just more lies?
I was never ambiguous about my posts at all. I replied to the topic of the post and went on my way until you decided to chime in with your wasteful 2 cents by quoting me. Your rationale is mind numbing and I would appreciate it if you would keep your filth away from me on the forums in the future.  

[mtmailey]

i think when i was 17 was the first time.

[falcon9]

Yes, your another one I've met in other threads who don't believe in the Bible either, so your comments are going to reflect that. However, how in the world can you agree with qon that marriage is the STD hotbed?  Get real!! There are no STD's in marriage if both partners come to the marriage bed as virgins and pure in body. There could be STD's if one of the partners come to the marriage with a sexual past which can be passed to their partner.

I can't believe that you both haven't got enough science to figure this out. Or your comments are ambiguous on purpose because neither one of you have a good argument.

STD: Sexually Transmitted Disease. The key word here is "Transmitted"

I don't recall saying anything to you in this thread so you have no right to come after me. Just as you have a right to state your closed minded opinions, I can state my open minded ones. Just because I don't believe in your fairy tales doesn't mean you have any right to single me out. Aren't Christians supposed to be accepting and nonjudgmental or is that just more lies?
I was never ambiguous about my posts at all. I replied to the topic of the post and went on my way until you decided to chime in with your wasteful 2 cents by quoting me. Your rational is mind numbing and I would appreciate it if you would keep your filth away from me on the forums in the future. 

Given her posted replies, there's a strong probability that you are over-estimating the "rational mind" part in Annella's instance.  Apparently, that self-proclaimed pentecostal fundamentist is reluctant to defend her various proclamations against "nonbelievers" so, there isn't a great deal to be concerned about in that respect.

[laine39]

I actually read this post to the end....first of all you can't push the bible on anyone. Your beliefs are your own, and you are debating with boxing gloves on to all who don't follow you. What is with this about coming into the marriage as virgins and STDs? You are educated enough to know that there are partners that cheat I hope, so two virgins marrying are not a guarantee against STDs. I am married and never would have married a man that I did not have sex with first....wow what if he was awful in bed....honestly. I don't think anyone should preach their religion to the extent that you are here, or anywhere for that matter!

[ashleyxatrocity]

I actually read this post to the end....first of all you can't push the bible on anyone. Your beliefs are your own, and you are debating with boxing gloves on to all who don't follow you. What is with this about coming into the marriage as virgins and STDs? You are educated enough to know that there are partners that cheat I hope, so two virgins marrying are not a guarantee against STDs. I am married and never would have married a man that I did not have sex with first....wow what if he was awful in bed....honestly. I don't think anyone should preach their religion to the extent that you are here, or anywhere for that matter!

YES!! You are correct on so many levels! 
PS: Always test drive a car before you buy it...same with people. 

[Annella]

Laine39: I gave my stance on this question. I did not "push" my beliefs on anybody so your attack is unprovoked. Like I said before....everybody has a choice. I made mine and you can make yours. It's not a contest here so put away your boxing gloves. I did not "preach" my religion, I merely said I believe what the Bible says about abstinence. It's amazing to me how threatened people become because someone believes in God and His Word. I really don't care if you don't like what I say about this subject. If you don't like it, you can always report to the administrator. However, they will tell you this is a public forum and open to everybody's opinions. When you become the owner of Fusion Cash, you can censor whatever you want. However, you will not censor me.....got it?

ashleyxatrocity: You have been very verbal, rude and insulting to me, and about Christians and the Bible in another thread. Go back and read this thread from the beginning. YOU answered my post through qon when I was posting to her, now you are trying to turn it around like I came after you to single you out? If you don't want to be addressed, then do not try address me, even through someone else to issue a "dig"....problem solved. Because I'll call you on it. This is a public forum and I will post wherever and whenever I like. You do not make the rules here.

So......you feel I have not been accepting and I've been judgmental? You have called my posts lies, wasteful, close minded, and filth. Your guilty of the very thing you are accusing me of, and I have said nothing even close to your put downs.

I was told by the Administrator if a person on the forum is following someone around from thread to thread just to harass them, then they will step in. However, opinions are not grounds for being banned on this forum. I have not broken any of the rules. I'm not following you around the forum to single you out.

[ashleyxatrocity]

ashleyxatrocity: You have been very verbal, rude and insulting to me, and about Christians and the Bible in another thread. Go back and read this thread from the beginning. YOU answered my post first, now you are trying to turn it around like I came after you to single you out. If you don't want to be addressed, then do not address me....problem solved. Christians are accepting, but they do not like their God or the Bible blasphemed. Again, this is a public forum and I will post wherever and whenever I like. You do not make the rules here.

So......you feel I have not been accepting and I've been judgmental? You have called my posts lies, wasteful, close minded, and filth. Your guilty of the very thing you are accusing me of and I have said nothing even close to your put downs.

I was told by the Administrator if someone is following you around from thread to thread just to harass you, then that can be addressed by them and stopped, among a few other things. You need to go back and read the rules and regs. to the forum and what is acceptable and what is not. I have not broken any of the Fusion Cash forum rules.

1. I've never addressed you in this thread before you quoted me. I made a broad generalization. You will, of course, defend this by saying "its a public forum" like you always do when you go after someone. Remember, you started with me.
2. I don't see how what I say/do affects your "god". If anything, you should know that constantly spewing out the same bible babble will get you nowhere. If someone's not interested in your interpretation of religion, then the "mature" decision would be to let them live their life and allow them to find out for themselves.
3. I never claimed to follow your "god" so I'm free to say and do what I please. I don't claim to be a good and righteous person yet am actually a hypocrite. I don't hide what I am like you do.
4. I have NOT followed you around AT ALL. If anything, its the other way around because you are always the first to begin these meaningless arguments with me.
You waste my time as well as ruin the FC experience with your hostility and lack of acceptance when it comes to diversity. I feel sorry for you because obviously somebody didn't give you enough attention in your life and you make up for it with your egotistical sense of entitlement. Save it for someone who cares.

[Annella]

ashleyxatrocity: You have been very verbal, rude and insulting to me, and about Christians and the Bible in another thread. Go back and read this thread from the beginning. YOU answered my post first, now you are trying to turn it around like I came after you to single you out. If you don't want to be addressed, then do not address me....problem solved. Christians are accepting, but they do not like their God or the Bible blasphemed. Again, this is a public forum and I will post wherever and whenever I like. You do not make the rules here.

So......you feel I have not been accepting and I've been judgmental? You have called my posts lies, wasteful, close minded, and filth. Your guilty of the very thing you are accusing me of and I have said nothing even close to your put downs.



I was told by the Administrator if someone is following you around from thread to thread just to harass you, then that can be addressed by them and stopped, among a few other things. You need to go back and read the rules and regs. to the forum and what is acceptable and what is not. I have not broken any of the Fusion Cash forum rules.

1. I've never addressed you in this thread before you quoted me. I made a broad generalization. You will, of course, defend this by saying "its a public forum" like you always do when you go after someone. Remember, you started with me.
2. I don't see how what I say/do affects your "god". If anything, you should know that constantly spewing out the same bible babble will get you nowhere. If someone's not interested in your interpretation of religion, then the "mature" decision would be to let them live their life and allow them to find out for themselves.
3. I never claimed to follow your "god" so I'm free to say and do what I please. I don't claim to be a good and righteous person yet am actually a hypocrite. I don't hide what I am like you do.
4. I have NOT followed you around AT ALL. If anything, its the other way around because you are always the first to begin these meaningless arguments with me.
You waste my time as well as ruin the FC experience with your hostility and lack of acceptance when it comes to diversity. I feel sorry for you because obviously somebody didn't give you enough attention in your life and you make up for it with your egotistical sense of entitlement. Save it for someone who cares.

Your entitled to your opinion. And......this is a public forum. Anyone can say what they want.

[L4v4]

I was around 16 for my first time. 

[falcon9]

America was never a "Christian" country, it's a country with a lot of Christians in it.  Big difference.

 

Oh no, not again qon. We have discussed this in great length before in past threads if America was founded on Biblical Christian beliefs and by God fearing people.

That is incorrect.  'As a point of information, the Pilgrims did not found the United States; they founded a small colony that eventually got swallowed up by the states and the newly formed federal government.

The belief that the Mayflower Compact was the basis for a Christian nation has caused many to attempt to reestablish what never existed: a Christian nation based upon Biblical precepts and founded upon a covenant relationship with God. What is overlooked is that the Mayflower Compact reaffirmed loyalty to the King of England; its framers never intended to found an independent state.

Ignoring, and even twisting the facts of history, "Christian" dominionists quote some of the founding fathers whose words seem to indicate faith in Jesus Christ. But many quoted were Freemasons.  While Freemasonry has an outward show of religious faith, the tenets of Freemasonry preclude any truly born-again believer from belonging. Into Freemasonry have been poured the irradiations of the mystical schools of antiquity. Particularly is this so in the higher degrees of the Order, such as the Scottish Rite, where undeniable traces of Cabalism, neo-Platonism, Rosicrucianism, and other mystical cults are plainly discernible.'

Out of everything I wrote above, this is what you picked out to discuss? For one thing, both you and qon are off topic in this thread. This is about having sex before marriage.

If that were the only point raised in this thread, you'd be correct.  Since it wasn't, you aren't.  

We have discussed this in great length before in past threads if America was founded on Biblical Christian beliefs and by God fearing people.

Go back to some previous threads (there are many) that this has been discussed in length......with both parties disagreeing. Thing is, a lot of history is, and has been (back at ya) twisted to introduce something that did not happen.

Merely claiming this without references to any sources makes your assertion weak.  I'm aware of many discussions on this particular topic in several other forums and you were the one who raised it again in this thread.  How off-topic of you.  Nonetheless, I replied to that aspect of the exchange within this thread.  If subject-drift disturbs your sensibilities, seek to avoid introducing it.

On the matter of the founding of the U.S., a colony is not a country.  There's no way to "twist" history to suit your bias.

You have also confronted me with the fact that the Bible is false. ]/quote]


More accurately, I disputed specious claims that it was the 'inerrant word of god'.  Seeing as how no evidence to support such claims has ever been produced, such claims are empty and disregarded.

However, your desire to follow me from thread to thread and refute anything and everything I post is a bit creepy.

No, I post replies in a public forum, just as you do.  You're, (not "your"), not following me and I'm not following you.  As implied, I'm following various threads, regardless of who posts in them.  Your, (not "you're"), insidious attempt to 'pre-poison the well' by insinuating a "desire to follow" you is dishonest and more than a bit creepy.

Your like a bully on the playground looking for a fight.

I've seen that disengenuous tactic used many times before and it won't work for you either; my responses are not textual 'bullying', they are reasoned dissent to which you apparently unable to rebute.  Instead of falsely accussing someone who disagrees with your specious declarations of opinion as 'bullying', you could ignore the replies, (e.g., not respond), or respond with a counter-arguement.

You may have some in awe of your big words, but allot of times your postings don't make sense one bit. You use the stance of overwhelming confusion to try and appear right, when in reality....your dead wrong.

Merely because one person lacks comprehension doesn't mean everyone else does.  Use of words is integral to a text-based medium, (like these forums), as is reading comprehension.  I'm not responsible for your lack of either skill.  Lastly, your mere empty declaration that reasoned arguements are "dead wrong", (with the addition of the preceding grammatical error of "your" instead of "you're"), is specious.  

You can post whatever you want, but after this, there will be no more responses to you.

You keep saying that and I keep waiting for it to be true.

[Annella]

Ashley: This was my first post in this thread:

Girls, save yourself for that man you are going to marry. There's something very special giving that gift to the one you love on your wedding day. As old fashioned as it sounds, there is a blessing in it.

Not exactly anything for you and qon to "jump" on. So who actually got this started? You were not addressed until you and qon decided to put in some "digs". Now you are saying I singled you out? Not hardly.

[falcon9]

Your entitled to your opinion. And......this is a public forum. Anyone can say what they want.

If so, others are entitled to opinions which dissent from yours without your false accusations of 'following around to harass', (while you hypocritically 'harass' others who aren't xtian).  There's a simple solution to this non-dilemma; don't reply to posts in a public forum with nonsensical empty declarations in lieu of reasoning.

[Annella]

falcon9 you are blocked. All I see is your name and the "blocked" box. I'm not reading your responses so if you are addressing me, your wasting your time.

[falcon9]

falcon9 you are blocked. All I see is your name and the "blocked" box. I'm not reading your responses so if you are addressing me, your wasting your time.

So much for those empty 'promises' not to reply, huh?

This 'hide-and-go-post' thing of hers may seem childish, but actually it's her best bet - given the complete lack of reasoned refutation. There's a valid reason that such is known as 'blind faith'.  The amusing aspect to the 'ostrich' tactic is that anyone else can still see the posted replies.

p.s.: it's still "you're" in context, not "your". 
p.p.s.: are you stalking me by making not-reply replies now?

[bigedshult]

I was 29 and had a good time with her we squer dances be for we has sex.