God is a Fake

[falcon9]

While your latest posts barely fall under the "discuss" part of D+D, they fail to qualify as legitimate "debate".  Yes, you are "entitled" to believe whatever nonsense floats your boat, just as I am "entitled" to challenge unsupported opinions/assertions/beliefs. I can't help it if rationality disturbs the pseudo-comfort of your irrationality.  This should not prevent you from burying your head in the sand, putting your hands over your ears or, clinging desparately to blind faith.

ok there sweetie...calm down before you have a stroke and can't remember your BIG words, gosh I'd feel so bad.

Nominally, attempted condescension doesn't work while you're 'looking up' however, there is still a small amount of curiousity about what words you consider are too "BIG".  For all know about the constrictions upon your comprehension, "the" is too big a word for you so, I'm requesting clarification.  Surely you aren't implying that I dumb things down for you, are you?

[falcon9]

huh??  I posted a quote for her and her only.

In a public forum?  It wasn't an email or IM; others read it and replied.  Tough. 

I wasn't the author of the quote hence, wasn't gossiping at all.  You have a strange interpretation of things in this forum, makes me wonder about your interpretation of bigger things...

The "intrepretation" was that you were using the quote, (which no one said was yours), as a side-swipe gossipy post, (gossipy since you just admitted that the quote was "for her and her only", yet was publically posted).  Take a long look at your own misinterpretations and poor interpretations before poking at motes or underwear.

[SherylsShado]

huh??  I posted a quote for her and her only.

In a public forum?  It wasn't an email or IM; others read it and replied.  Tough. 

And they used improper forum quoting techniques, again...tough.  I was so over it along time ago---why aren't you?  Why is it that when you ask a question and then I give you an explanation...you come up with this "all-need-to-be-right" attitude?   Don't ask questions, don't re-quote me if you just want to live in your own little fantasy world because I might give you an explanation that you of course don't want to hear---but you did post in a public forum and all, so tough.

[SherylsShado]

The "intrepretation" was that you were using the quote, (which no one said was yours), as a side-swipe gossipy post, (gossipy since you just admitted that the quote was "for her and her only", yet was publically posted).  Take a long look at your own misinterpretations and poor interpretations before poking at motes or underwear.

ok, here's another "duh" moment.  You're STILL on the "gossip" thing?  That entire post that contained that quote never mentioned your name so what's the problem?  There's no FC rule stating people can't post awesome quotes.  You're being outrageously paranoid...

[duroz]

wow, it's like neither ever finished grade school.  One can post Quote from: SherylsShado on Today at 02:38:44 pm above the quote if it pleases however, when one posts "jcribb" and then the quote, proper posting says this is to indicate that jcribb said the quote.  If one was trying to address her, then one should have posted the quote and then addressed her before or after the quote---NOT with it.  DUH!

Uh NO if I was indicating that jcribb "said the quote", I would have posted it thusly:

Thanks for your input, though! Appreciate it!

[SherylsShado]

Nominally, attempted condescension doesn't work while you're 'looking up' however, there is still a small amount of curiousity about what words you consider are too "BIG".  For all know about the constrictions upon your comprehension, "the" is too big a word for you so, I'm requesting clarification.  Surely you aren't implying that I dumb things down for you, are you?

Seriously?  I mean "seriously"??  I have to explain that simple post to you?  (ok, now I KNOW you're trolling but I'll explain it to you anyway)...
1.) duh and duh...   I don't look up to you.
2.) I don't consider ANY words "too big"...I just like to joke with you about your fondness of big words.  Haven't you ever had anyone joke around with you before?
3.) I never implied (that I'm aware of) that you dumb things down for me, you certainly don't need to...unless you're exhausted.  

[falcon9]

And they used improper forum quoting techniques, again...tough.  I was so over it along time ago---why aren't you? 

I was, until you and 'hey you' kept bringing it up.

Why is it that when you ask a question and then I give you an explanation...you come up with this "all-need-to-be-right" attitude? 

I don't.  Questions are asked and whether or not someone answers or dodges them is up to others.  If answered, (not just replied to), it is reasonable to examine them for accuracy - nothing personal, I do this with everyone, (including me).
  

Don't ask questions, don't re-quote me if you just want to live in your own little fantasy world ...

How does my quoting your words become me living in a fantasy world?  They're your words, hence, your fantasies.

... because I might give you an explanation that you of course don't want to hear---

That's not accurate; if you offer an irrational explanation, I may question it, (it isn't that I "don't want to hear" irrational explanations, even though that's all that's been presented thusfar and a change would be nice).
 

[duroz]

You and duroz; you and Falconer; were also "gossiping."

You tell me or show me ANY posts where I was gossiping.... ....posts I made were made directly in response TO the (a) poster, I did NOT talk ABOUT somebody else.

[duroz]

Seriously?  I mean "seriously"??

duh and duh

You REALLY posted these words...(but I guess it would really be THIS word, twice)?

[falcon9]

The "intrepretation" was that you were using the quote, (which no one said was yours), as a side-swipe gossipy post, (gossipy since you just admitted that the quote was "for her and her only", yet was publically posted).  Take a long look at your own misinterpretations and poor interpretations before poking at motes or underwear.

ok, here's another "duh" moment.  You're STILL on the "gossip" thing?

Not as long as you're admitting it was, I'm done making that point.
 

That entire post that contained that quote never mentioned your name so what's the problem?

Here's where context comes into play. 

You're being outrageously paranoid...

Okay, you meant the quote to apply to "jcribb16" then?

[jcribb16]

And they used improper forum quoting techniques, again...tough.  I was so over it along time ago---why aren't you? 

I was, until you and 'hey you' kept bringing it up.

Why is it that when you ask a question and then I give you an explanation...you come up with this "all-need-to-be-right" attitude? 

I don't.  Questions are asked and whether or not someone answers or dodges them is up to others.  If answered, (not just replied to), it is reasonable to examine them for accuracy - nothing personal, I do this with everyone, (including me).
  

Don't ask questions, don't re-quote me if you just want to live in your own little fantasy world ...

How does my quoting your words become me living in a fantasy world?  They're your words, hence, your fantasies.

... because I might give you an explanation that you of course don't want to hear---

That's not accurate; if you offer an irrational explanation, I may question it, (it isn't that I "don't want to hear" irrational explanations, even though that's all that's been presented thusfar and a change would be nice).
 

Falcon9, my sn is jcribb16.  Please call me that or jcribb - I have respected your wishes about your sn.  You have ignored mine and have called me jbribb and "hey you."  I am asking the same respect, sir.

[SherylsShado]

@falcon9 

Not as long as you're admitting it was, I'm done making that point.

I didn't admit to anything...

Okay, you meant the quote to apply to "jcribb16" then?

No, I said what I meant---the quote was FOR "jcribb". 

Are you sure you belong in a discussion forum when you can't comprehend the basics of simple discussion?  You're looking pitiful tonite (seriously, honestly...nothing else intended).  Perhaps you need to get some good rest and try again tomorrow...

[falcon9]

(ok, now I KNOW you're trolling but I'll explain it to you anyway)...

Asking you which words you considered to be "BIG words" isn't trolling.  

1.) duh and duh...   I don't look up to you.

I didn't say you did.  What I directly implied was that under the definition of 'condescending', your attempt failed.

2.) I don't consider ANY words "too big"...I just like to joke with you about your fondness of big words.  Haven't you ever had anyone joke around with you before?

A "joke" which is of hostile intent, (and you can't accurately claim that they were politely intended now), is probably 'funnier' to the one showing prejudice against "big" words.  These are not "big" words in my vocabulary since I use them all the time, (as you've seen).  Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious would be a big word I rarely use, (btw, that's "signifying roughly "Atoning for educability through delicate beauty").
 

3.) I never implied (that I'm aware of) that you dumb things down for me, you certainly don't need to...unless you're exhausted.  

By previously mentioning the use of "big words" several times, that was the tacit implication, (such implication being to use smaller words).

[falcon9]

Not as long as you're admitting it was, I'm done making that point.

I didn't admit to anything...

I didn't think you would however, your "the quote was for her and her only", (yet was publically posted), is niminally 'gossip', regardless of whether you admit or not.

No, I said what I meant---the quote was FOR "jcribb". 

So, a post made in a public forum where any member reading that forum can, (but it wasn't intended for anyone else), is _not_ gossip now?  Next, you'll be redfining 'rock' as 'an edible substance'?
 

Are you sure you belong in a discussion forum when you can't comprehend the basics of simple discussion?

While unravelling such simple convolutions can be a little tedious, I've never demonstrated overt incomprehensibility, (with the possible exception of being unable to comprehend the circularity of having 'faith' because one believes). 

You're looking pitiful tonite (seriously, honestly...nothing else intended). 

As mentioned, it may be tedious to respond to multiple trollings by the two of you, I've replied in context to most of them, (even some of the repetitious ones).

[falcon9]

Falcon9, my sn is jcribb16.  Please call me that or jcribb - I have respected your wishes about your sn.  You have ignored mine and have called me jbribb and "hey you."  I am asking the same respect, sir.

I'll take it under advisement.