Everyone, should recognize and celebrate the diversity in our various populations and everyone has the right to be proud of who they are in regards to race, sex, orientation or what have you.
The issue that I have with some always throwing out the "we are all one...." comment is the very real historical and present fact that attempts of forced assimilation has and is being directed toward my Peoples, as well as many other demographics, with verying degress of success. even to the point that many millions have had their lives taken, simply for wanting to excercise their right to be themselves and honor their Ancestors. So Im sure we can all appreciate the sensitivity there.
As for the article linked to in my OP, the author failed to mention one thing that I think is very important in regards to this issue. That being the origine of the term "redskin".
"The Term Redskin
Dear Editor; It was brought to my attention that some were asking if the term "redskin" was really offensive to Indians and that they would like to hear from us on this subject. Well, here you are...I am Blackfoot, Cherokee and Choctaw...and yes, the term is extremely offensive to me. Let me explain why. Back not so long ago, when there was a bounty on the heads of the Indian people...the trappers would bring in Indian scalps along with the other skins that they had managed to trap or shoot. These scalps brought varying prices as did the skins of the animals. The trappers would tell the trading post owner or whoever it was that he was dealing with, that he had 2 bearskins, a couple of beaver skins...and a few scalps. Well, the term "scalp" offended the good Christian women of the community and they asked that another term be found to describe these things. So, the trappers and hunters began using the term "redskin"...they would tell the owner that they had bearskin, deer skins....and "redskins." The term came from the *bleep* mess that one saw when looking at the scalp...thus the term "red"...skin because it was the "skin" of an "animal" just like the others that they had...so, it became "redskins". So, you see when we see or hear that term...we don't see a football team...we don't see a game being played...we don't see any "honor"...we see the *bleep* pieces of scalps that were hacked off of our men, women and even our children...we hear the screams as our people were killed...and "skinned" just like animals. So, yes, Mr./Ms. Editor...you can safely say that the term is considered extremely offensive.
In Struggle,
Tina Holder
Mesa, Az."
http://www.aics.org/mascot/redskins.htmlI honestly believe that the vast majority of folks who use the term mean no offense what so ever but are simply unaware of why the term may be found offensive by some others, hence, my little attempt an education.
The same thing happens with people who use the term "squaw" while being totally oblivious to the fact that the term comes from a French word depicting a certain part of the female anatomy. Now, who of us would not be offended to hear someone call our Mother/Sister/daughter etc, a c*nt?
Falconer.....hows it going Bro? Oh, I've been kinna busy but will poke my head in here from time to time....good to see you all.