1.) Your inability to reproduce any unanswered challenges proves that they do not exist.
It isn't an "inability", it's a lack of desire to comply with your inane 'request'. Further, that information remains available in previous and documented post threads therefore, it does exist. Conclusively, you've lied about this, (regardless of your bland denials which contradict fact).
If they do exist, reproduce them as proof. If not, stop using diversions and telling me to read through 30 pages of posts to find unanswered challenges that do not exist. Much appreciated.
There is no need to reproduce what exists as documented records of this thread. Again, if you are either too inattentive or too lazy to recall what was said during a conversation, this indicates that you are either unable to keep track of the conversation, (despite a readily available record of it in print), or that you are attempting to initiate another repetitious loop wherein you blithely make unsupported assertions, (and when challenged to substantiate them, keep asking me to repeat those challenges). While I've no way of knowing if this has ever worked for you before, it isn't going to work for you now.
2.) I am not unable to keep track of the discussion, rather am unable to read your mind as to what nonexistent unanswered challenges they are referring to.
There is no mind-reading requirement in relation to keeping track of a discussion which you are participating in. Since the contents of this discussion are available as a textual record of this thread, it can only be concluded that you are indeed unable to keep track of this discussion, (despite your repetitiously baseless denials to the contrary).
If you continue to refuse to reproduce them and evade the request with your petty “find them yourself” response it will be taken as proof that these unanswered challenges are nonexistent.
Your concluded "proof" is an invalid and unsupported opinion, (i.e., it lacks substantive evidence ... actually, no evidence at all). The conclusion is inaccurate since the information which you keep insisting you cannot find is available to anyone reading the previous posts in this thread. Again, you inability to locate or, recall what _you_ wrote is hardly a major concern of mine.
3.) You are still trying to evade the request of reproducing the challenge.
Incorrect; the request hasn't been evaded since I've repeatedly refused to grant it, (thus rebuking it head-on).
Therefore, I see that we both agree that these challenges do not exist which is why they are impossible for you to reproduce. Any response otherwise will prove false since your actions show they are nonexistent. If not, prove it by showing them now.
Your display of sophistry in lieu of logical reasoning is unimpressive. Previous posts in this thread are not "impossible ... to reproduce" since they are available to anyone who isn't too lazy to find them herself. Your premise is therefore invalid and conclusions drawn from that invalid premise are invalid.
4.) Your claim of an endless loop of circular non-reasoning has been dismissed as the attempt to evade reproducing nonexistent unanswered challenges that it is.
You can try dismissing anything you wish however, the evidence of your endless loop exists in the form of the 3-4 most recently posted endless loops of yours repetitiously 'requesting' information which has already been posted and is still available to you. Unless you're denying your repetitious insistance that someone else do your research for you, (which wouldn't surprise anyone, given your documented record of blandly denying your own posted words).
5.) Your petty attempt at a play on words (instruction vs. suggestion) has been dismissed.
That isn't any sort of "play on words"; it illuminated the difference in meanings between what I actually wrote and what you tried to interpret. As stated, these words are in English and your dubious 'interpreter skills' are not required.
6.) Your claim that you remember every single aspect of this conversation is likely false as it has been going on for days.
No, it's been going on for weeks however, what you believe to be "likely false" is merely your opinion without evidence. As it happens, there aren't that many separate aspects of this discussion to recall since most of them consist of your repetitions, (I remember what I wrote and it isn't clear why you don't remember what you wrote).
I am not claiming not to know what we are discussing, merely that I have not memorized 30 pages of thread as this is not THAT important to my life.
There's no need to "memorize" when a written record documenting what was posted is readily available to anyone reading this thread.
To summarize-
I am politely asking that you list these challenges in a numbered list. If you do so then I will answer these challenges.
In turn, I am refusing your request, (not for the 'reasons' you've falsely stipulated), because the information you are repeatedly 'requesting' is already available to you.
Also, there will be no further need of discussion between the two of us as there will be nothing to debate.
Only one of us has been debating; the other has been dodging challenges to substantiate their unsupported claims and repeating 'demands' that those challenges be reposted because she can't remember the context and contents of a discussion she's been in for weeks.
Your statement that I am lying about the information being present or not present in the post is false. My point is that it is absolutely impossible for me to read your mind and know what “challenges” you are referring to. The assumption that they are nonexistent is made by your obvious inability to reproduce these challenges. Your continuing evasion of this request shows lack of evidence and is further proving that the challenges HAVE in fact been answered, or simply that you do not WANT them to be answered. Please stop wasting my time and dwelling on this subject.
If you want them answered- POST THEM
If you do not want them answered- STOP BRINGIN G THEM UP
These two logical options will likely be ignored by you, and will only further prove that your claims are false.
Your attempt at sounding superior by defining an “unsupported opinion” has been duly noted. It actually shows that you are NOT superior and that you are trying desperately to appear as though to are to make up for it. This is not helping your argument.
Your petty word play (evade vs. refused) has been disregarded. Upon the use of either word the result is still the same, you refuse to reproduce the supposed “challenges”. This refusal shows lack of existence or a lack of wanting them answered. Either way, your dwelling on the subject is an annoying waste of time as it could easily be solved by your reproduction of such challenges. If they are actually in this thread- reproduce them. Since you claimed to know every ‘facet” of this whole conversation, you can likely do so from memory.
I did not claim that previous posts were impossible to reproduce, rather that UNANSWERED CHALLENGES were impossible to reproduce. Your attempt at twisting my words has been denied. If these unanswered challenges do exist you will reproduce in your response (since you will not it is proven that they do not exist or that you do not want them answered).
It is true that I have repeated myself in this debate. That is not anything I am denying. The reasoning for the repetition is your lack of acknowledging what I say, leading me to belief you did not read it or did not comprehend it and that I needed to be restated. Sorry for that confusion.
I am not “trying” to dismiss, instead I AM dismissing- however your attempt at changing the actual dismissal to a mere attempt is amusing. You are the actual one who is operating in an endless loop. I will explain why so you can understand. You continuously bring up “unanswered challenges.” Since you are the one claiming their existence, you should provide evidence by quoting them directly. Your indirect references to them are useless as this is a 30 page thread and you made no specific examples as to where they can be found and instead have just repeatedly said “in above posts” and similar phrases.
Be mature, show the proof or drop the subject. It isn’t hard. If it exists, show it.
Your accusation of me denying my own words is absolutely false. Please provide evidence for this empty accusation.
Your insult to my intelligence has been ignored as an immature insult that does not deserve a response.
Weeks are made up of days, so if a conversation has been going on for weeks it has also been going on for days. This attempt to sound superior by correcting me is ignorant.
You claim that “likely false” is an opinion is absolutely true. I never claimed it as fact so I am not sure why you felt the need to state it was an opinion, but good job observing the difference between opinion and fact.
Your claim that I do not remember what I wrote is false. I DO remember what I wrote, I simply cannot read your mind as to which part of it you are claiming is an “unanswered challenge.” Hope that clears up your confusion.
It is obvious that the 30 pages are available- however your only reference to the part which you are talking about is that they are “unanswered challenges.” It is impossible for me to know which part you are referring to as you refuse to point out such nonexistent challenges.
It is true that only one of us is debating, and that the other (you) is dodging challenges to prove what you are saying.
You REPEATEDLY claim that the challenges exist on this thread, yet cannot pinpoint when or where they were posted. Tsk tsk tsk…show the evidence you claim exists or lose all credibility.
Since it is clear you will not reproduce any challenges I would like to say that I do not wish to discuss further any of the petty insults and superior accusations you continuously have been making. From now on please do not bring up these insults or word plays. This is not a “terroristic demand”, merely a request. It is likely that I will not respond to much more of the content you post until you reproduce the challenges you claim. This is not an “or else” challenge, merely a decision not to waste my time answering empty accusations that will not be supported by the quotes that supposedly exist. If you do post content that I do not reply to- I would like to let you know beforehand that this is not a dodge, an evasion, or any other defense tactic. It is simply a decision not to waste my time whenever you have chosen to leave out a significant portion of the debate due to lack of evidence that you claim is so readily available but will not reproduce.
Community Forum
Topic: Do you believe in the afterlife? (Read 44752 times)
