I'd like to say before I go any further, that some people who are opposed to God, or even the possibility to consider God, are going to always rationalize and/or explain away anything that a God believer will attempt to share. To them, all evidence put forward is not evidence to them and would be considered useless because they have concluded that there is absolutely no God. Christians, on the other hand, will also try to prove the evidences of God and disprove what the evolutionists are trying to prove. It's just a never-ending circle and will stay that way until the end of time. Nevertheless, people on both sides will always continue to try and prove their side. With that said and behind me, I'll try to continue on.
I haven't concluded that there is no god or gods or...as I like to put it...metaphysical properties. I just said they can only exist in a speculative manner. The specified defined gods that have human attributes, run-of-the-mill stories, that are from ancient superstitious times? The one's that are overbloated in today's society? Yes, since it's so skewed and completely obvious that they're myths.
http://www.bigmyth.com/webpages/2_eng_myths.htmRemember what you should be pushing for-- it isn't really proof of a deity. That leaves room for every possible concept, and (no offense here) it shows that you're not too serious about your own god. Evolutionists have their undeniable evidence with visual and interactive proof. I've told you about some of them. I used to be adamantly against the proof of it until I actually just listened and studied it. I'm glad I did.
1. Let's look at the earth. Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life. No other planet has that given (or at least that hasn't been discovered.) The earth is also located from the sun at just the right distance to not be torched or frozen. It also is perfectly located the right amount of distance from the moon. This involves the tides gravitational pull, the tides moving the water, and also the mystery of the oceans and waters being held back from covering the earth again. One thing I remember learning in science is that water in the winter freezes from the top - that way fish can still swim in the water and live. Just these things alone do not support evolution. They support some kind of creator or designer that knew what exactly was needed for everything to work together, in and organized way.
**But yet, ""The greatest scientists have been struck by how strange this is. There is no logical necessity for a universe that obeys rules, let alone one that abides by the rules of mathematics. This astonishment springs from the recognition that the universe doesn't have to behave this way. It is easy to imagine a universe in which conditions change unpredictably from instant to instant, or even a universe in which things pop in and out of existence.
This is, again, an eye-of-the-beholder and a blind watch-maker argument. You seem to think that everything you labelled here was made
specifically for us, whereas you completely forget the notion that everything was made
around those things nature brought into existence. Pretty much your argument dulls down to the metaphor of "God made kitchens for cockroaches only".
None of these things you listed are perfect.
1.) Earth is not perfectly placed from the sun. The orbit it takes is not symmetrical either. It's just within a narrow area called a habitable zone. Within it lies a semi-narrow range of attributes which allowed for the emergence of life and evolution . Once evolution started, life naturally evolved to fit the conditions on this planet. Not perfectly, but enough to survive and reproduce. Besides that, another planet has been discovered that has this too-
http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2010/09/30/planet_found_in_habitable_zone/Considering the trillions of planets that are probably out there, it's easy to conclude that we probably aren't the only gem in this universe.
2.) The moon is not perfectly located at the right amt of distance either. Infact it's actually slowly moving away year by year (3 cm)! If it were perfect, we would not have random tidal distortions
anywhere. Rather, the gravitational force between earth and the moon would have to be absolutely perfect for ideal tip-top planet condition. Ours just seems like shabby design.
3.) Water freezes according to the heat it loses. Naturally heat rises, so the surface of water will be the first to freeze unless the cooling is being delivered to another location; the water at the surface loses energy to the cold air, so it freezes first. Again, my point here is that life arose
around these natural principles. Not all at once.
"The seed of everything that has happened in the Universe was planted in that first instant; every star, every planet and every living creature in the Universe came into being as a result of events that were set in motion in the moment of the cosmic explosion...The Universe flashed into being, and we cannot find out what caused that to happen.
Yep. I'd like to know, but I'm not flipping out and stuffing it with something superstitious to make me feel more comfortable about existence. It's a mysteryyyyy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC4jZKSU8G4&feature=relatedThey still don't know the cause, but can't accept that God was already there and caused it to happen. Instead they keep trying their best to disprove that God had anything to do with it. Actually that there is no God and it just could not happen that way
You act like science is ruthlessly out to kill the god concept. It's not. As it progresses, it just keeps unwillingly hitting religious foundational beliefs. What else could one expect?
"Look! Fire! God made it!"
"How do you know?"
"It would only make sense because nobody knows how it came to be!"
"Well let's try to figure that out just to be sure! I'll grab some sticks and rub them together. Maybe you can go find some flint rocks and try th--"
"STOP TRYING TO DISPROVE GOD!"