October Promotion #1: Costumes

[Alyia72]

My daughter in her Foofa costume her grandma made her. Foofa is from yo gabba gabba for those that are not familiar with the annoying cartoon lol. I posted a few pics because the sign with my user name was hard to read because she did not want to hold it and kept waving it around lol.


And this is a pic of what foofa looks like in the cartoon for those that have no idea what foofa is.

[Longoria11]

well not only did she NOT want to take a picture i could find tape to tape the piece of paper next to or on here and she didnt hold it up right!   hope this is ok!!!


her pirate costume





her Mowgli costume
[spoiler]




and for those of you who dont know this is who MOWGLI is LOL


[/spoiler]

let me know what u guys think!!

[Cuppycake]

I do not think you should have your child pictured without clothing even if it is cute. The pirate costume is adorable though.

[Longoria11]

i dont see anything wrong  shes always naked.. and its a halloween costume...

[Cuppycake]

i dont see anything wrong  shes always naked.. and its a halloween costume...

I didn't say there is anything wrong with it. It is just that there are people out there that will look at your child in a not so innocent way and this is a public venue. I was only looking out for you and your sweet baby.

[briannajeanxo]

awesome promo! ill be back with a picture of a super cute kitty

[Longoria11]

Under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256), child pornography is defined as any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where 

the production of the visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or


the visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or


the visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.   
Federal law (18 U.S.C. §1466A) also criminalizes knowingly producing, distributing, receiving, or possessing with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that

depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene, or


depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, *bleep*-genital, or oral-*bleep*, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex and such depiction lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Sexually explicit conduct is defined under federal law (18 U.S.C. §2256) as actual or simulated sexual intercourse (including genital-genital, oral-genital, *bleep*-genital, or oral-*bleep*, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex), bestiality, masturbation, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.


thats againt the law..

a child in a costume just standing there is not....


kohler if you want and think i NEED to take this picture down.. i will...

[Longoria11]

I was like   when I seen the pictures. Aint that against the law and qualify as child *bleep*?

If that's child *bleep*, so are all diaper commercials, and child underwear ads and anything else that shows topless babies/toddlers/young children.

If it's not sexual, it's not *bleep*.

[lightningclix]

I was like   when I seen the pictures. Aint that against the law and qualify as child *bleep*?

If that's child *bleep*, so are all diaper commercials, and child underwear ads and anything else that shows topless babies/toddlers/young children.

If it's not sexual, it's not *bleep*.

I can not believe that this is happening here!      

Cute pics Longoria11.  Remember, it's your daughter, so don't feel bad or let people put you down.  Let the Nay-Sayer's do their thing...

[Longoria11]

I was like   when I seen the pictures. Aint that against the law and qualify as child *bleep*?

If that's child *bleep*, so are all diaper commercials, and child underwear ads and anything else that shows topless babies/toddlers/young children.

If it's not sexual, it's not *bleep*.

I can not believe that this is happening here!      

Cute pics Longoria11.  Remember, it's your daughter, so don't feel bad or let people put you down.  Let the Nay-Sayer's do their thing...

thank u.. im done trying to prove that its NOT child pornography or that anything is wrong with it

[Cuppycake]

I was like   when I seen the pictures. Aint that against the law and qualify as child *bleep*?

It seems like it to me. I wouldn't post pictures of my children without clothing on that is for sure.

[hitgirl420]

this seems super awesome i'll have to get my daughter in her costume and do it

[home_teachin]

My son (13). I hope you can see my username on the paper. Longoria, your kids are too cute. I love the Mowgli costume, just hope it isn't cold where you live. 

[Longoria11]

thank u!!

[xdrummermommyx]

Did I miss it?!