Christian System for Debating

[falcon9]

Oh just knock it off.  You do so enjoy it -

You have no idea as to what I enjoy and are simply guessing, based upon your own misperceptions.
 

... if you didn't have Christians to pick on.  You continually enjoy picking on some Christians, like newbies ...

Challenging specious beliefs is not "picking on" anyone; it's challenging the empty claims they post.  Non-believers don't insist that religious adherents are "picking on" them due to mind-blindness however, you are as free to fabricate falsehoods as I am to refute and reject them. If you choose to continue doing so, I may choose to designate your lies as such.

and others who don't know what to say or how to react when you bully them.  Yes, that's what it is - bullying. 

Bull.  That's what you're calling opposing their religious proselytizing, (which could be characterized as "bullying" if you want to trade mud-slinging terms).
 

But when the disrespectful comments and disparaging remarks ...

Your continued attempts at suppression, repression and bullying into censorship continue to fail.

"Religion can never reform mankind, because Religion is slavery."
-- Robert G. Ingersoll

[jcribb16]

Oh just knock it off.  You do so enjoy it -

You have no idea as to what I enjoy and are simply guessing, based upon your own misperceptions.
 

... if you didn't have Christians to pick on.  You continually enjoy picking on some Christians, like newbies ...

Challenging specious beliefs is not "picking on" anyone; it's challenging the empty claims they post.  Non-believers don't insist that religious adherents are "picking on" them due to mind-blindness however, you are as free to fabricate falsehoods as I am to refute and reject them. If you choose to continue doing so, I may choose to designate your lies as such.

and others who don't know what to say or how to react when you bully them.  Yes, that's what it is - bullying. 

Bull.  That's what you're calling opposing their religious proselytizing, (which could be characterized as "bullying" if you want to trade mud-slinging terms).
 

But when the disrespectful comments and disparaging remarks ...

Your continued attempts at suppression, repression and bullying into censorship continue to fail.

"Religion can never reform mankind, because Religion is slavery."
-- Robert G. Ingersoll

It is not challenging with respect when a poster is:

*Hateful towards certain persons, groups, or denominations. (Ex. Christians mostly receive your hateful remarks, quotes, and pics.

*Creating a disproportionate number of posts to disrupt a conversation or a thread.  (Ex. Bible Verse Threads)

*Making statements that are deliberately inflammatory.  (Mainly towards Christians)

*Interfering with conversations or posts (Ex. Bible Verse Threads) which inhibits the ability of others to enjoy that thread.

I'm really surprised that, with all of your knowledge, big words, and apparent enjoyment of debate, that you have conveniently or deliberately overlooked the respectful part of debating, in which both sides can gain better knowledge and perspective. 

[falcon9]

It is not challenging with respect when a poster is:

*Hateful towards certain persons, groups, or denominations. (Ex. Christians mostly receive your hateful remarks, quotes, and pics.

The characterization of "hateful" constitutes an inherently biased opinion, not factual accuracy.

*Creating a disproportionate number of posts to disrupt a conversation or a thread.  (Ex. Bible Verse Threads)

There's no 'free pass' for unopposed proselytizing so, go ahead and characterize replies in opposition as 'disruptive'.  Religious propganda is 'disruptive' to others.

*Making statements that are deliberately inflammatory.  (Mainly towards Christians)

That seems fair, given the inflammatory 'flaming' alleged xtians are hucking up.

*Interfering with conversations or posts (Ex. Bible Verse Threads) which inhibits the ability of others to enjoy that thread.

You keep laboring under the delusion that these forums/threads are somehow 'private' or, exclusive xtian country clubs and others will continue to dispute that notion with the truth; that they aren't.  These are FC forums and the trheads are public, not private.

I'm really surprised that, with all of your knowledge, big words, and apparent enjoyment of debate, that you have conveniently or deliberately overlooked the respectful part of debating, in which both sides can gain better knowledge and perspective.  

Would you 'respect' a cannibal's religious beliefs or, debate them?  How about while they're seasoning you for the stewpot?