This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print

Topic: "Tough Love" is fine.  (Read 1172 times)

fc2

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
"Tough Love" is fine.
« on: April 15, 2012, 05:22:42 am »
Though I left 'tough love' behind me in my younger years, but here it is right in FusionCash Forum. Yuh know the reminders to read rules is cool, but to continue on typing down words of degradation to new members in FC is a bit outdated. Another pack of ill-mannered individuals is 'positive criticismers' LOL. These folks pop out of the wood work just to try and make your FC earnings, learnings, and posting times worse LOL  :angel11:.
FC2

fc2

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: "Tough Love" is fine.
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2012, 06:30:05 pm »
didn't tough love spring forth during the baby boom generation?
FC2

springsgardner

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Elite Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 933 (since 2011)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: "Tough Love" is fine.
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2012, 10:14:32 pm »
Though I left 'tough love' behind me in my younger years, but here it is right in FusionCash Forum. Yuh know the reminders to read rules is cool, but to continue on typing down words of degradation to new members in FC is a bit outdated. Another pack of ill-mannered individuals is 'positive criticismers' LOL. These folks pop out of the wood work just to try and make your FC earnings, learnings, and posting times worse LOL  :angel11:.

It would be nice if some of the unfriendly posts never took place. I looked at a thread tonight and saw an individual's posts that criticized the original poster for their beliefs. I was some what surprised since the original poster was asking for prayers. If someone thinks prayers are worthless, then why enter the thread and post rude comments? Let the person believe what they want. The odds of changing some one's mind in a FC forum is as likely as convincing a square that it should become a circle- not happening.

You can find me on Youtube!

falcon9

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 9741 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: "Tough Love" is fine.
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 11:07:54 pm »
It would be nice if some of the unfriendly posts never took place.

It might be equally nice were some superstitious religious "unfriendly" posts never took place however, both fall under the freedom to express their views on a public forum, (especially the off-topic & Debate+Discuss forums), much as some would want to censor what they don't like.

I looked at a thread tonight and saw an individual's posts that criticized the original poster for their beliefs.

That would be me; except that the beliefs of one specific poster were not being criticized individually, but generally, (e.g., concerning the general ineffectiveness of such evocative wishcraft rituals known as "prayer").

I was some what surprised since the original poster was asking for prayers. If someone thinks prayers are worthless, then why enter the thread and post rude comments?

Your comprehension skills become doubtful when you omit the expression that 'no storm lasts forever' and that current tough times will pass, (offered in lieu of 'prayer').  It never occurs to such persons as yourself that anyone can believe whatever nonsense they like however, by posting it in a public forum, they tacitly open such beliefs to dissenting views, (that is, there's nothing that says nonsensical beliefs get a 'free ride' when publically-posted).  Characterizing dissenting viewpoints as "rude" indicates a subjectively-biased opinion, (not one based upon accuracy).

Let the person believe what they want. The odds of changing some one's mind in a FC forum is as likely as convincing a square that it should become a circle- not happening.

Well, such a declaration of closed-mindedness just means that reasoning doesn't affect the declarer's beliefs, (and tacitly admits irrationality by making that overt declaration).

Once again, rather than complaining about dissenting points of view, (and tacitly wishing that they'd be censored), the simplest course of action is to use the "ignore" function to spare any 'delicate sensibilities'.
One can lead a horse to water however, if one holds the horse's head under, that horse will drown.

             

  • Print
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
1648 Views
Last post June 03, 2009, 05:36:30 pm
by discardedheart
6 Replies
2141 Views
Last post December 18, 2010, 09:04:02 am
by kqa
8 Replies
1678 Views
Last post September 12, 2011, 04:44:48 am
by cateyes1
27 Replies
4434 Views
Last post January 15, 2012, 02:34:00 pm
by Sendmicheck
41 Replies
6118 Views
Last post December 12, 2011, 06:36:03 pm
by kingozzy