War In Afghanistan...

[falcon9]

as i said again i thought so.. im done...

Apparently not.  If you are trying doing that 'last word' thing, it didn't work for the last one to try it either.

[sammywantsya]

Your lack of comprehension and reasoning abilities is astounding. <<<<< what does this means to you then...

[falcon9]

Your lack of comprehension and reasoning abilities is astounding. <<<<< what does this means to you then...

It means just what is stated; that you've provided evidence of a lack of comprehension and reasoning abilities.  Message IDs available upon request.  This post would be one of the message IDs provided.

[jcribb16]

Admin Staff please im just having good convo without any drama  this guy here trying to pick a fight with me on every thread i FN go too.. please handle this stalker... thank you...

If contacted by Admin, I will produced the posted message IDs showing evidence of your lying, (in your own words).  You are evidently a habitual liar and I will choose to refute your lies on a case by case basis.

And I will back her up with the "stalking" by you by also providing message numbers of totally different threads showing how you seem to specifically take her posts and respond sarcastically to her while appearing in the very same threads she is.

[falcon9]

Admin Staff please im just having good convo without any drama  this guy here trying to pick a fight with me on every thread i FN go too.. please handle this stalker... thank you...

If contacted by Admin, I will produced the posted message IDs showing evidence of your lying, (in your own words).  You are evidently a habitual liar and I will choose to refute your lies on a case by case basis.

And I will back her up with the "stalking" by you by also providing message numbers of totally different threads showing how you seem to specifically take her posts and respond sarcastically to her while appearing in the very same threads she is.

Go for it and I will provide additional message IDs showing not only replies made to other posters in other threads but, those threads where s/he posted and I did not reply, (or "stalk").  Every participant in these forums has the freedom to post replies to any other poster without speciously-falsew accusations of "stalking".  If you insist upon backing up a false accusation with tacit false accusations of your own, this will emerge as evidence of your bias and the lie of the accusation.

[sammywantsya]

Admin Staff please im just having good convo without any drama  this guy here trying to pick a fight with me on every thread i FN go too.. please handle this stalker... thank you...

If contacted by Admin, I will produced the posted message IDs showing evidence of your lying, (in your own words).  You are evidently a habitual liar and I will choose to refute your lies on a case by case basis.

And I will back her up with the "stalking" by you by also providing message numbers of totally different threads showing how you seem to specifically take her posts and respond sarcastically to her while appearing in the very same threads she is.

thank you so much for this clarification..

[jcribb16]

Admin Staff please im just having good convo without any drama  this guy here trying to pick a fight with me on every thread i FN go too.. please handle this stalker... thank you...

If contacted by Admin, I will produced the posted message IDs showing evidence of your lying, (in your own words).  You are evidently a habitual liar and I will choose to refute your lies on a case by case basis.

And I will back her up with the "stalking" by you by also providing message numbers of totally different threads showing how you seem to specifically take her posts and respond sarcastically to her while appearing in the very same threads she is.

Go for it and I will provide additional message IDs showing not only replies made to other posters in other threads but, those threads where s/he posted and I did not reply, (or "stalk").  Every participant in these forums has the freedom to post replies to any other poster without speciously-falsew accusations of "stalking".  If you insist upon backing up a false accusation with tacit false accusations of your own, this will emerge as evidence of your bias and the lie of the accusation.

Bullying is very obvious as well.  That is not debating and you know that.

[jcribb16]

Admin Staff please im just having good convo without any drama  this guy here trying to pick a fight with me on every thread i FN go too.. please handle this stalker... thank you...

If contacted by Admin, I will produced the posted message IDs showing evidence of your lying, (in your own words).  You are evidently a habitual liar and I will choose to refute your lies on a case by case basis.

And I will back her up with the "stalking" by you by also providing message numbers of totally different threads showing how you seem to specifically take her posts and respond sarcastically to her while appearing in the very same threads she is.

thank you so much for this clarification..

 

[falcon9]

Bullying is very obvious as well.  That is not debating and you know that.

"Bullying" is a subjective perception and requires definitive evidence, as opposed to biased opinion.  My posts show contextual debate of assertions made ratehr than "bullying" in the face of several false adoptions of a victim stance. These posts can be referenced by messaage ID however, if you choose to back a substantiated liar, that's your decision.

[jcribb16]

Bullying is very obvious as well.  That is not debating and you know that.

"Bullying" is a subjective perception and requires definitive evidence, as opposed to biased opinion.  My posts show contextual debate of assertions made ratehr than "bullying" in the face of several false adoptions of a victim stance. These posts can be referenced by messaage ID however, if you choose to back a substantiated liar, that's your decision.

At this point it's the matter of your "supported, unbiased, non-specious, always factual" views, along with others' "unsupported, biased, specious, not factual, non-accepted opinions" in regards to your shutting them down, not choosing to listen to their further reasons (because they aren't reason to you) which ultimately goads tempers, which then you can zero in on and question them on their attitudes.  Then when you start appearing in the very same threads, with some of the same posters who have gotten upset and frustrated, and you continue with the same treatment,  and also making unrelated remarks about their wording or maybe not understanding something, that starts getting a little creepy, feeling as if they're being stalked, and/or bullied.  Somebody is going to have had enough of it and turn you in. 

[falcon9]

At this point it's the matter of your "supported, unbiased, non-specious, always factual" views ...

As I stated, I endeavor to provide support, (whether evidentiary or, a logical reasoning process), for any refutations made.  If you were to go back and reread the posted exchanges, you'll notice that my replies are in _response_ to specious assertions/claims made.

...along with others' "unsupported, biased, specious, not factual, non-accepted opinions" in regards to your shutting them down, not choosing to listen to their further reasons (because they aren't reason to you)

They aren't "reason" using the definition of reason, (which isn't restricted to 'any excuse one wishes to throw out there').  This isn't according to some personal definition of reason that only I'm using.  As previously stated, a process of debate was engaged in, (at least on my part), which opponents engaged in, (thus refuting your contention of "shutting them down").

which ultimately goads tempers, which then you can zero in on and question them on their attitudes. 

The emotional responses of others are their own responsibility.  I don't often question others regarding their emotional attitudes since I preceive that as a personal matter.

Then when you start appearing in the very same threads, with some of the same posters who have gotten upset and frustrated, and you continue with the same treatment,  and also making unrelated remarks about their wording or maybe not understanding something, that starts getting a little creepy, feeling as if they're being stalked, and/or bullied.  Somebody is going to have had enough of it and turn you in. 

Your characterization is false, no unrelated remarks were made, (the replies made were directly-related to the context of previous remarks).  Once again, replying to any participant in any thread on these forums does not constitute "stalking".  This is especially true when several threads exist wherein the false accuser was not replied to.  However, continued false accusations of "stalking" will not be tolerated as a "point of view".  You keep make this false accusation and I'll keep proving, (with substantive evidence), that you're a liar.  If you want to take your lying to the level of Admin involvement, be assured that your one-side 'opinions' will be met with factual evidence.  Although I could consider your continued false accusations as "bullying" or "harassment", I choose not to.

[jcribb16]

At this point it's the matter of your "supported, unbiased, non-specious, always factual" views ...

As I stated, I endeavor to provide support, (whether evidentiary or, a logical reasoning process), for any refutations made.  If you were to go back and reread the posted exchanges, you'll notice that my replies are in _response_ to specious assertions/claims made.

...along with others' "unsupported, biased, specious, not factual, non-accepted opinions" in regards to your shutting them down, not choosing to listen to their further reasons (because they aren't reason to you)

They aren't "reason" using the definition of reason, (which isn't restricted to 'any excuse one wishes to throw out there').  This isn't according to some personal definition of reason that only I'm using.  As previously stated, a process of debate was engaged in, (at least on my part), which opponents engaged in, (thus refuting your contention of "shutting them down").

which ultimately goads tempers, which then you can zero in on and question them on their attitudes. 

The emotional responses of others are their own responsibility.  I don't often question others regarding their emotional attitudes since I preceive that as a personal matter.

Then when you start appearing in the very same threads, with some of the same posters who have gotten upset and frustrated, and you continue with the same treatment,  and also making unrelated remarks about their wording or maybe not understanding something, that starts getting a little creepy, feeling as if they're being stalked, and/or bullied.  Somebody is going to have had enough of it and turn you in. 

Your characterization is false, no unrelated remarks were made, (the replies made were directly-related to the context of previous remarks).  Once again, replying to any participant in any thread on these forums does not constitute "stalking".  This is especially true when several threads exist wherein the false accuser was not replied to.  However, continued false accusations of "stalking" will not be tolerated as a "point of view".  You keep make this false accusation and I'll keep proving, (with substantive evidence), that you're a liar.  If you want to take your lying to the level of Admin involvement, be assured that your one-side 'opinions' will be met with factual evidence.  Although I could consider your continued false accusations as "bullying" or "harassment", I choose not to.

Goading, "bullying" of this one particular poster is absolutely going on in this very thread.  In this thread and another she asked you to leave her alone, yet you kept on.  Perhaps "harassment" is a better word for what you are doing to her, and that is not a false accusation.

[falcon9]

Goading, "bullying" of this one particular poster is absolutely going on in this very thread.  In this thread and another she asked you to leave her alone, yet you kept on.  Perhaps "harassment" is a better word for what you are doing to her, and that is not a false accusation.

You've looked up the definition of "harassment" by now, haven't you?  Replying to posts in a public forum is not what constitutes "harassment".  Neither can any replies made to "this particular poster" be accurately considered as "bullying".  On the contrary, the "particular poster" you've been defending posted a name-calling slur which was not reciprocated.  Being selective in your defense of name-calling is beneath you, isn't it?

[jcribb16]

Goading, "bullying" of this one particular poster is absolutely going on in this very thread.  In this thread and another she asked you to leave her alone, yet you kept on.  Perhaps "harassment" is a better word for what you are doing to her, and that is not a false accusation.

You've looked up the definition of "harassment" by now, haven't you?  Replying to posts in a public forum is not what constitutes "harassment".  Neither can any replies made to "this particular poster" be accurately considered as "bullying".  On the contrary, the "particular poster" you've been defending posted a name-calling slur which was not reciprocated.  Being selective in your defense of name-calling is beneath you, isn't it?

I also saw the continual baiting to the point of certain responses.  2 wrongs don't make a right.

[falcon9]

You've looked up the definition of "harassment" by now, haven't you?  Replying to posts in a public forum is not what constitutes "harassment".  Neither can any replies made to "this particular poster" be accurately considered as "bullying".  On the contrary, the "particular poster" you've been defending posted a name-calling slur which was not reciprocated.  Being selective in your defense of name-calling is beneath you, isn't it?

I also saw the continual baiting to the point of certain responses.  2 wrongs don't make a right.

"Baiting" is another way of claiming "goading" occurred.  Please provide substantive evidence which does not consist of perceptual opinion, (since that is not a substantive basis), for this claim.  As far as two wrongs not making a right, I agree.  They make a left.