This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print

  • Forced Drugging and Forced Vaccination of Children 5 1
Rating:  
Topic: Forced Drugging and Forced Vaccination of Children  (Read 955 times)

GUESSWORKZ

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 0x
Forced Drugging and Forced Vaccination of Children
« on: October 14, 2010, 12:54:31 pm »
If you disagree with your doctor regarding the medical treatment of your children, they can be taken away from you, put in a foster home, and you can be arrested for endangering the health and welfare of your child. There are many people jailed every year, put there for disagreeing with medical doctors and their policies. In order to break free from the clutches of organized medical crime, pharmaceutical drug cartels and the monstrous insurance companies, we must all work to change the unconstitutional laws that monopolize health care. Courts Order Kids To Take Drugs - Parents pressured to put kids on AZT, Ritalin, and other dangerous toxic drugs. Judges can constitutionally order controversial chemotherapy and drugs to be given to a child over the opposition of his parents.  Parents are medicating their children for fear of having them  hauled away by Child Protective Services.
This stunning news report finds that children, even toddlers as young as 2, are being given powerful psychotropic drugs in order to manage their behavior. Are these children being drugged because it is cheaper and easier than providing real care -- and because the practice is very lucrative for the pharmaceutical companies?

mattymatt79

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 0x
Re: Forced Drugging and Forced Vaccination of Children
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2010, 01:49:12 pm »
It's unfair, especially to parents like me that don't feel that children should be vaccinated. I looked at what my vaccines were when I was a child and compared it to what my now 9mo should be receiving. It's insane, vaccinations with so many different things. My pediatrician though understands my wife and mine situation and has agreed with us that we can put them off until shes at least 6 since we live away from people and can control who she's near. Also, the H1N1 has been taken off the shelves in other countries due to neurological disorders that have been showing up. It scares me to think that the dr.s administrating the shots couldn't even tell you what is actually in them.

MessiahMews

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Silver Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1193 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 0x
Re: Forced Drugging and Forced Vaccination of Children
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2010, 02:38:07 pm »
Children can be taken away from parents because the state has jurisdiction over them.  That came about because of marriage licenses (read contract with the state) and state issued birth certificates (another contract with the state)

Look up "Marriage License, Birth Certificates & #SSNs" in a Google search.  Also look up "Vaccination Liberation" and "vaccine package inserts".  The CDC Pink Book has the documents/pages of "vaccine Excipients" listed by Excipient and also listed by Vaccine.  Be sure look up "Vaccine Ingredients from Phy.Desk Ref.".

More on the birth certificate and marriage license issue...

From page 20 of the book...

HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN

Registration vs. Recording

       “Registration” comes from Latin “rex, regis” etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to whatever you ‘register’ - you hand legal title over to the Crown. When you register anything with the public, it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title - the right to use, not own, and for that use you will pay a ‘use’ tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as opposed to lawful taxes, excise and impost. So that it doesn’t appear that the government now owns the property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won’t suspect it, however, the NAME is owned by the government. If you choose rather to record your legal title to your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs.

       The best example of the effects of registration is the birth certificate. A bankrupt entity - city, state/province, country - cannot operate in commerce. So how do they manage? Since USA/CA have been bankrupt for decades, having no substance such as gold and silver to back it, the only asset it has are men and women and our labour.  We are the collateral for the interest on the loan of the World Bank. Each of us is registered, via the application for a birth certificate. The Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate and the bond is sold at a securities exchange and bought by the FRB/BoC, which then uses it as collateral to issue bank notes. The bond is held in trust for the Feds at the Depository Trust Corporation. We are the surety on said bonds. Our labour/energy is then payable at some future date. Hence we become the ‘transmitting utility’ for the transmission of energy. The USG/CAG, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labour, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of us all. We became nothing more than ‘human resources’ and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge and/or our consent, via the filing (registration) of our birth certificates.

       When mums apply for a birth certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State. Mum is left with equitable title of her baby whom she can use for a fee - a ‘use tax’ - and since the property does not belong to her, she has to treat it in the manner which the owner wants.

       Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President 1913 - 1921), "Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.

       They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

       This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.”
- Colonel Edward Mandell House

       This is why I coach those who intend to ‘marry’ not to sign anything. Centuries ago, a man put a ring on a woman’s finger and declared, “With this ring, I thee wed”. Family members were the witnesses and that was it. There was no state-issued licence to sign ... frightful! Children can be taken from their parents because of the marriage licence. Do not invite into your private contract a third party which happens to be public, cares not about the interests of the other two parties, and has every legal right to force them to acquiesce to its demands. Your marriage ceases to be your own; the third party will tell you if and when you can end the marriage; the third party will dictate that your children will:

1. require a birth certificate and SSN/SIN
2. require a gov’t-directed (AMA/CMA) doctor to attend to his health,
3. be vaccinated by mandate,
4. attend the Public Fool System,
5. be prescribed and drugged by Ritalin,
6. sign up with the armed forces, etc.
Your child will be a ‘ward of the state’ and the state will have prior say in what IT thinks is best for your child - you will not have jurisdiction over him.

       The birth certificate created a FICTION (the name of the baby in upper case letters). The state/ province sells the birth certificate to the Commerce Department of the corporations of USA/CA, which in turn places a bond on the birth certificate thereby making it a negotiable instrument, and placing the fiction, called a STRAWMAN, into the warehouse of the corporations of USA/CA. Representation for the created fiction was given to the BAR (British Accredited Registry/Regency), owned and operated by the Crown, for the purpose of contracting the fiction (which most of us think is ourselves) into a third party action. Do not underestimate the power behind this trick. It is to con us into contracting with the feds so that they can ‘legally’ confiscate our property. All these contracts have only our signatures on them because corporate fictions cannot contract (only natural beings have the right to contract - and the right not to contract).  Because there is no full disclosure - we are never told that we have just signed away what we believe to be our property - these contracts are fraudulent, and hence, we are still the lawful owner and the profit earned by the feds from selling securities (our property) belongs to us and must go into a fund for our benefit, otherwise it would be fraud. Not wanting to be charged with fraud, the feds had to create a remedy for us ...and hope we wouldn’t discover it.

       For decades, through its ‘public’ school system, the government has managed to deceive us about some very important facts. All facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our lives and are controlled by government and its agencies, via the issuance of licences. We have slowly and systematically been led to believe that any form of our names represents us, which is not so.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~



  • Print
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
1629 Views
Last post June 06, 2009, 05:07:40 pm
by msprettycute
0 Replies
837 Views
Last post September 28, 2010, 07:41:43 pm
by walksalone11
5 Replies
1688 Views
Last post January 29, 2011, 06:54:00 am
by Cuppycake
4 Replies
828 Views
Last post December 04, 2012, 12:08:57 pm
by natashaspy
2 Replies
469 Views
Last post April 13, 2018, 10:04:47 pm
by JediJohnnie