Forums becoming unbelievable

[falcon9]

Haters never win. I just think that's true about life, because negative energy always costs in the end.
~Tom Hiddleston

“Recalling some of the most spectacular horrors of history -- the burning of heretics and witches at the stake, the wholesale massacre of "heathens," and other no less repulsive manifestations of ctian 'civilization 'in Europe and elsewhere -- modern man is filled with pride in the "progress" accomplished, in one line at least, since the end of the dark ages of religious fanaticism.”
-- Savitri Devi

[jcribb16]

You're a spammer.

So are you - with your intolerance of threads allowed in this forum.

[jcribb16]

Haters never win. I just think that's true about life, because negative energy always costs in the end.
~Tom Hiddleston

Great quote!

[falcon9]

"Debate & Discuss
A place to have political, religious, and other divisive discussions.
Enter at your own risk!"

Now, I'm not sure what interpretation you are coming from, but those words political, religious, and other divisive discussions, sure sounds like Kohler is most definitely accomodating of "religious" threads and posts.

The caveat also includes the phrase "divisive discussions".  This means that religious discussions, (for instance), are not granted unopposed soapboxes.

I'm figuring if you don't like it and can't accept it, then you are the one with the problem of comprehension of religious threads included, which does not mean the threads/forum are/is only secular. 

Your lack of comprehension is not my responsibility; I didn't state that the forums or threads were restricted to secular topics, I indicated that FC was not specifically a religious/xtian forum, (that, as a business site, it is a secular one).

[squirrelgirl44]

The $3 posting bonus is the easiest $3 I make every single month on this site. I have been a member for years, and have probably made over $200 just from posting. Only respond to things that interest you.

[falcon9]

So are you - with your intolerance of threads allowed in this forum.

False; I'm not spamming multiple threads with specious religious propagandizing 'pictures', (and have rebuked only a portion of that spamming).  Your superficial inherent bias supporting such xtian spamming is as obvious as it is inane.

[remediagirl]

You're a spammer.

So are you - with your intolerance of threads allowed in this forum.

I bet it really is frustrating to some that they can't misconstrue an image....LOL

[jcribb16]

Just because haters can't stop thinking ...

False characterizations and attributions seem to be the forte of non-thinking xtian fundies.  Your post is further evidence supporting this contention.  "FC" does not stand for 'fundie xtian' forums; it stands for the unreligious/secular Fusioncash site.

No it doesn't.  It's Fusion Cash, a place to earn some extra cash.  The forum is an added bonus, for those who take advantage of wishing to post in it, including, at the point, receiving a bonus for 30 eligible posts a month.  It's neither labled Christian forum nor is it labled Secular forum.  Threads and posts of many different topics are allowed in this forum, some serious, some funny.  Some games, some support ones.  Some debates and discussions, which specifically says under the Debate & Discuss section,

"Debate & Discuss
A place to have political, religious, and other divisive discussions.
Enter at your own risk!"

Now, I'm not sure what interpretation you are coming from, but those words political, religious, and other divisive discussions, sure sounds like Kohler is most definitely accomodating of "religious" threads and posts.

I'm figuring if you don't like it and can't accept it, then you are the one with the problem of comprehension of religious threads included, which does not mean the threads/forum are/is only secular.  Speak to Kohler if this bothers you so bad. 

 
Here we go again, falcon9.      Your very explicit words typed from your own hand (I guess) say exactly what you said - You more than "indicated" secular - you said it stands for unreligious/secular...Are you really going to continue to rebut your very own words?  You're slipping with your intentions; along with misrepresenting your very own words against your very own rebuttal to yourself.   

[jcribb16]

"Debate & Discuss
A place to have political, religious, and other divisive discussions.
Enter at your own risk!"

Now, I'm not sure what interpretation you are coming from, but those words political, religious, and other divisive discussions, sure sounds like Kohler is most definitely accomodating of "religious" threads and posts.

The caveat also includes the phrase "divisive discussions".  This means that religious discussions, (for instance), are not granted unopposed soapboxes.

I'm figuring if you don't like it and can't accept it, then you are the one with the problem of comprehension of religious threads included, which does not mean the threads/forum are/is only secular. 

Your lack of comprehension is not my responsibility; I didn't state that the forums or threads were restricted to secular topics, I indicated that FC was not specifically a religious/xtian forum, (that, as a business site, it is a secular one).

This is being answered in a re-quote (in entirety) of your very own words, which prove you are making false claims (lies) of your very own original words.  Sheesh...

[jcribb16]

So are you - with your intolerance of threads allowed in this forum.

False; I'm not spamming multiple threads with specious religious propagandizing 'pictures', (and have rebuked only a portion of that spamming).  Your superficial inherent bias supporting such xtian spamming is as obvious as it is inane.

True and False.  While you are not spamming multiple threads with what you call "specious religious propagandizing pictures," (which is your opinion and right to say that); instead you are spamming multiple religious threads with intolerance, hateful words, and name calling.  You seem to be unable to accept that the religious threads are allowed in the forum and since you don't like them, you are continuing to spam them with your harassment of believers.

[jcribb16]

You're a spammer.

So are you - with your intolerance of threads allowed in this forum.

I bet it really is frustrating to some that they can't misconstrue an image....LOL

How true that is!

[falcon9]

... making false claims (lies) ...

I'm already aware of what you xtians do as those false claims and lies are archived.

List of xtian-instigated calling-out threads locked/removed by Admin/moderators:

"THE FINAL SOLUTION TO F9‏"
"Re: Kohler: Original posters' thread titles are being changed w/in threads"
"This would be hell for me"
"okay falcon9 I buddy I gotta ask"
"pray for Falcon9"
"Sorry,but i have to ask this"
"already in love=)"
"trollings people on the internet..."
"Hey Falcon"

[falcon9]

While you are not spamming multiple threads with what you call "specious religious propagandizing pictures," (which is your opinion and right to say that); instead you are spamming multiple religious threads with intole

No, those are dissenting/opposing viewpoints which you are 'miscontruing' from an inherently biased religiously-blind perspective.

[Flackle]

A majority of the posts from people bashing other people about their beliefs are done for the sole purpose of making people mad and causing an uproar.  That is why I strongly suggest using the IGNORE button.  These people seem to spend an inordinate amount of time looking for places they can pontificate about the agenda they are pushing.  If we truly ignore them, they will have no way to distribute their hate.  It will probably drive them crazy.  CHIRP

This is absolutely 100% wrong. The debate over religion is a very important one, and one that should be expressed more often. I am not here to purposefully make religious adherents mad. I am here to refute their opinions by expressing my own. If they can be allowed to share their ideas, then I should be allowed to share my dissenting one. What you are proposing is that people ignore that which they do not agree with, then as a result the entire idea of expanding your horizons and growing as a human being are thrown out the window.

If we where to follow your philosophy, we would all be stuck in our own little world and no problems of this world would be solved.

[remediagirl]

A majority of the posts from people bashing other people about their beliefs are done for the sole purpose of making people mad and causing an uproar.  That is why I strongly suggest using the IGNORE button.  These people seem to spend an inordinate amount of time looking for places they can pontificate about the agenda they are pushing.  If we truly ignore them, they will have no way to distribute their hate.  It will probably drive them crazy.  CHIRP

This is absolutely 100% wrong. The debate over religion is a very important one, and one that should be expressed more often. I am not here to purposefully make religious adherents mad. I am here to refute their opinions by expressing my own. If they can be allowed to share their ideas, then I should be allowed to share my dissenting one. What you are proposing is that people ignore that which they do not agree with, then as a result the entire idea of expanding your horizons and growing as a human being are thrown out the window.

If we where to follow your philosophy, we would all be stuck in our own little world and no problems of this world would be solved.

It has been my observation Flackle that you do not bash anyone,name call, misconstrue postings, or take parts of what people say out of context in order to subject them to bias hatred. You state how you feel in an honest and open way using words that do not confuse people. I respect this. We have a right to say what we feel. And believe what we want. You don't belittle people to get your point across or constantly spam them with hatred. My hat is off to you.