Kohler: Original posters' thread titles are being changed w/in threads

[jcribb16]

My religious views have nothing to do with the FACT 

Your skewed religious opinion does not constitute "fact".  Neither does you continued inability to separate such faith-based opinion from the 'fact' that thread titles were not being misconstrued and were instead, changed to reflect the context of replies.

Nothing you say changes the fact that you misconstrue things. It has nothing to do with religion. It is not faith-based...it is a fact that you misconstrue things.

[falcon9]

Nothing you say changes the fact

It remains that your biased opinion, having no factual basis, is not a "fact", no matter how many times you falsely insist that your baseless opinion is factual.

[falcon9]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.

[jcribb16]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.

Speak for yourself, troller.

[falcon9]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.
[/quote]

Speak for yourself, troller.

I did, xtian troll.  Two of your posted replies mentioning "gloating" directly indicate your true purpose.  Requoting them as evidence won't prevent your self-delusions from blinding you to evidence in your own words so, I won't bother, (they're in this thread, should others who have eyes that can see choose to see).

[jcribb16]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.

Speak for yourself, troller.

I did, xtian troll.  Two of your posted replies mentioning "gloating" directly indicate your true purpose.  Requoting them as evidence won't prevent your self-delusions from blinding you to evidence in your own words so, I won't bother, (they're in this thread, should others who have eyes that can see choose to see).[/quote]



Apparently your guilty conscience is blinding you to the truth.  I said I had a legitimate question - you refuse to believe it and that's your choice.  And it is also truth that you were "gloating" over it and you know it - why deny something that is true?    

As an afterthought, I would not like my original titles to threads I've started, changed within the threads.  Anyone who replies after someone changes it, in response to the one changing it, also has their responses with that new title.  It may be allowed, and now I know that, but it doesn't mean I personally agree - it means I will respect Kohler's decision, and I will go in wherever I can, to change any of your changes back to the original poster's title, when I happen to quote you.  You are so obvious with your facetiousness, when it comes to trying to hoodwink Christians in this forum, including toeing the boundary lines of different meanings of the "golden rule."

You just don't like it because someone questioned your "misconstruing" titles of original poster's threads - it was a legitimate question - if you don't believe me, then ask Kohler yourself.  I honestly wanted to know if that was something that was allowed, especially when the one doing it, is already intolerant towards believers, and appeared to be the only one doing it.  If I missed others doing it, that's not my fault - it's a question applicable to the whole forum of posters.  Think what you want - no worries here.  I'll just know to be on guard for when you do this, so I can change it back when I post to someone.  So, in that regards, thank you very much!

[falcon9]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.

Speak for yourself, troller.

I did, xtian troll.  Two of your posted replies mentioning "gloating" directly indicate your true purpose.  Requoting them as evidence won't prevent your self-delusions from blinding you to evidence in your own words so, I won't bother, (they're in this thread, should others who have eyes that can see choose to see).

And it is also truth that you were "gloating" over it and you know it - why deny something that is true?

Mainly because your false accusation isn't true, that's why.  Simply making an unsubstantiated accusation doesn't make it true.  Just like simply making false attributions to supernatural beings doesn't make those true either.

You are so obvious with your facetiousness, when it comes to trying to hoodwink Christians in this forum, including toeing the boundary lines of different meanings of the "golden rule."

Here's where your tacit admission of your actual agenda rears it's ugly head, (both in the statement above and the one below):

I honestly wanted to know if that was something that was allowed, especially when the one doing it, is already intolerant towards believers, and appeared to be the only one doing it. 

Taken together, both of your statements directly indicate your actual agenda was to find some way of using FC staff as a weapon against someone who opposes xtianity.  That's not only insulting to FC but, is a sign of abject weakness of fundamentalist xtianity in its failure to achieve that end.

[ancmetro]

     Thanks for all the information!

[jcribb16]

I had a legitimate question ...  

On the contrary, it was quite obvious from the content of your first post in this thread that the actual purpose was to 'tell on' another FC member in order to incite some censorous action by the moderators.  That failed, your fellow xtian blind-faithers jumped on that sinking ship and you egged them on - that's trolling.

Speak for yourself, troller.

I did, xtian troll.  Two of your posted replies mentioning "gloating" directly indicate your true purpose.  Requoting them as evidence won't prevent your self-delusions from blinding you to evidence in your own words so, I won't bother, (they're in this thread, should others who have eyes that can see choose to see).

And it is also truth that you were "gloating" over it and you know it - why deny something that is true?

Mainly because your false accusation isn't true, that's why.  Simply making an unsubstantiated accusation doesn't make it true.  Just like simply making false attributions to supernatural beings doesn't make those true either.

You are so obvious with your facetiousness, when it comes to trying to hoodwink Christians in this forum, including toeing the boundary lines of different meanings of the "golden rule."

Here's where your tacit admission of your actual agenda rears it's ugly head, (both in the statement above and the one below):

I honestly wanted to know if that was something that was allowed, especially when the one doing it, is already intolerant towards believers, and appeared to be the only one doing it. 

Taken together, both of your statements directly indicate your actual agenda was to find some way of using FC staff as a weapon against someone who opposes xtianity.  That's not only insulting to FC but, is a sign of abject weakness of fundamentalist xtianity in its failure to achieve that end.

You are really stretching, sir.  You are the one causing problems to the point that questions the fine line of the "golden rule."  I got brave enough to ask Kohler about this particular issue, because I did NOT like seeing my responses with YOUR ridiculous misconstrued changed titles from the original poster's title. 

Think what you want - I asked a LEGITIMATE question - you keep toeing the boundary lines, and yes, I, or anyone else, that thinks it is being done deliberately, will ask Kohler.  At least, he will know what you are doing.  These kinds of things you are doing are annoying and you know it - it's obvious that's why you do it.  These things eventually add up. 

Think about it, why don't you?
One person - aggravating and harassing Christians in most every thread, now changing titles within the threads (even though allowed) twisted to your advantage, name-calling even newbies who share their beliefs and trying to make them look foolish, AND MORE. 

Multiple persons - the annoyed and harassed ones trying to enjoy SOME threads with others who enjoy the same interest; having their titles changed to the opposite (within the threads/even though allowed) to twist context around to the one's agenda; reporting what they feel is harassment that disagrees with what the golden rule means; being name-called for their beliefs constantly, including being blamed for and held responsible for groups in the past that are not within our belief of our loving God, through Christ.

Summary - one person weighed against multiple persons - something is not right here when the multiple persons have to take it/try to dish it back/then accused by you of different things - when you are doing what you are accusing.  Something is fishy here.  These kinds of things have been tolerated of you, when in the past, others were given "time-outs," or banned for not near as much as you have done and continue to do even stronger. 

Please explain why it seems as if you are on the "inside" of things, and seem to project when or how someone may be given "time-out" or a ban, yet you are the provoker of some responders finally getting fed up and speaking their mind.  You get away with it way more than others who are fed up with your intolerant attitude.

When you came at the newbie like you did, telling her NO and what she is doing instead of what she should, according to your terms of no religion, and deliberately skipped over the plight of the baby going through the health issues, that showed a great many, Christian or not, just how hard your heart is.  Shame on you for that.  If it were your little girl, you would be very worried and concerned, and would hear and know of the support of other adults who would share their concern and care about her.  Christian or NO Christian. 

Do you ever take a minute to mentally place yourself in someone else's "shoes" to feel the compassion that others feel or need?  On here - you don't seem to, period.  Posters are sharing their mind and feelings - they are getting fed up with being treated by you.  Please note, I would not have responded, except that you continue to push the issue - so I responded, again, this time including my feelings on what is going on in here.

[falcon9]

One person - aggravating and harassing Christians in most every thread, now changing titles within the threads (even though allowed) twisted to your advantage, name-calling even newbies who share their beliefs and trying to make them look foolish, AND MORE. 

No, that's a false characterization, (seemingly, your favorate deception).  More than one person has objected to and opposed xtian propagandizing on the FC forums, (wherein "FC" does Not stand for "fundie xtian" forums, despite their flooding the forums with multiple xtian propagandizing threads).  Further, many of these same propagandizing xtians have started "calling-out" threads to troll one particular FC member and had them locked/removed by FC staff because that's harassment, (not the fundie-whining when their specious superstitious beliefs are challenged/refuted).

Multiple persons - the annoyed and harassed ones trying to enjoy SOME threads with others who enjoy the same interest; having their titles changed to the opposite (within the threads/even though allowed) to twist context around ...

That's another one of your false characterizations, stemming from an inherently-biased religious viewpoint.  Some thread titles have been changed to reflect changed context being replied to, (which, as you've found out, is not against FC posting policies).

Summary - one person weighed against multiple persons - something is not right here when the multiple persons have to take it/try to dish it back/then accused by ...

First, many self-deceived religious adherents do not 'out-weigh' the few who are not deluded by irrationality.  Secondly, an appeal to popular opinion is a logical fallacy.  Lastly, FC moderators decide to lock/remove calling-out threads started by xtian faux-martyrs to try silencing dissenting points of view, (which have failed each and every time - at least a half dozen times or more).

... when in the past, others were given "time-outs," or banned for ...

I've wondered why FC staff has not banned those who have violate FC posting policies multiple times.  Those include at least five separate xtian members who have each violated such FC policy on more than one occassion.  Those threads in violation do get locked or removed however, several of the violators go on to violate the same FC policy again by posting new calling-out threads, (and filing false/malicious reports to moderator).

Please explain why it seems as if you are on the "inside" of things, and seem to project when or how someone may be given "time-out" or a ban...

That's simple; I'm not an FC staff member however, I possess the ability to discern a trolling calling-out thread, as do the FC moderators.  The simpliest solution which you fundie trolls cannot seem to grasp is to cease posting calling-out threads, (something several of you are manifestly unable to do).

[remediagirl]

[hawkeye3210]

This is pretty standard on all message boards and is actually useful especially when displayed in a thread view. For instance, I changed the subject of my post to distinguish it from the other back and forth posts as my reply does not pertain to that discussion.  

[falcon9]

{describe the majority of xtians}


{depict xtian in general}


{accurately characterize the xtian belif system}

Post adjusted for accuracy so that it won't be easily "miscontrued" by faith-blinded fundies, (who will do so anyway).

[falcon9]

This is pretty standard on all message boards and is actually useful especially when displayed in a thread view. For instance, I changed the subject of my post to distinguish it from the other back and forth posts as my reply does not pertain to that discussion.  

I have participated in other forums, both moderated and unmoderated and you're exactly right, as Kohler mentioned in his reply.  It's only a few whiny xtians who were 'misconstruing' subject/content with changing thread titles in order to not let their specious nonsense go unopposed. 

[JediJohnnie]

It shouldn't be done to mock other posters,however.