Prayers please!

[lbryanwf]

Once again you completely miss the point that since you have loudly and obnoxiously broadcast your  views on prayers and rituals, you in effect interjected yourself into a post and answered arequest  that was never and would have never been asked of you. That, and the incessant name calling point to your narcissistic personality:

nar·cis·sism
   [nahr-suh-siz-em]
1.
inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity. Synonyms: self-centeredness, smugness, egocentrism.

2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.

[falcon9]

Once again you completely miss the point that since you have loudly and obnoxiously broadcast your  views on prayers and rituals, you in effect interjected yourself into a post and answered arequest  that was never and would have never been asked of you.  

Any member of FC can choose to reply to or, not reply to any post and religious zealots don't get to dictate either choice for another, much as they keep trying and failing to do.  Especially when those posts oppose 'obnoxious' religious zealotry.

[jcribb16]

There was a huge mount of jaw flapping done by Falcon simply because a person posted a request for prayer. So the question now becomes this: How has he so completely missed the point that the person did not ask for prayers from anyone who does not believe in prayer! And he has the audacity to call others ignorant?

Well said!  Yet, he has now shown his support of "rituals" as a threat towards those who are silently praying for him.  No telling what kind of "rituals" are being asked to be put on people - doesn't sound too good, with the revenge of the idea of it.  No one asked him permission to be denied permission by him, regarding prayer.  When people silently pray, they have the right to do so without "permission" from someone who doesn't even know who's praying.

[falcon9]

Yet, he has now shown his support of "rituals" as a threat towards those who are silently praying for him.  No telling what kind of "rituals" are being asked to be put on people - doesn't sound too good, with the revenge of the idea of it.  No one asked him permission to be denied permission by him, regarding prayer.  When people silently pray, they have the right to do so without "permission" from someone who doesn't even know who's praying.

The outright lies of a sanctimonious hypocritical blind fundie are revealed in the self-righteous crap asserted by you there.  Non-xtian rituals aren't inherently 'threatening' or 'revengeful', (unless xtian "prayers" are), and your direct implication that they are is both insulting and obnoxious. To return the sentiment under the auspices of the "golden rule"; there's no telling what kind of malicious xtian superstitious "prayer" rituals are being directed at others, (ineffective as these are, the intent is malicious).  Such 'pagan' rituals as may be done don't need xtian "permissions" either.

As for this bit of total idiocy, "No one asked him permission to be denied permission by him, regarding prayer"; no one asked the xtians to be logical as it's beyond their demonstrated capabilities.
 

[jcribb16]

Yet, he has now shown his support of "rituals" as a threat towards those who are silently praying for him.  No telling what kind of "rituals" are being asked to be put on people - doesn't sound too good, with the revenge of the idea of it.  No one asked him permission to be denied permission by him, regarding prayer.  When people silently pray, they have the right to do so without "permission" from someone who doesn't even know who's praying.

The outright lies of a sanctimonious hypocritical blind fundie are revealed in the self-righteous crap asserted by you there.  Non-xtian rituals aren't inherently 'threatening' or 'revengeful', (unless xtian "prayers" are), and your direct implication that they are is both insulting and obnoxious. To return the sentiment under the auspices of the "golden rule"; there's no telling what kind of malicious xtian superstitious "prayer" rituals are being directed at others, (ineffective as these are, the intent is malicious).  Such 'pagan' rituals as may be done don't need xtian "permissions" either.

As for this bit of total idiocy, "No one asked him permission to be denied permission by him, regarding prayer"; no one asked the xtians to be logical as it's beyond their demonstrated capabilities.
 

I reject your revengeful "crap" and your irrational intolerance. 

[falcon9]

I reject your revengeful "crap" and your irrational intolerance. 

That goes right along with your rejection of rational thinking and logical reasoning and is at elast consistent.

[jcribb16]

I reject your revengeful "crap" and your irrational intolerance. 

That goes right along with your rejection of rational thinking and logical reasoning and is at elast consistent.

Rejection of your hateful attitude towards believers.

[falcon9]

I reject your revengeful "crap" and your irrational intolerance. 

That goes right along with your rejection of rational thinking and logical reasoning and is at elast consistent.

Rejection of your hateful attitude towards believers.

The logical conclusion that such superstitious beliefs are irrational, (not necessarily the 'believers', since those are two separate matters), stems from the fact that such religious beliefs are based upon blind faith and lack substantive evidence to support them.  That's rational thinking, not "hate" and that conclusion relates to the superstitious "belief" rather than to any specific 'believer'.

[jcribb16]

I reject your revengeful "crap" and your irrational intolerance. 

That goes right along with your rejection of rational thinking and logical reasoning and is at elast consistent.

Rejection of your hateful attitude towards believers.

The logical conclusion that such superstitious beliefs are irrational, (not necessarily the 'believers', since those are two separate matters), stems from the fact that such religious beliefs are based upon blind faith and lack substantive evidence to support them.  That's rational thinking, not "hate" and that conclusion relates to the superstitious "belief" rather than to any specific 'believer'.

So?  What's your point?  It's not your choice to believe in God.  You don't live in their lives.  You are NOT God.  You are the least worry when someone chooses to believe in God.  You make no impression on believers, other than being hateful and intolerant.  You don't show concern for believers' welfare with what you are doing - you are being mean.  So your irrational obsessive compulsive behavior towards believers is rejected outright.  Period.

[jcribb16]

Cateyes, I hope your consultation went okay.  {{{Hugs}}} and I've been thinking of you with this today.  I may not be on as much tomorrow (Wed.) since I have to go to 2 specialist appts. out of town, and have to get my asthma infusions.  Hopefully I can check in early tomorrow evening. 

[falcon9]

Reply reiterated since you obviously aren't paying attention, (others however, are).

So your irrational obsessive compulsive behavior towards believers is rejected outright.  Period.

The logical conclusion that such superstitious beliefs are irrational, (not necessarily the 'believers', since those are two separate matters), stems from the fact that such religious beliefs are based upon blind faith and lack substantive evidence to support them.  That's rational thinking, not "hate" and that conclusion relates to the superstitious "belief" rather than to any specific 'believer'.

[jcribb16]

So your irrational obsessive compulsive behavior towards believers is rejected outright.  Period.

Rejected for the hateful attitude of the way you troll it constantly onto the believers, when it's their choice to worship who they choose.  You show no concern - only a meanness about it.  There is a difference between concern and spitefulness, you know. 

[falcon9]

... irrational obsessive compulsive behavior ...

[falcon9]

Your inane replies to unattributed posts you're trying to attribute to me is belied by the record of the actual posts just prior to your trolling and ...

... is rejected outright. 

 

[jcribb16]