Revealing When Christ Is Coming Back!

[falcon9]

its obvious you dont pay attn to bible and i see that carrys on to the FC forum.

It's more obvious that such a blind faith in that assemblage of myths, unfounded religious beliefs and tangled lies means religious zealots are paying far too much attention to it and those self-delusions carry across to the forums.

Either that or go ask your magical fairy and see if you get some help there.You brought that up so i guess you believe in that nonsense.

The OP mentioned that "Just because they believe in a magical fairy in the sky ...", ("they" being religious adherents who believe in a supernatural egregore which has no substantive evidence of existing), in reference to religious zealots - not the OP's 'beliefs'.

[heroftimes]

I still cannot understand what you are trying to get across here, perhaps your book of superstitions has severely impeded your cognitive ability to make a point.

.... I'm not too sure what you're trying to imply here, perhaps you could explain it to me in a way that's logical, unlike you're religion.

hey, stop picking on the believers in here.  Just because they believe in a magical fairy in the sky, cannot substantiate any proof he exists, and still try to argue how great he is, means they are not subject to any sort of criticism!   

Hero.....you looking for info on a wheelchair or radishes?
Hero its obvious you dont pay attn to bible and i see that carrys on to the FC forum.Either that or go ask your magical fairy and see if you get some help there.You brought that up so i guess you believe in that nonsense.

[hitch0403]

Hero...lemme agree with you from here on out so you dont have to bore me anymore!!

IOW...take a hike and go bother somebody else.

[heroftimes]

This is a public forum, I'm free to respond to any posts in here.  I'm just trying to help take the blinders off that religion has put on you.

Hero...lemme agree with you from here on out so you dont have to bore me anymore!!

IOW...take a hike and go bother somebody else.

[falcon9]

This is a public forum, I'm free to respond to any posts in here.  I'm just trying to help take the blinders off that religion has put on you.

That's true and any member who tries ordering you to "take a hike" can be disregarded or ignored because they're not able to restrict/censor/oppress/repress/oppress responses here.

Hero...lemme agree with you from here on out so you dont have to bore me anymore!!

IOW...take a hike and go bother somebody else.

[vp44]

I'm curious why is it that Christians feel more offended than most religious people. When I was growing up I went to a Baptist Church that was all white and my brothers and I was only Black kids there.  3 of us learned about the bible from a Baptist minister. We went to Sunday school and 2 times a week bible study. I learned much from this preacher who became a great family member up until he passed away and his family is still apart of our lives. One thing about our Baptist minister he never implied that all should be or should have to fight among religion.
Christians seem to push they believe upon others and also think that their religion is most holy. This is the reason why we have such a problem within our Gov.... State and Church should never go together. I think that Christians have gotten besides them self and really need to go back to putting their religion in a place where it does not affect judgement of Gov or affect PRO CHOICE. I'm tired of hearing about what Christians think all people should do. Its not your life or choice so please think about yourself and already move on and do whats best for your religion among those who believe in it. Stop trying to push your beliefs on others.

[jcribb16]

I'm curious why is it that Christians feel more offended than most religious people. When I was growing up I went to a Baptist Church that was all white and my brothers and I was only Black kids there.  3 of us learned about the bible from a Baptist minister. We went to Sunday school and 2 times a week bible study. I learned much from this preacher who became a great family member up until he passed away and his family is still apart of our lives. One thing about our Baptist minister he never implied that all should be or should have to fight among religion.
Christians seem to push they believe upon others and also think that their religion is most holy. This is the reason why we have such a problem within our Gov.... State and Church should never go together. I think that Christians have gotten besides them self and really need to go back to putting their religion in a place where it does not affect judgement of Gov or affect PRO CHOICE. I'm tired of hearing about what Christians think all people should do. Its not your life or choice so please think about yourself and already move on and do whats best for your religion among those who believe in it. Stop trying to push your beliefs on others.

I, speaking for myself, am not trying to push my belief on others.  Everyone has their own choice to make in life. 

In this forum, I am for fairness when it comes to people starting threads of interest for others who may take an interest or share in the subjects.  That includes an Off Topic Bible Verse thread, Inspiration thread (whether quotes or verses or little things that mean a lot (whether Biblical or not), and Prayer threads, etc.  They aren't necessarily debate threads, although many turn into them.  And while people can come in and oppose, it's not following the "golden rule" of this forum, for people to come after every single poster/post in those Off Topic threads, over and over, to constantly bash and cut down those who enjoy those threads.  That is my main issue. 

Those threads are allowed and in essence, those "trollers" who are always bashing, are the ones trying to "push their opposition" onto those others.  A debate/discuss thread, however, would be "enter at your own risk," this is true.  But the Off Topic ones being overly bashed is not fair to those who only want to share with any who are interested in listening and also sharing.

[ghunter]

We all will know when he returns.

[falcon9]

And while people can come in and oppose, it's not following the "golden rule" of this forum ...

There's no "golden rule" which permits unopposed viewpoints.  Anything can be challenged without having the challenges being suppressed because the one challenged believes the challenges are "rude", "disrespectful" or any other disingenuous way to repress opposition.

Those threads are allowed and in essence, those "trollers" ...

It isn't 'trolling' to post dissenting responses to threads already trolling a contentious subject.  Such religious-trolling threads are permitted as long as they aren't "calling-out" threads, (several of which, started by xtians, have been recently locked or removed).  Just as such religious trolling threads are permitted, so too are dissenting responses.

"A debate/discuss thread, however, would be "enter at your own risk," this is true.  But the Off Topic ones being overly bashed is not fair to those who only want to ..." [... propagandize religious superstitions unopposed]

The Off Topic forum is not some sort of 'safe haven' for unopposed opinionating; contentious material may be opposed there, (as in the Off Topic subforum, D&D).  These continuous attempts to suppress/restrict/oppress/constrict/censor dissenting viewpoints continue to fail and have been tedious for month now.  While there's no specific prohibition against promoting such one-sided censorship, there's also no prohibition against opposing such disgusting attempts to suppress dissent.  

[falcon9]

We all will know when he returns.

What, a week from never, (since the whole thing is a superstitious myth without substantive basis)?

[jcribb16]

And while people can come in and oppose, it's not following the "golden rule" of this forum ...

There's no "golden rule" which permits unopposed viewpoints.  Anything can be challenged without having the challenges being suppressed because the one challenged believes the challenges are "rude", "disrespectful" or any other disingenuous way to repress opposition.

Those threads are allowed and in essence, those "trollers" ...

It isn't 'trolling' to post dissenting responses to threads already trolling a contentious subject.  Such religious-trolling threads are permitted as long as they aren't "calling-out" threads, (several of which, started by xtians, have been recently locked or removed).  Just as such religious trolling threads are permitted, so too are dissenting responses.

"A debate/discuss thread, however, would be "enter at your own risk," this is true.  But the Off Topic ones being overly bashed is not fair to those who only want to ..." [... propagandize religious superstitions unopposed]

The Off Topic forum is not some sort of 'safe haven' for unopposed opinionating; contentious material may be opposed there, (as in the Off Topic subforum, D&D).  These continuous attempts to suppress/restrict/oppress/constrict/censor dissenting viewpoints continue to fail and have been tedious for month now.  While there's no specific prohibition against promoting such one-sided censorship, there's also no prohibition against opposing such disgusting attempts to suppress dissent.  

Whining again?  Not in the mood, tonight, falcon9, to deal with your drama. 

[falcon9]

And while people can come in and oppose, it's not following the "golden rule" of this forum ...

There's no "golden rule" which permits unopposed viewpoints.  Anything can be challenged without having the challenges being suppressed because the one challenged believes the challenges are "rude", "disrespectful" or any other disingenuous way to repress opposition.

Those threads are allowed and in essence, those "trollers" ...

It isn't 'trolling' to post dissenting responses to threads already trolling a contentious subject.  Such religious-trolling threads are permitted as long as they aren't "calling-out" threads, (several of which, started by xtians, have been recently locked or removed).  Just as such religious trolling threads are permitted, so too are dissenting responses.

"A debate/discuss thread, however, would be "enter at your own risk," this is true.  But the Off Topic ones being overly bashed is not fair to those who only want to ..." [... propagandize religious superstitions unopposed]

The Off Topic forum is not some sort of 'safe haven' for unopposed opinionating; contentious material may be opposed there, (as in the Off Topic subforum, D&D).  These continuous attempts to suppress/restrict/oppress/constrict/censor dissenting viewpoints continue to fail and have been tedious for month now.  While there's no specific prohibition against promoting such one-sided censorship, there's also no prohibition against opposing such disgusting attempts to suppress dissent.  

Whining again?  Not in the mood, tonight, falcon9, to deal with your drama.  

On the contrary, the post opposes your "whining" attempts to suppress opposition.  Deal with your own hypocritical melodrama.

[jcribb16]

And while people can come in and oppose, it's not following the "golden rule" of this forum ...

There's no "golden rule" which permits unopposed viewpoints.  Anything can be challenged without having the challenges being suppressed because the one challenged believes the challenges are "rude", "disrespectful" or any other disingenuous way to repress opposition.

Those threads are allowed and in essence, those "trollers" ...

It isn't 'trolling' to post dissenting responses to threads already trolling a contentious subject.  Such religious-trolling threads are permitted as long as they aren't "calling-out" threads, (several of which, started by xtians, have been recently locked or removed).  Just as such religious trolling threads are permitted, so too are dissenting responses.

"A debate/discuss thread, however, would be "enter at your own risk," this is true.  But the Off Topic ones being overly bashed is not fair to those who only want to ..." [... propagandize religious superstitions unopposed]

The Off Topic forum is not some sort of 'safe haven' for unopposed opinionating; contentious material may be opposed there, (as in the Off Topic subforum, D&D).  These continuous attempts to suppress/restrict/oppress/constrict/censor dissenting viewpoints continue to fail and have been tedious for month now.  While there's no specific prohibition against promoting such one-sided censorship, there's also no prohibition against opposing such disgusting attempts to suppress dissent.  

Whining again?  Not in the mood, tonight, falcon9, to deal with your drama.  

On the contrary, the post opposes your "whining" attempts to suppress opposition.  Deal with your own hypocritical melodrama.

Ha ha - always a 'same-for-same' comeback!  Perhaps we can go for "tied" tonight, lol?  This reminds me of many lawyers, politicians, presidents, etc.  In public, many of course, disagree to the point of it seeming like hate between them (like in the courtroom, debates, etc.)  Then outside of all of that, it's like what happened to the hate?  They laugh, discuss other things, joke, etc., with each other.  Anyway, hope you are enjoying your weekend and that you are not in the path of Sandy.

[falcon9]

Ha ha - always a 'same-for-same' comeback!  Perhaps we can go for "tied" tonight, lol?  This reminds me of many lawyers, politicians, presidents, etc.  In public, many of course, disagree to the point of it seeming like hate between them (like in the courtroom, debates, etc.)  Then outside of all of that, it's like what happened to the hate?  They laugh, discuss other things, joke, etc., with each other.  Anyway, hope you are enjoying your weekend and that you are not in the path of Sandy.

The last time I was in the path of "Sandy" was while taking a college course in California.  Fortunately, I was able to escape a large portion of her path of destruction.  Sandy was a blond-haired, blue-eyed different sort of 'storm'.

[jcribb16]

Ha ha - always a 'same-for-same' comeback!  Perhaps we can go for "tied" tonight, lol?  This reminds me of many lawyers, politicians, presidents, etc.  In public, many of course, disagree to the point of it seeming like hate between them (like in the courtroom, debates, etc.)  Then outside of all of that, it's like what happened to the hate?  They laugh, discuss other things, joke, etc., with each other.  Anyway, hope you are enjoying your weekend and that you are not in the path of Sandy.

The last time I was in the path of "Sandy" was while taking a college course in California.  Fortunately, I was able to escape a large portion of her path of destruction.  Sandy was a blond-haired, blue-eyed different sort of 'storm'.

Lol!  Fair enough!