Revealing When Christ Is Coming Back!

[falcon9]

Just to verify, provide additional evidence of textual Tourettes.

Checkmate!!

Thanks for your cooperation.

[jcribb16]

No one is required to be tolerant or polite nonbelivers either, but we are. thats the difference.

You're missing the point, as usual.  The difference is that there's no requirement to 'respect' specious superstitious beliefs.  Non-believers don't have such specious superstitious beliefs.  The FC guideline is to respect other members of FC, not their beliefs, (a person is not their beliefs).  Perhaps this distinction is too subtle for some religious zealots; hence their confusion.

You are wrong and intolerant, especially when you call posters names - that is personal and daring the boundary line of the golden rule. 

What "names"?  The terms employed are factually-accurate and just because you don't like them, they don't constitute 'name-calling' under the correct definition of that phrase.  Falsely characterizing factual descriptive terms in that manner is lying.

What you are really doing is trying to shut Christian's opinions up and make them look bad. 

False.  What I've been doing for some time now is opposing the same religious belief system directly responsible for some of the most reprehensible atrocities in history.  Such opposition isn't intended to "shut xtians up" since they continue to be able to post about their superstitions and make themselves "look bad."

Another thing is that it is very obvious you are enjoying what you are doing, which constitutes "trolling" ...

False.  Responding to/opposing INITIALLY-posted religious trolling doesn't constitute "trolling", it constitutes a response to trolling.  Whether or not FC moderators, (not you or I), would consider reasoned opposition to be 'counter-trolling' isn't up to you.

Lame excuse - they are allowed in the forum and are not deliberately "initially posted" and they are NOT religious "trolling."  They ARE ALLOWED in this forum.  You really need to get a grip. 

[jcribb16]

Checkmate!!

[falcon9]

they are allowed in the forum and are not deliberately "initially posted"

Whether allowed or not doesn't change the fact that they constitute 'religious trolling' in that they promote contentious religious beliefs.

and they are NOT religious "trolling."  They ARE ALLOWED in this forum.  

See above.

[jcribb16]

they are allowed in the forum and are not deliberately "initially posted"

Whether allowed or not doesn't change the fact that they constitute 'religious trolling' in that they promote contentious religious beliefs.

and they are NOT religious "trolling."  They ARE ALLOWED in this forum.  

See above.

It's obvious you have difficulty with the concept that when something is allowed to be posted in a forum, it is not "religious trolling" just because you say so.  If it is "religious trolling," for real, then the moderator would ban them, block them, or reprimand the original posters for "trolling."  But, that's okay - we understand that you are struggling with this concept and will take that into consideration.

Of course, if you keep insisting something that isn't true, then it's only fair to call your intolerance of Christians' opinions, WHICH ARE ALLOWED, as "Trolling/Atheist Bashing Christians."  However, since you are apparently not reprimanded for your "trolling" as we see it and experience it, then you must accept the fact that we aren't "trolling" you like you enjoy pretending we are.  Easy solution - stay out of the threads that irritate you.  But, I know, I know, you enjoy what you are doing way too much to back off, and that's a real shame and shows what your moral character is towards Christians, period.

[falcon9]

It's obvious you have difficulty with the concept that when something is allowed to be posted in a forum, it is not "religious trolling" just because you say so.  If it is "religious trolling," for real, then the moderator would ban them, block them, or reprimand the original posters for "trolling."

I've already stated that such religious trolling is permitted because it doesn't overtly violate FC posting policies.  It's unfortunate that you're unable to comprehend the difference such trolling be allowed and "calling-out" threads, (which are not permitted by FC).  Just because religious trolling is permitted doesn't mean it isn't religious trolling.

But, that's okay - we understand that you are struggling with this concept and will take that into consideration.

As previously iterated, your attempts at being condescending fail due to your irrational position not being superior in any way to the actual situation, (despite your ego-defensive huffiness).

Of course, if you keep insisting something that isn't true ...

No, that would be you; as numerous posts of yours are in archived evidence substantiate.

Easy solution - stay out of the threads that irritate you.  

There you go again; trying to restrict/censor/oppress/suppress dissenting points of view.  It hasn't worked for the last several dozen times you've tried it, why do you persist with tilting forlornly at that windmill?

[jcribb16]

It's obvious you have difficulty with the concept that when something is allowed to be posted in a forum, it is not "religious trolling" just because you say so.  If it is "religious trolling," for real, then the moderator would ban them, block them, or reprimand the original posters for "trolling."

I've already stated that such religious trolling is permitted because it doesn't overtly violate FC posting policies.  It's unfortunate that you're unable to comprehend the difference such trolling be allowed and "calling-out" threads, (which are not permitted by FC).  Just because religious trolling is permitted doesn't mean it isn't religious trolling.

But, that's okay - we understand that you are struggling with this concept and will take that into consideration.

As previously iterated, your attempts at being condescending fail due to your irrational position not being superior in any way to the actual situation, (despite your ego-defensive huffiness).

Of course, if you keep insisting something that isn't true ...

No, that would be you; as numerous posts of yours are in archived evidence substantiate.

Easy solution - stay out of the threads that irritate you.  

There you go again; trying to restrict/censor/oppress/suppress dissenting points of view.  It hasn't worked for the last several dozen times you've tried it, why do you persist with tilting forlornly at that windmill?

Tsk, tsk, falcon9.  I have already agreed with you about the "calling-out" posts being wrong and not permitted.  I don't do that, personally, and won't.  Those posts are not the same as what you are doing within religious posts that ARE ALLOWED in the forum.  Especially when one is Off Topic and you come in trolling hate towards Christians because they are daring to share verses, quotes, and inspiration with each other and with those who may be interested.  Instead of sharing your opposing opinion, you continue to respond/bash after everyone, over and over, because you hate it.  You are trolling, pure and simple.

I'm not restricting you  --  I'm telling it like it is - don't go in them if they are that bad for you.  You suggest the Ignore Button - that's the same type of thing.  Your whining is getting tediously weary...

[falcon9]

Those posts are not the same as what you are doing within religious posts that ARE ALLOWED in the forum.  Especially when one is Off Topic and you come in trolling ... Instead of sharing your opposing opinion, you continue to respond/bash after everyone ...

Posting opposing rational viewpoints in response to religious propandizing/trolling posts is not trolling or bashing, except in the inherently irrational opinion of someone holding teh religious superstition being opposed.  Your vested interest invalidates your biased opinion in that regard.

I'm not restricting you  --  I'm telling it like it is - don't go in them if they are that bad for you. 

Correct; you're not restricting opposing viewpoints - you've attempted to do so on dozens of occasions and failed.  You're continuing to attempt to do so and still failing.

[jcalexis]

According to the bible, noone knows when Jesus Christ is coming back. Only God knows.

[falcon9]

According to the bible ...

That 'source' consists of faith-based hearsay and as such, does not consist of a valid evidentiary basis.

... noone knows when Jesus Christ is coming back. Only God knows.

Such a 'religious conclusion' stems from an invalid superstitious basis and is moot due to the lack of evidence to support either the contention that a 'zombie' will return or, that such a hypothesized supernatural entity as 'g-d' exists.  Since the premise is unsubstantiated, so too are any specious conclusions derived from it.

[jcribb16]

Those posts are not the same as what you are doing within religious posts that ARE ALLOWED in the forum.  Especially when one is Off Topic and you come in trolling ... Instead of sharing your opposing opinion, you continue to respond/bash after everyone ...

Posting opposing rational viewpoints in response to religious propandizing/trolling posts is not trolling or bashing, except in the inherently irrational opinion of someone holding teh religious superstition being opposed.  Your vested interest invalidates your biased opinion in that regard.

I'm not restricting you  --  I'm telling it like it is - don't go in them if they are that bad for you. 

Correct; you're not restricting opposing viewpoints - you've attempted to do so on dozens of occasions and failed.  You're continuing to attempt to do so and still failing.

They are initially trolling, since they are allowed.  Kohler would ban them if they were considered trolling.  FAIL again with trying to restrict people from sharing their beliefs, inspiration, and prayers with others who share the same views.  We keep sharing and you keep whining and bellyaching...

[falcon9]

Those posts are not the same as what you are doing within religious posts that ARE ALLOWED in the forum.  Especially when one is Off Topic and you come in trolling ... Instead of sharing your opposing opinion, you continue to respond/bash after everyone ...

Posting opposing rational viewpoints in response to religious propandizing/trolling posts is not trolling or bashing, except in the inherently irrational opinion of someone holding teh religious superstition being opposed.  Your vested interest invalidates your biased opinion in that regard.

I'm not restricting you  --  I'm telling it like it is - don't go in them if they are that bad for you. 

Correct; you're not restricting opposing viewpoints - you've attempted to do so on dozens of occasions and failed.  You're continuing to attempt to do so and still failing.

They are initially trolling, since they are allowed. 

I'm aware of what I've previously stated but, thanks for concurring.
 

Kohler would ban them if they were considered trolling. 

No, FC moderators can lock or remove "calling-out" threads, or those which contain inaccurate information, (as FC policies state).  No FC policy states they "ban" trolling.

FAIL again with trying to restrict people from sharing their beliefs ...

Since the previous reiterations to the contrary have apparently 'failed' to penetrate the 'black body' of religious blind faith; I'm not the one repeatedly trying, (and failing), to restrict/censor/oppress/repress/suppress dissenting viewpoints - you are and there's abundant posted evidence to support that contention.  Whereas I've stated numerous times that you religious zealots have the same option to post/not post about your religious superstitious beliefs as others have to post/not post in opposition to them.  My position supports both ends of teh spectrum and points between while yours would have unopposed religious propagandizing as a result of suppressing dissenting viewpoints.  That's the significant difference between your, (suppressive of non-xtian viewpoints), position and mine, (same options for any FC member).

[hitch0403]

According to the bible, noone knows when Jesus Christ is coming back. Only God knows.

Jcal....Jesus noted in Mathew sure signs that would happen within a generation when the Kingdom of God would be set up and Satan and his hordes would be put out of heaven and confined to the earth.Total war,increase of lawlessness,earthquakes,pestilences,love of greater number cooling off.false religeons & a worldwide preaching work being done.

1914 it started...WWI began then

[falcon9]

Jesus noted in Mathew sure signs that would happen within a generation when the Kingdom of God would be set up and Satan and his hordes would be put out of heaven and confined to the earth.Total war,increase of lawlessness,earthquakes,pestilences,love of greater number cooling off.false religeons & a worldwide preaching work being done.

1914 it started...WWI began then

It's now 2012 and 98 years is enough for two or more generations worth of time to have elapsed.  Such non-"prophesies" are shown to be false and merely religious superstitions intended to engender fear and gaining adherents.  Doubtless this refutation will be met by some specious apologetics, silence or irrational smoke screen.  Regardless, if the premise is that "it" started in 1914, it would've happened by now, (more than one generation later).  The "bible" therefore contains numerous lies deemed loosely as "prophesies".

[hitch0403]

All those have happened and Jesus said some of that generation would see the end.

According to you no one alive is in their 100s today?

Its really no use to discuss this with you.You make up your own rules no matter so give your retort and move on elsewheres.