I have the right to post want I want. Just as any of you do.
Actually, you do not have any such "right" on FC as FC's Terms of Service and posting policies apply to their forums. Posting here is not a "right", it's a priviledge.
Responses are welcomed.
Apparently not, as you go on to indicate that those responses which dispute and refute yours are 'unwelcome'.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. All I'm stating is that I am a firm believer in God. I am often attacked by many atheist, and pagans.
Challenges to specious religious claims, (those declarations of 'belief' without supporting evidence), are being inaccurately described as 'attacks', (when they are merely unanswered challenges to blind faith).
If you choose not to believe that is your choice. I choose not to argue with people about it, because only fools argue.
On the contrary, only "fools" make empty religious declarations of blind faith by refusing to support them with evidence or rational reasoning. That's what makes their faith blind and the faith-blinded, self-deluded.
What is the purpose of attacking me each and every time that I post something about God. Opposing me is not going to change my mind.
The purpose of opposing blind faith is to oppose the perpetuation of unsubstantiated superstious myths. In doing so, one supports awareness and not faith-blindness. Those who remain self-blinded by faith, (declare that reason is "not going to change" their minds), are lost to self-delusion.
Just because you don't believe in GOD doesn't mean that he does not exist.
That is not logical reasoning; neither 'belief' nor disbelief have any bearing upon the factual existence, (or non-existence), of something. Something either exists or, it does not. Religious adherents have consistantly failed to produce valid evidence of the existence of a supernatural entity vaguely designated a "g-d". A belief does not confer existence therefore, their religious claims are specious and without merit.
If there is no scientific proof then people have a hard time believing in something that they can't see. It is in our nature to not believe in the supernatural. Yet we believe in everything that we see on T.V.
No, "we" do
not "believe in everything that we see on T.V.", (you may however, you aren't "we").
Some of us doubt that the Bible contains any truth.
“They say Jerusalem is proof Jesus walked on earth. I say the Empire building is proof King Kong scaled it."
-– Ben Rodriguez
Yet most believe every article that they read in a magazine. It appears that we live in a world that believes in everything except God.
Again, "most" do
not "believe every article that they read in a magazine". Your non-reasoning is faulty to the point of dishonesty and definitely does Not support your contentions. That's the central problem with irrationality; illogic does not support the rational and logical does not support irrationality. This reasoning seems to elude blind faithers.
I choose to be one of the few that is willing to stand up for what I believe in.
On the contrary, there are millions just as faith-blinded who "stand up" to declare their irrational blind faith as if they were proud of their self-delusions.
Each and every living thing on this earth has a creator.
Yes, they have a
mundane reproductive source, not a supernatural one.
There hasn't been a person that has been able to prove to me that the world was formed without a creator, or that humans were formed without a creator.
Conversely, (and instead of trying to 'prove a negative assertion'), there hasn't been a single faith-blinded religious adherent who has been able to prove the existence of a supernatural "creator" without resorting to unsupported attributions, (which fail to support their claims).
Each and every one of us has a unique design. There are no two people in the world with the same fingerprints.
I take it you are unfamiliar with DNA in general and genetics in particular.
Everything in the world has a purpose. There isn't a purposeless creature on this earth.
Take care not to confuse
function with a religious "purpose".
It is evident that we were created, unless you believe that story about us actually evolving from animals.
No, it is
not "evident" merely because you declare that it is; you've neglected to provide valid
evidence to justify the contention. Vague and unsupported attributions do not constitute valid evidence in support of your claims. They constitute faith-based empty declarations, (because faith is belief without evidence). Evolution is a theory which proposes to account for processes which took, (and are taking), place over long stretches of time. Your non-theory of 'creationism' posits a supernatural entity performing instantaneous 'magic' instead. The more plausible explanation eschews such religious magic.
"Creationists make it sound like a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night."
-- Isaac Asimov
I choose to believe in a God that can't be seen.
Then there's no qualitive difference between belief in an "invisible pink unicorn" and whatever vague g-d concept you cannot see either. The point is that those making extraordinary claims, (such as for unseen g-ds), take on the obligation of the burden of proof. Of course, religious fanatics can, (and do), often shirk this responsibility and even try shifting it onto those challenging their specious claims, (by demanding that the challenger prove something 'isn't so' - which is an illogical and dishonest dodge).
... one things for sure no fancy words, or philosophies could ever change my relationship with God.
Your declaration of being permenently blinded by empty faith is acknowledged as your self-limitation and delusion. It's unforunate however, others retain the ability to oppose and reject such religious superstitions.
Community Forum
Topic: I believe in God (Read 1939 times)