bible

[JediJohnnie]

I guess I just don't get how Falcon continues to harass people from thread to thread and still get away with it.I mean,the huge amount of complaints about his actions by many,many posters speaks for itself.

If I were to continually follow people who talk about something-anything-let's say cottage cheese for example- and I disrupted each and every conversation about the subject by using veiled and not-so veiled insults about people who like the subject-would that not be considered harrassment?

Isn't that the reason a D&D area was made in the first place?So people who don't want to debate endlessly can have a place to talk freely?I guess the whole board is out of step with Falcon and not the other way around.....

What bizarre behavior to just start posting in a thread (where you're supposed to post your favorite Bible story) when falcon9 has obviously been participating, only to start whining AGAIN about how "he has been harrassing people"?  No favorite Bible story?  Just a gripe here about how he has been harrassing others...when you followed him to a thread where he has been particpating?  Seriously!! 

It's downright laughable that you want to call me out for not adhering strictly to the topic when your new buddy,Falcon has not added a "favorite Bible story" in this thread,nor has he posted a Favorite Bible Verse in the verse thread,but continues to contaminate every single thread intended for Biblical discussion with his rantings.

If he wants to debate,the D&D is the place to go,not harassing people every single time in every single thread the Bible is brought up.For crying out loud,is this really so hard to understand?!? 

[SherylsShado]

It's downright laughable that you want to call me out for not adhering strictly to the topic when your new buddy,Falcon has not added a "favorite Bible story" in this thread,nor has he posted a Favorite Bible Verse in the verse thread,but continues to contaminate every single thread intended for Biblical discussion with his rantings.

If he wants to debate,the D&D is the place to go,not harassing people every single time in every single thread the Bible is brought up.For crying out loud,is this really so hard to understand?!? 

Did you miss his quote on page one? 

This thread occurs in the off topic forum and I made an on topic reply which indirectly implied that I don't have one, (zero out of zero would be ... zero).

  He doesn't have one and he stated that he doesn't have one.  You still haven't stated what you are doing in this thread other than to harass falcon and now myself because I don't have a problem with him.  FC isn't a "christian-only" forum, is THAT so hard for you to understand?  Falcon has the right to post wherever, to whoever he wishes just as you do...got THAT yet?  Harassment isn't falcon responding to posts, his archived posts prove he isn't the one starting trouble---he posts in EVERY category.  Harassment is you and a FEW others that have made a new hobby out of following him around on the forums and then acting like babies when he gives back a dose of your own medicine because you like the attention, like having an audience...it's OBVIOUS you only started posting here to cause trouble!  I am SICK of the drama coming from the same few on here that happen to call themselves christian, apparently that term flies loosely these days.  Reading through this thread this evening, I would have expected to see this behavior in a children's forum, not in an adult's.  GROW UP!

[johnvon23]

I would say the Genesis..... Adam and Eve

[jcribb16]

I don't know if exciting is the only word, but de-railing is a good one, too.

  Would  "de-railing" apply to JUST falcon if one comes to this thread (about posting a favorite Bible story), and instead posts a remark about falcon, which begins the de-railment of this thread? 

Considering he was speaking, in this thread (off topic, I might add) of what had happened in that other thread, with you about it, and considering he followed me to a couple of threads and reposted the scolding to me when there was no need, it sounds like it's okay for him to do that and try to rekindle that issue to seem to get me in more trouble, like he's the one who can "re-scold" me using K's words, then yes - I am upset with what he is doing, including following me into other threads.  It's not right.

[jcribb16]

I don't know if exciting is the only word, but de-railing is a good one, too.

 Would  "de-railing" apply to JUST falcon if one comes to this thread (about posting a favorite Bible story), and instead posts a remark about falcon, which begins the de-railment of this thread?  

And all of this is not on topic either.  He gets to dredge it up in another thread here, and I'm apparently not to defend or say anything because it's de-railing?  He needs to drop it as well.  I had dropped it and moved on.  He's the one following me and sharing this little episode, still calling names in the episode, and c/p-ing the scold from someone else to me over and over.  That is not right, Sheryl:
===================================================================================
SherylsShado
Gold Member
********   
Re: bible
« Reply #12 on: May 23, 2012, 06:50:53 pm » Message ID: 542061
   
Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: falcon9 on May 23, 2012, 06:44:37 pm

Quote from: SherylsShado on May 23, 2012, 06:40:08 pm
Well then, what is your favorite story in the Bible falcon because I know you wouldn't be just "spamming"/"trolling"...   dontknow


This thread occurs in the off topic forum and I made an on topic reply which indirectly implied that I don't have one, (zero out of zero would be ... zero).


Quote from: SherylsShado on May 23, 2012, 06:40:08 pm
(?)-I thought you were going to be busy working on your new thread topic "One hundred fun things to do while sitting a 'time out' in the corner"... Grin

Since I'm not in a "time out corner", I have available time to post, (as the moderator indicated, another occurance by all participants involved in the ruckus you allude to would serve virtual time).  Facts can be your friends or, inconvienent evidence.

 Grin
I "had" to pick on you a little...I couldn't believe that your *crickets chirping* post launched a post with about 450 *chirps* which led to a "chase" through other threads, and a warning from Kohler.  You definitely know how to keep things exciting around here!! Shocked
   


falcon9
Platinum Member
*********
Posts: 4026
Joined In: 2010
   
Re: bible
« Reply #13 on: May 23, 2012, 06:55:01 pm » Message ID: 542063
   
Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: SherylsShado on May 23, 2012, 06:50:53 pm
I "had" to pick on you a little...I couldn't believe that your *crickets chirping* post launched a post with about 450 *chirps* which led to a "chase" through other threads, and a warning from Kohler.  You definitely know how to keep things exciting around here!! Shocked


It was the 420 "chirps" trolling post which initiated the "chase", (close enough though).  Turns out that trolls don't like being 'fed' that which they cannot digest, (which apparently causes them to whine, and that in turn constituted said 'ruckus').  Kohler's warning did apply to all involved however, and this reply was not intended to rekindle an old 'flame'.  Shocked   Lips Sealed



SherylsShado
Gold Member
********
Posts: 2079
Joined In: 2007

   
   
Re: bible
« Reply #14 on: May 23, 2012, 06:58:33 pm » Message ID: 542066
   
Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: falcon9 on May 23, 2012, 06:55:01 pm
Quote from: SherylsShado on May 23, 2012, 06:50:53 pm
I "had" to pick on you a little...I couldn't believe that your *crickets chirping* post launched a post with about 450 *chirps* which led to a "chase" through other threads, and a warning from Kohler.  You definitely know how to keep things exciting around here!! Shocked

It was the 420 "chirps" trolling post which initiated the "chase", (close enough though).  Turns out that trolls don't like being 'fed' that which they cannot digest, (which apparently causes them to whine, and that in turn constituted said 'ruckus').  Kohler's warning did apply to all involved however, and this reply was not intended to rekindle an old 'flame'.  Shocked   Lips Sealed

thumbsup

[SherylsShado]

Considering he was speaking, in this thread (off topic, I might add) of what had happened in that other thread, with you about it, and considering he followed me to a couple of threads and reposted the scolding to me when there was no need, it sounds like it's okay for him to do that and try to rekindle that issue to seem to get me in more trouble, like he's the one who can "re-scold" me using K's words, then yes - I am upset with what he is doing, including following me into other threads.  It's not right.

He wasn't the one that firstly started speaking of what happened in the other thread--I did.  He wasn't trying to rekindle anything in this thread, he was simply responding in discussion to me.  I don't think an apology is warranted from me for "teasing" him about it since others freely discuss whatever they wish with others in the forums.  He wasn't "off topic" in this thread, his thoughts are just as valid as anyone else's on this forum.  No one can get you in more trouble but yourself, as only you are responsible for your actions.  I don't think he "follows" anyone around in the other threads, as he seems to be in ALL the other threads.  He wasn't the one that followed you here, you followed him. 

[jcribb16]

Considering he was speaking, in this thread (off topic, I might add) of what had happened in that other thread, with you about it, and considering he followed me to a couple of threads and reposted the scolding to me when there was no need, it sounds like it's okay for him to do that and try to rekindle that issue to seem to get me in more trouble, like he's the one who can "re-scold" me using K's words, then yes - I am upset with what he is doing, including following me into other threads.  It's not right.

He wasn't the one that firstly started speaking of what happened in the other thread--I did.  He wasn't trying to rekindle anything in this thread, he was simply responding in discussion to me.  I don't think an apology is warranted from me for "teasing" him about it since others freely discuss whatever they wish with others in the forums.  He wasn't "off topic" in this thread, his thoughts are just as valid as anyone else's on this forum.  No one can get you in more trouble but yourself, as only you are responsible for your actions.  I don't think he "follows" anyone around in the other threads, as he seems to be in ALL the other threads.  He wasn't the one that followed you here, you followed him. 

Whatever you want to think is fine.  I'm not going to argue.  He went into the thread he followed the chirper poster in, after the scolding, just to c/p the scolding to me, when I commented by to the chirper poster that it was not her fault he came into the blog thread to get back at her and de-rail the blog thread.  He followed me into another thread later and cut down a comment I said to someone who asked for prayer, and then again, later, c/p the scolding to me.  But, if that's okay in your eyes, fine.  He's accomplished what he wanted.  And I'm sure he's gloating over you taking up for him.  It's not worth it to continue arguing with someone who I thought was a friend and would look fairly at both sides.  Have a nice night, Sheryl.

[SherylsShado]

Whatever you want to think is fine.  I'm not going to argue.  He went into the thread he followed the chirper poster in, after the scolding, just to c/p the scolding to me, when I commented by to the chirper poster that it was not her fault he came into the blog thread to get back at her and de-rail the blog thread.  He followed me into another thread later and cut down a comment I said to someone who asked for prayer, and then again, later, c/p the scolding to me.  But, if that's okay in your eyes, fine.  He's accomplished what he wanted.  And I'm sure he's gloating over you taking up for him.  It's not worth it to continue arguing with someone who I thought was a friend and would look fairly at both sides.  Have a nice night, Sheryl.

O-kay, thanx for the 'guilt-trip'.  If he's that BIG of a problem, why is it so DIFFICULT to put him on "ignore"?   

[jcribb16]

Whatever you want to think is fine.  I'm not going to argue.  He went into the thread he followed the chirper poster in, after the scolding, just to c/p the scolding to me, when I commented by to the chirper poster that it was not her fault he came into the blog thread to get back at her and de-rail the blog thread.  He followed me into another thread later and cut down a comment I said to someone who asked for prayer, and then again, later, c/p the scolding to me.  But, if that's okay in your eyes, fine.  He's accomplished what he wanted.  And I'm sure he's gloating over you taking up for him.  It's not worth it to continue arguing with someone who I thought was a friend and would look fairly at both sides.  Have a nice night, Sheryl.

O-kay, thanx for the 'guilt-trip'.  If he's that BIG of a problem, why is it so DIFFICULT to put him on "ignore"?   

I wasn't trying to put you on a guilt trip, Sheryl.  He seems to be able to get away with more than anyone I've ever seen since I joined.  And the only thing said is "put him on ignore."  When there are so many who are complaining about one person in particular, then that should say something about where a group/forum is heading.  It's getting to where it's not fun to debate like we all used to.
 
You got on to two of us for saying anything to him, yet you brought up, off topic, the episode that has caused a problem, joking with him about it.  And he continued to talk about it like he's done nothing.  3 people, so far, including the original poster of that blog, plus who knows how many now, have left that blog thread because of what happened.  That's not funny at all.

I really don't want something like this to mess what friendship we have had on here.  That's why I really don't want to argue about it.  But I felt I had to defend myself in this with you getting on to me, yet it seems it's fine for him to carry on about it.  That's my main point.

[SherylsShado]

Whether "he gets away with more than anyone" is a matter of opinion.  Clearly,  he hasn't done anything against FC rules/policies or he wouldn't be here.  FC has provided an "ignore" button, if people refuse to use it it's no one's problem but their own.  
  
  I teased him about it because I was surprised he would chase down someone for a "multiple chirp post" after so patiently tolerating all the "call-out"/"beat-down" posts on him.  My post to him isn't against any FC rules/policies.  If people don't wish others to think they are hilarious in the forums then maybe they should act like they have some sense.

  I had saw what that member did in her "multiple chirp" post and thinking she was so funny "mocking" him.  I guess we should all turn our heads and act like THAT didn't happen?   She didn't like reaping what her actions sowed and I'm the one that is supposed to be sorry?  She started it, she got a taste of her own medicine and didn't like it.  Hopefully she's learned a lesson  about spamming in forums.  Falcon's reply to me on pg.1, he stated "this reply was not intended to rekindle an old 'flame'" which meant that even though I brought it up and he offered an explanation of the situation, he wasn't trying to "stir it up again".  So what's the point of following him in here, 'rekindling the flames' unless it was to 'keep the fire burning'?  

   To say "yet it seems it's fine for him to carry on about it"---he wasn't carrying on about it.  I teased him, he stated what his intentions for his reply was and we were done with it.  You and jj followed him in here and pratically turned this thread into another "beat down" on falcon thread.  And you expect me to back you on that?  I can't.  He had good reason to 'go after' "chirpy" and while the outcome was an unfortunate one, a person has to think before they act or the consequences of their actions may affect the innocent.

Now...BACK to favorite Bible stories....

[falcon9]

Off-Topic forum/Re: bible:
« Reply #15 on: 23-05-2012, 21:44:37 » Message ID: 542120

I don't know if exciting is the only word, but de-railing is a good one, too.

  Would "de-railing" apply to JUST falcon if one comes to this thread (about posting a favorite Bible story), and instead posts a remark about falcon, which begins the de-railment of this thread? 

Any "de-railing" aside for the moment, posting remarks about someone who could easily be placed on 'ignore' with the touch of a button sounds like trolling them instead.  While that probably constitutes a derailment, (or, at the very least 'subject-drift'), there would have been nothing
for me to reply to had not someone posted a derailing/subject-drifting remark first.  Given the archived sequence of events, I'm not sure why someone would try to misrepresent them instead, (although I could speculate as to why, I'll decline that option for now).

[falcon9]

He seems to be able to get away with more than anyone I've ever seen since I joined.  And the only thing said is "put him on ignore."  When there are so many who are complaining about one person in particular, then that should say something about where a group/forum is heading. 

As "Sheryls" aptly pointed out; this is an FC forum, not some sort of exclusive xtian-only venue, (even with the enormous number of religiously-based remarks and threads on the non-partisan FC forums).  While it's unfortunate that dissenting viewpoints and challenges to unfounded declarations are sometimes misinterpreted as "harrassing" responses, it is fortunate to live in a country, (the U.S. - Canadian mileage may vary), where opposing points of view can still be expressed without suppression.

That's why I really don't want to argue about it.  But I felt I had to defend myself in this with you getting on to me, yet it seems it's fine for him to carry on about it. 

[jcribb16]

Whether "he gets away with more than anyone" is a matter of opinion.  Clearly,  he hasn't done anything against FC rules/policies or he wouldn't be here.  FC has provided an "ignore" button, if people refuse to use it it's no one's problem but their own.  
  
  I teased him about it because I was surprised he would chase down someone for a "multiple chirp post" after so patiently tolerating all the "call-out"/"beat-down" posts on him.  My post to him isn't against any FC rules/policies.  If people don't wish others to think they are hilarious in the forums then maybe they should act like they have some sense.

  I had saw what that member did in her "multiple chirp" post and thinking she was so funny "mocking" him.  I guess we should all turn our heads and act like THAT didn't happen?   She didn't like reaping what her actions sowed and I'm the one that is supposed to be sorry?  She started it, she got a taste of her own medicine and didn't like it.  Hopefully she's learned a lesson  about spamming in forums.  Falcon's reply to me on pg.1, he stated "this reply was not intended to rekindle an old 'flame'" which meant that even though I brought it up and he offered an explanation of the situation, he wasn't trying to "stir it up again".  So what's the point of following him in here, 'rekindling the flames' unless it was to 'keep the fire burning'?  

   To say "yet it seems it's fine for him to carry on about it"---he wasn't carrying on about it.  I teased him, he stated what his intentions for his reply was and we were done with it.  You and jj followed him in here and pratically turned this thread into another "beat down" on falcon thread.  And you expect me to back you on that?  I can't.  He had good reason to 'go after' "chirpy" and while the outcome was an unfortunate one, a person has to think before they act or the consequences of their actions may affect the innocent.

Now...BACK to favorite Bible stories....

I don't agree with what she did at all. But he came after her to give her a "dose" of her own medicine, and in doing so, caused a thread to derail.  So to you, that was okay?  The consequences of his actions, too, affected the innocent in that thread.  Yet, dare I come into a thread and say anything?  Especially when he went BACK in there "re-scolding" me like I'm a kid, and when the scolding applied to him, too?  What happened to your extreme fairness of looking at both sides?   

[healthfreedom]

Oh wow!!! I have so many that I just love to read and hear over and over again. Well, lket's see: Moses delivering the Israelites from Egypt; Korah and his rebellious followers being swallowed uo alive into the earth; when Jesus forgave the adulterous woman; the 3 Hebrew young men in the fiery furnace; and so many others.

[jcribb16]

My favorite story after the birth of Jesus, is Ruth.  I also really like Esther.  Both of these strong women stood strong for God, no matter what the strife or circumstances.