And as far as providing evidence as I've told you before you coincidently forget... Christianity is based on faith therefore weirder stand ...
I've known for some time before you mentioned any non-coincidences that xtianity is based speciously upon blind-faith, ("faith" being that for which there is no extant supporting evidence).
... and never have claimed to be able to provide proof God is real...
As previous remarks, (not just mine), have indicated; such claims as 'believing' in something for which there is no extant evidence is an indication of blind-faith. If the claimaint is maintaining a belief in that which has no evidence of being "real"/existing, then such a belief stems solely, (oun implied), from blind-faith alone.
On the other hand scientific matters are based purely on facts of it can't be proved it is not true even of every finger points to it being true...
The burden of proof rests with supporting facts claimed in evidence, not with attempting to 'prove' that something
isn't true. That's not logic; it's irrationality. Have you now decided to present conclusive evidence of your inability to reason accurately?
... no atom has ever been created from scratch...
That depends upon what you mean by "from scratch" in this context. Cooks prepare meals "from scratch" yet none of them created the atoms from which the scratch ingredients are assembled. Does this mean that subatomic colliders cannot "create atoms from scratch" too?
You still can't and never will be able to provide that info yet you conviently forget about that when you point your fingers at the Believers...
The only "finger" pointed at religious believers/adherents is the one repeatedly requesting that they provide evidence to support their religious contentions, (which they've first posted and
subsequently were contended). Given that no such evidence has been produced in the 2,000-some-odd years since religious adherents have been contending such unsupported beliefs, it may be that another "finger" gets raised as well.