You have committed an Argumentum ad ignorantiam here by claiming something must be false simply because it hasn't been proven true.
Not quite. If the premise of an argumentum ad ignorantiam is an appeal to ignorance" (where "ignorance" stands for: "lack of evidence to the contrary"), my contention that the assertion responded to lacks evidence and is therefore false does not confer 'truth' upon the claim contended. While it is technically correct that a lack of evidence does not itself falsify a claim, that lack does emphasis that the claim has no evidential basis, (which is what I normally reply when specious claims are made so, good catch there).
Furthermore, your posting in this thread can be nothing more than a hateful attempt at the OP (even if you didn't reply to them directly).
Now you're simply attributing things to my posts which are not explicitly or implicitly inherent in them. These are instead, your perceptions, (which, as the one who posted concerning the ineffectiveness of 'prayer', I can contend are entirely subjective and not based in objective evidence).
I am not the most proud man, but even I wouldn't kick someone when they were down, and I sure as hell wouldn't spit on them if they begged for a drink of water.
Since there was neither a literal nor, figurative "kick" or 'spitting on' the OP, such characterizations are not accurate. What was posted instead was the direct implication that some solution other than 'prayer' be sought as being more effective, (and without knowing the specifics which were not posted, only a general suggestion could be made).
Why don't you go find any sick puppies or kittens to kick around if you feel so insecure to have to prove yourself.
The assumption that I'm "insecure" is merely an unsubstantiated 'flame' which lacks supporting evidence of it's veracity. I happen to like puppies and kittens and am unlikely to consider kicking either around. While you're erecting strawmen to knock over, consider cease beating your wife too.