At this point it's the matter of your "supported, unbiased, non-specious, always factual" views ...
As I stated, I endeavor to provide support, (whether evidentiary or, a logical reasoning process), for any refutations made. If you were to go back and reread the posted exchanges, you'll notice that my replies are in _response_ to specious assertions/claims made.
...along with others' "unsupported, biased, specious, not factual, non-accepted opinions" in regards to your shutting them down, not choosing to listen to their further reasons (because they aren't reason to you)
They aren't "reason" using the definition of reason, (which isn't restricted to 'any excuse one wishes to throw out there'). This isn't according to some personal definition of reason that only I'm using. As previously stated, a process of debate was engaged in, (at least on my part), which opponents engaged in, (thus refuting your contention of "shutting them down").
which ultimately goads tempers, which then you can zero in on and question them on their attitudes.
The emotional responses of others are their own responsibility. I don't often question others regarding their emotional attitudes since I preceive that as a personal matter.
Then when you start appearing in the very same threads, with some of the same posters who have gotten upset and frustrated, and you continue with the same treatment, and also making unrelated remarks about their wording or maybe not understanding something, that starts getting a little creepy, feeling as if they're being stalked, and/or bullied. Somebody is going to have had enough of it and turn you in.
Your characterization is false, no unrelated remarks were made, (the replies made were directly-related to the context of previous remarks). Once again, replying to any participant in any thread on these forums does not constitute "stalking". This is especially true when several threads exist wherein the false accuser was not replied to. However, continued false accusations of "stalking" will not be tolerated as a "point of view". You keep make this false accusation and I'll keep proving, (with substantive evidence), that you're a liar. If you want to take your lying to the level of Admin involvement, be assured that your one-side 'opinions' will be met with factual evidence. Although I could consider your continued false accusations as "bullying" or "harassment", I choose not to.