daily Bible verse

[falcon9]

YOU took JediJohnnie's comments and your comments (your question) and then deliberately left off what he was responding to ...

That's because he didn't quote what he was responding to in full.  I merely noted this by sardonically turning his specious trolling back at him.  All context is available, (that poster alternately pretends to have posts on and off "ignore" and didn't quote previous context).

No excuse - you did it and were facetious about it - you deliberately did it.

While there is no excuse for your facetious lying, (which you deny, in the face of archived evidence in your own words), your lies were as deliberate as the facts I posted.

[jcribb16]

YOU took JediJohnnie's comments and your comments (your question) and then deliberately left off what he was responding to ...

That's because he didn't quote what he was responding to in full.  I merely noted this by sardonically turning his specious trolling back at him.  All context is available, (that poster alternately pretends to have posts on and off "ignore" and didn't quote previous context).

No excuse - you did it and were facetious about it - you deliberately did it.

While there is no excuse for your facetious lying, (which you deny, in the face of archived evidence in your own words), your lies were as deliberate as the facts I posted.

You're lying, falcon9, and it's there for everyone to see.  Stop with your pitiful and ridiculous excuses - they aren't working.  You slipped up and can't handle being held accountable.

[falcon9]

You're lying, falcon9, and it's there for everyone to see. 

On the contrary, there is no evidence to support such a claim while there are archived posts in which you've lied, as supporting evidence of my contention.

[jcribb16]

I'd much rather be a "bummer" for my Lord ...

Since no valid or substantive evidence has been presented for the existence of any such "lord", nothing that follows from that false premise has any rational meaning.

... than a "bitter" person who mocks others, hatefully ...

Characterizing the opposition to blind superstitious faith as "bitter" is irrational since the line of reasoning supporting such opposition has been delineated several times already, (and gone 'unseen' by those blinded by faith).  

And my Lord is no demon -  

I stated that some 'believe' they're possessed by a "spirit"; that's supposedly what daemons do too, (if half of the same superstitious nonsense is believed, so is the remainder).  The aspects of belief in a supernatural egregore are interchangeable for "daemons", (look up the older meaning of "daemon", if wished).

Why are you so annoying? Why do you even waste your time posting in this thread? Do you make money on here, or do you just use the forum to annoy people?

I'm guessing the latter.

Just for the record, again, since falcon9 can't admit he goofed - here is what JediJohnnie replied to Andrew09 (see above in red and blue.) Next part is coming in a separate response.

[jcribb16]

Would you characterize yourself as an ignorant troll or, more self-deluded and faith-blinded?

JediJohnnie [/color]link=topic=30996.msg634553#msg634553 date=1351971451]
I'm guessing the latter.

They're both accurate, so it was a toss-up.

Now, here is the next part - notice falcon9 asked a name-calling question of JediJohnnie, and then used JediJohnnie's quoted answer to Andrew09, to make it appear that JediJohnnie was admitting to the name-calling word from falcon9. 

This is twisted context only being used at falcon9's advantage, with his habit of only quoting portions of someone's comments as he sees fit.  This is wrong and this time he blew it.

[falcon9]

This is twisted context ...

Indeed, yours does twist/omit context - here's the intact reply:

Why are you so annoying?

Why does your religiously-biased 'opinion' find opposition to blind faith and superstitious belief to be "annoying"? <--rhetorical question
Additionally, why do you find it necessary to 'annoy' others with your religious superstitions when they are, presumably, private beliefs?

Why do you even waste your time posting in this thread if you don't believe in the Lord?

On the contrary, I don't consider opposing the same superstitious religious beliefs which instigated the crusades, the inquitions, the witch hunts and the atrocities of forced cultural suppressions/assimulations to be a waste of time.  I do consider such self-deceptive, self-blinding religious beliefs to be a major waste of time and oppose it.  Since others have the same option to oppose superstitious religious beliefs as those who choose to propagandize them by posting such, your question becomes an attempt to censor opposing viewpoints.  That isn't going to work.

Do you make money on here, or do you just use the forum to annoy people?

Each of your specious questions are inherently biased by your superstitious beliefs.  Yes, I make money on FC, (as if that's any of your business - be concerned about your own earnings).  The reasons for posting to the FC forums are not defined by religious adherents and range from 'because I choose to do so' to receipt of a forum posting bonus every month for about two years so far.

[jcribb16]

This is twisted context ...

Indeed, yours does twist/omit context - here's the intact reply:

Why are you so annoying?

Why does your religiously-biased 'opinion' find opposition to blind faith and superstitious belief to be "annoying"? <--rhetorical question
Additionally, why do you find it necessary to 'annoy' others with your religious superstitions when they are, presumably, private beliefs?

Why do you even waste your time posting in this thread if you don't believe in the Lord?

On the contrary, I don't consider opposing the same superstitious religious beliefs which instigated the crusades, the inquitions, the witch hunts and the atrocities of forced cultural suppressions/assimulations to be a waste of time.  I do consider such self-deceptive, self-blinding religious beliefs to be a major waste of time and oppose it.  Since others have the same option to oppose superstitious religious beliefs as those who choose to propagandize them by posting such, your question becomes an attempt to censor opposing viewpoints.  That isn't going to work.

Do you make money on here, or do you just use the forum to annoy people?

Each of your specious questions are inherently biased by your superstitious beliefs.  Yes, I make money on FC, (as if that's any of your business - be concerned about your own earnings).  The reasons for posting to the FC forums are not defined by religious adherents and range from 'because I choose to do so' to receipt of a forum posting bonus every month for about two years so far.

I showed exactly what happened in context, including using JediJohnnie's response against him.  Just own up and get over it and move on.  Nobody's perfect - we know that already.

[falcon9]

This is twisted context ...

Indeed, yours does twist/omit context - here's the intact reply:

Why are you so annoying?

Why does your religiously-biased 'opinion' find opposition to blind faith and superstitious belief to be "annoying"? <--rhetorical question
Additionally, why do you find it necessary to 'annoy' others with your religious superstitions when they are, presumably, private beliefs?

Why do you even waste your time posting in this thread if you don't believe in the Lord?

On the contrary, I don't consider opposing the same superstitious religious beliefs which instigated the crusades, the inquitions, the witch hunts and the atrocities of forced cultural suppressions/assimulations to be a waste of time.  I do consider such self-deceptive, self-blinding religious beliefs to be a major waste of time and oppose it.  Since others have the same option to oppose superstitious religious beliefs as those who choose to propagandize them by posting such, your question becomes an attempt to censor opposing viewpoints.  That isn't going to work.

Do you make money on here, or do you just use the forum to annoy people?

Each of your specious questions are inherently biased by your superstitious beliefs.  Yes, I make money on FC, (as if that's any of your business - be concerned about your own earnings).  The reasons for posting to the FC forums are not defined by religious adherents and range from 'because I choose to do so' to receipt of a forum posting bonus every month for about two years so far.

I showed exactly what happened in context...

No, you omitted the intervening exchange of replies which lead to the later string of replies.

[jcribb16]

This is twisted context ...

Indeed, yours does twist/omit context - here's the intact reply:

Why are you so annoying?

Why does your religiously-biased 'opinion' find opposition to blind faith and superstitious belief to be "annoying"? <--rhetorical question
Additionally, why do you find it necessary to 'annoy' others with your religious superstitions when they are, presumably, private beliefs?

Why do you even waste your time posting in this thread if you don't believe in the Lord?

On the contrary, I don't consider opposing the same superstitious religious beliefs which instigated the crusades, the inquitions, the witch hunts and the atrocities of forced cultural suppressions/assimulations to be a waste of time.  I do consider such self-deceptive, self-blinding religious beliefs to be a major waste of time and oppose it.  Since others have the same option to oppose superstitious religious beliefs as those who choose to propagandize them by posting such, your question becomes an attempt to censor opposing viewpoints.  That isn't going to work.

Do you make money on here, or do you just use the forum to annoy people?

Each of your specious questions are inherently biased by your superstitious beliefs.  Yes, I make money on FC, (as if that's any of your business - be concerned about your own earnings).  The reasons for posting to the FC forums are not defined by religious adherents and range from 'because I choose to do so' to receipt of a forum posting bonus every month for about two years so far.

I showed exactly what happened in context...

No, you omitted the intervening exchange of replies which lead to the later string of replies.

No, I did not.  Poor guy - you slipped up and know it.  You cannot stand to be caught in something you did facetiously, and are doing your very best to twist and turn things even now, to your advantage.  It's not working, sir.  Keep wasting your time typing your excuses - they're to no avail.

[jsmith96]

Psssssssssss...Psssssssss...Pssssssss... (see pest control thread; http://www.fusioncash.net/forum.php?topic=47297.0 )
This is a Daily Bible Verse thread, is it not God Bless You All &..............

[falcon9]

No, I did not.   

It doesn't do any good for you to misrepresent the actual sequence of posts since they're archived, (which means the moderators know where you lied in any false reports in this regard).

[falcon9]

Psssssssssss...Psssssssss...Pssssssss...  This is a Daily Bible Verse thread, is it not  

What this is not is an exclusive thread for unopposed religious propagandizing.

[jcribb16]

No, I did not.   

It doesn't do any good for you to misrepresent the actual sequence of posts since they're archived, (which means the moderators know where you lied in any false reports in this regard).

Nope, you are the lying one with this. 

[falcon9]

No, I did not.   

It doesn't do any good for you to misrepresent the actual sequence of posts since they're archived, (which means the moderators know where you lied in any false reports in this regard).

Nope, you are the lying one with this. 

The moderators can read, they don't need to take the dubious 'word' of a xtian zealot for this.

[jcribb16]

No, I did not.   

It doesn't do any good for you to misrepresent the actual sequence of posts since they're archived, (which means the moderators know where you lied in any false reports in this regard).

Nope, you are the lying one with this. 

The moderators can read, they don't need to take the dubious 'word' of a xtian zealot for this.

Yes, indeed they can read, falcon9.  They can read your twisted context of that issue.  Not only that they can read how you are assuming that they feel like you do towards me, as a Christian, and therefore, only accept your lying words.  You, sir, are pushing the buttons, for assuming too much with the moderators - kind of like inferring that you have an "insider connection" with them.  Even your bias against Christians is coming through with this particular issue...