daily Bible verse

[jcribb16]

Overlooking the facetiously made comments and allowed opinions included ...

Which includes the ones based solely on blind religious faith, (otherwise, your remark was specifically biased against reason and implicitly for superstitious irrationality).

No, it was specifically against hate speech, mocking deliberately, and the constant badgering of believers, just because they choose to believe in God.  You are having a difficult time looking at this objectively. 

[falcon9]

Overlooking the facetiously made comments and allowed opinions included ...

Which includes the ones based solely on blind religious faith, (otherwise, your remark was specifically biased against reason and implicitly for superstitious irrationality).

No, it was specifically against hate speech, mocking deliberately, and the constant badgering of believers, just because they choose to believe in God. 

Then it is biased, as contended since these "bible verses" threads began with content which other non-xtians consider to be offensive, self-righteously presumptive, intellectually insulting, bereft of logic and full of irrational religious claims, (sans evidence).

You are having a difficult time looking at this objectively. 

Your biased nonsense contains no objectivity whatsoever.  Though your campaign to "badger" with irrationality continues to demonstrate that the basis of religious faith isn't objective, rational, sane or reasonable and instead embodies the opposite of each of those qualities.

[vp44]

Sometimes is it uplifting to read some of the verses here. Especially if you were having a not so good day. God can sure lift some spirits. 

[falcon9]

God can sure lift some spirits. 

That's a false attribution because it's based on a blind faith-based assumption, (sans any evidence).  That makes such an assertion an unfounded claim and specious religious proselytization.

[JediJohnnie]

I know you are on pins and needles waiting for him to respond to it.

Not true, even if meant facetiously.
 

If he has you on "Ignore," you could post several times, and he still wouldn't see it.

Here's something you haven't taken into account though; he has alternately claimed to have put my posts on ignore, taken them off ignore, put them back on ignore, ad nauseum.  His claims have no validity and are rountinely disgarded.
 

I wanted to see if you would actually respond to the question, but as usual, answering a question is beneath your dignity.  

On the contrary, I was subtlely indicating the answer was none of your concern.

Right.  Because you will not answer to anyone you consider "beneath your dignity and intelligence."  We got it.  *Small violin playing...*

It does kinda make you wonder why someone would waste time posting to someone who won't even see it.

Still,the "ignore" function is an incomplete science.I end up reading more of Falcon's posts than I care too,due to people constantly quoting him/her/it.

I have at rare times,I admit,took him off ignore to see him dodge,duck and dance around questions posed to him.Which is oftimes amusing.

[falcon9]

I know you are on pins and needles waiting for him to respond to it. 

Not true, even if meant facetiously.

If he has you on "Ignore," you could post several times, and he still wouldn't see it. 

Here's something you haven't taken into account though; he has alternately claimed to have put my posts on ignore, taken them off ignore, put them back on ignore, ad nauseum.  His claims have no validity and are rountinely disgarded.

It does kinda make you wonder why someone would waste time posting to someone who won't even see it.

Since you've previously lied about using the ignore function, (not a "science" but, a software function), and because I'd previously indicated that 'ignored' posts are still posted for anyone else to see, your own words contradict themselves.  Again.

Still,the "ignore" function is an incompleate science.I end up reading more of Falcon's posts than I care too,due to people constantly quoting him/her/it.

Those posters could be put on ignore too.  Put everyone who doesn't agree with your ignorance on ignore! Have you tried putting your own posts on ignore yet?

I have at rare times,I admit,took him off ignore to see him dodge,duck and dance around questions posed to him.Which is oftimes amusing.

Which means you've lied about ignoring posts, 'un-ignored' them to try getting an insult in edgewise, and put them back on ignore because you're too cowardly to have the courage of your convictions.  That's not being a fanatical zealot crusader for a 'non-g-d'; it's you being an immature monkey throwing feces in a zoo.  I do not "dodge, duck or dance" around any challenge like you fundie xtians demonstrably have done.  There being no valid evidence, (unedited archived posts), to support your specious claims, you must be providing additional evidence that you're a liar.

The previous "crusaders" lied too so, you may have a chance at it still - except for that cowardice aspect of yours.

[JediJohnnie]

Another thing that's amusing is how falcon feels the need to change the topic name every time he posts,like a three year old demanding his own way.

[falcon9]

Another thing that's amusing is how falcon feels the need to change the topic name every time he posts,like a three year old demanding his own way.

It's not amusing how you keep supplying evidence that you're an idiot.  If the content post has nothing to do with the thread it's in, (like this one), changing the topic name - just for that post - doesn't change the original thread title.  If you didn't still have the mental and emotional limitations of a two year old, you'd know that.

[remediagirl]

Proverbs 16:28
A troublemaker plants seeds of strife; gossip separates the best of friends. (NLT)

[falcon9]

Proverbs 16:28
A troublemaker plants seeds of strife; gossip separates the best of friends. (NLT)

In that case, there is archived evidence of xtians on these forums engaging in what their book of superstitions admonishes against.

[remediagirl]

Proverbs 16:28
A troublemaker plants seeds of strife; gossip separates the best of friends. (NLT)

In that case, there is archived evidence of xtians on these forums engaging in what their book of superstitions admonishes against.

Human beings will make mistakes...no one is perfect.  

[Paulinha]

Good one

[JediJohnnie]

I'm still deep in the study of Romans which is why I've been posting many verses from it lately.


Romans 15:1-4

We who are strong ought to bear with the failings of the weak and not to please ourselves. Each of us should please our neighbors for their good, to build them up.For even Christ did not please himself but, as it is written: “The insults of those who insult you have fallen on me.” For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through the endurance taught in the Scriptures and the encouragement they provide we might have hope.


 

[falcon9]

Given that you rely upon weak blind faith, that isn't a strength and therefore, the "verse" does not apply to you - even in false hubris.

I'm still deep in the study of Romans which is why I've been posting many verses from it lately.

Romans 15:1-4
"We who are strong ..." 

[jcribb16]

Overlooking the facetiously made comments and allowed opinions included ...

Which includes the ones based solely on blind religious faith, (otherwise, your remark was specifically biased against reason and implicitly for superstitious irrationality).

No, it was specifically against hate speech, mocking deliberately, and the constant badgering of believers, just because they choose to believe in God. 

Then it is biased, as contended since these "bible verses" threads began with content which other non-xtians consider to be offensive, self-righteously presumptive, intellectually insulting, bereft of logic and full of irrational religious claims, (sans evidence).

You are having a difficult time looking at this objectively. 

Your biased nonsense contains no objectivity whatsoever.  Though your campaign to "badger" with irrationality continues to demonstrate that the basis of religious faith isn't objective, rational, sane or reasonable and instead embodies the opposite of each of those qualities.

Perhaps you should look in your own mirror and work on your own bias shortcomings before trying to discredit a Christian as irrational and having no objectivity.  You have no conception of the understanding inner workings of God, His Word, and what exactly faith in God is, admittedly by choice.  You are getting so ridiculous and pitiful with your rage against believers because they believe in God.  It's not for you to decide what's best with that - you mind your own business with it, as everyone else will mind their own.

You are coming across as outrageously prejudiced and judgmental - it's a shame it seems you appear to enjoy wallowing in it just to *seemingly satisfy "satan's" temptations and ruses.  You are making him extremely gleeful.  It won't stick though - his time is coming for his ruling, and then his ultimate final eternal punishment in the lake of fire, including his *followers and minions. 

(*Please note: I am NOT calling falcon9 a follower of satan - I said *seemingly.*)