daily Bible verse

[falcon9]

Says you, over and over........

Just as you xtians keep falsely attributing things, (with no supporting evidence), to a hypothetical supernatural egregore, over and over again.

[jcribb16]

Says you, over and over........

Just as you xtians keep falsely attributing things, (with no supporting evidence), to a hypothetical supernatural egregore, over and over again.

It doesn't interfere in your life, so it shouldn't bother you what Christians do.  It's not false to Christians. 

[falcon9]

It doesn't interfere in your life, so it shouldn't bother you what Christians do.  It's not false to Christians. 

By the same token, textual dissent doesn't "interfere" in your life either.  Rationally commenting on irrational attributions applies to religious and secular false attributions.

[jcribb16]

It doesn't interfere in your life, so it shouldn't bother you what Christians do.  It's not false to Christians. 

By the same token, textual dissent doesn't "interfere" in your life either.  Rationally commenting on irrational attributions applies to religious and secular false attributions.

By the same token, disrespectful remarks, intended to cut down the poster's joy of her knee replacement going well and her grandson coming back safely, while comforted by Psalm 91, is thoughtless to her as an individual.  Her remarks are not messing with you - you choose to come in this particular off-topic thread to harass.  Your remarks are cutting her down and once again, is thoughtless.

[jcribb16]

 

Psa 17:7-8
King James Version
"Show thy marvellous lovingkindness, O thou that savest by thy right hand them which put their trust in thee from those that rise up against them. Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings,"

Hope everyone has a sweet and special Sunday.       

[sdecaro558]

I'm curious...  Why KJV, when there are so many better translated versions out there?

[jcribb16]

I'm curious...  Why KJV, when there are so many better translated versions out there?

I use other versions occasionally.  KJV is just my preferred version.  When I was younger and first started reading the Bible, there were only a couple of other versions that were popular, like The Living Bible, and the NIV (New International Version.)  I had already delved into the KJV and memorized a lot, and I just really like the way it's worded.  But I use my other choices when I need a clarification, or if the verse I'm thinking of sharing seems to need the clarification for better understanding.  

Here's the NIV translation of Psalm 17:7-8:

"Show me the wonders of your great love,
    you who save by your right hand
    those who take refuge in you from their foes.
 Keep me as the apple of your eye;
    hide me in the shadow of your wings ."

[falcon9]

By the same token, disrespectful remarks, intended to cut down the poster's joy of her knee replacement going well and her grandson coming back safely, while comforted by Psalm 91, is thoughtless to her as an individual. 

That isn't "by the same token"; the "token" was the context of false 'deital' attributions, not a "cut down", (since there is no evidence linking the believed attribution to a hypothetical "deity").
 

Her remarks are not messing with you - you choose to come in this particular off-topic thread to harass.  Your remarks are cutting her down and once again, is thoughtless.

You keep trying and failing to make opposition to making false religious attributions a 'personal attack'.  Since such specious attributions being made sans evidence, (in this and other threads), pointing that out is neither 'harassing' nor "thoughtless cutting down".  Your false continued false characterizations of perceiving what isn't there through blind faith is a consistent inconsistancy.

“Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.”
-– Ambrose Bierce

[jcribb16]

By the same token, disrespectful remarks, intended to cut down the poster's joy of her knee replacement going well and her grandson coming back safely, while comforted by Psalm 91, is thoughtless to her as an individual. 

That isn't "by the same token"; the "token" was the context of false 'deital' attributions, not a "cut down", (since there is no evidence linking the believed attribution to a hypothetical "deity").
 

Her remarks are not messing with you - you choose to come in this particular off-topic thread to harass.  Your remarks are cutting her down and once again, is thoughtless.

You keep trying and failing to make opposition to making false religious attributions a 'personal attack'.  Since such specious attributions being made sans evidence, (in this and other threads), pointing that out is neither 'harassing' nor "thoughtless cutting down".  Your false continued false characterizations of perceiving what isn't there through blind faith is a consistent inconsistancy.

“Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.”
-– Ambrose Bierce

And you are rambling in circles, trying to make comebacks that look like comebacks, but are nothing more that stubborness and pride at thinking you must have the last word and the last disrespectful remark.   Lol, you are actually becoming amusing in your efforts to bring others down to what you consider "reality," but instead are making you look a tad foolish and ornery, with a drop of pouting.   Keep on - since it seems to make you happier, more content, and the sense of being more in control of others.                  I'll even give you a star for trying so hard all of the time:   

[JediJohnnie]

Galatians 6:7-9  Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.  Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.

[falcon9]

By the same token, disrespectful remarks, intended to cut down the poster's joy of her knee replacement going well and her grandson coming back safely, while comforted by Psalm 91, is thoughtless to her as an individual. 

That isn't "by the same token"; the "token" was the context of false 'deital' attributions, not a "cut down", (since there is no evidence linking the believed attribution to a hypothetical "deity").

Her remarks are not messing with you - you choose to come in this particular off-topic thread to harass.  Your remarks are cutting her down and once again, is thoughtless.

You keep trying and failing to make opposition to making false religious attributions a 'personal attack'.  Since such specious attributions being made sans evidence, (in this and other threads), pointing that out is neither 'harassing' nor "thoughtless cutting down".  Your false continued false characterizations of perceiving what isn't there through blind faith is a consistent inconsistancy.

“Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.”
-– Ambrose Bierce

And you are rambling in circles ...

If you believe that, you aren't reading the replies for content and are simply reverting to your own circular illogic, blinded by your faith.

[falcon9]

Galatians 6:7-9  Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked.  

Such a hypothetical supernatural entity can and has been "mocked".

See?  Your hypothetical entity has been "mocked" and has no response.

[longleggedgiraffe]

I dont beleive God is hypothetical at all. His presence is all around us. If you could just see it,you would be amazed! The worlds scenery,the food you eat, the car you drive. everything you see or posses was made possible by God!!!

[falcon9]

I dont beleive God is hypothetical at all.

Of course you don't however, it remains merely a belief and one with no substantive evidentiary basis, (that's why it's called "faith" and not "fact").

His presence is all around us.

No, that's a belief too and one without substantive evidentiary basis, (you'll note the recurring theme).

If you could just see it,you would be amazed! The worlds scenery,the food you eat, the car you drive. everything you see or posses was made possible by God!!!

The sheer hubris of attributing everything to some hypothetical religious egregore would be astounding were it not simply irrational.  Much like pointing to the exact same things and attributing them to being made possible by an 'invisible pink unicorn' instead, attributing such things, (sans substantive evidence, which does not include such insubstantive things as "belief/faith").

No one is stopping anyone from holding such specious beliefs, just as no one is stopping others from pointing out that they are specious, (due to the aforementioned lack of substantive and validly-attributible evidence).  In other words, what goes on inside your own head is your business; posting it publically makes it public business.

“Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.”
--– Richard Dawkins

[jcribb16]

By the same token, disrespectful remarks, intended to cut down the poster's joy of her knee replacement going well and her grandson coming back safely, while comforted by Psalm 91, is thoughtless to her as an individual. 

That isn't "by the same token"; the "token" was the context of false 'deital' attributions, not a "cut down", (since there is no evidence linking the believed attribution to a hypothetical "deity").

Her remarks are not messing with you - you choose to come in this particular off-topic thread to harass.  Your remarks are cutting her down and once again, is thoughtless.

You keep trying and failing to make opposition to making false religious attributions a 'personal attack'.  Since such specious attributions being made sans evidence, (in this and other threads), pointing that out is neither 'harassing' nor "thoughtless cutting down".  Your false continued false characterizations of perceiving what isn't there through blind faith is a consistent inconsistancy.

“Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.”
-– Ambrose Bierce

And you are rambling in circles ...

If you believe that, you aren't reading the replies for content and are simply reverting to your own circular illogic, blinded by your faith.

Oh, I take the time to read your outrageous, circular, and disrespectful remarks.  It's the least I can do to take time to read what you took the time to write and rewrite.   Though it gets a little tedious reading the same cut-downs time after time.  However, if I didn't read them, then I couldn't respond to those same ole same ole remarks.