Using only biased material does not prove a point; it just makes you look biased. Show me unbiased sources supporting your claims, or sources from the other side that will give some credibility towards your sources.
You calling them biased doesn't make them so.
Everything I listed about Margaret Sanger is FACT. It came from her mouth.
Every statistic listed about Post Abortion Syndrome were statistics formed from the mouths of the very people having abortions.
I quoted people who support eugenics.
A representative from Planned Parenthood taking a donation over the phone was recorded having said
she was excited to take a donation targeted for black people.
Just because the sites I referenced may be pro life doesn't change the
FACT that the people quoted, said those things.
So you can say my sources are not credible but saying so doesn't make it the case. How about if you disagree with me YOU go find what YOU consider to be unbiased sources. Amy posted a link and asked what we though of it. I have given my thoughts and
ample references and resources to back up what I am saying and what I believe to be the truth.
But if we were to use your sources as complete, unbiased truth, then their practice of eugenics is still "fine", because they are not forcing anyone to have an abortion
Nope they are not forcing anyone, they are just lying to them and telling them it's about their right to choose instead of telling them it's about them being unfit to breed. And subsequently laughing all the way to the bank for having successfully rid the world of another inferior human being. And that's not
fine no matter how many times you try to re word what you have said to make it sound
fine.
Dr. Clarence Gamble (of Proctor and Gamble fame) who had served as director of the Birth Control League and was appointed as the regional director of the South, sent Sanger a memo entitled “Suggestion for Negro Project,” where he warned that black leaders would likely see her strategy as a plot to exterminate the blacks. His solution? Enlist carefully selected black leaders to spread the word instead. They’d take the pill if it were from their own people and no one would suspect a thing!
In Sanger’s reply letter on Dec. 10. 1939, she agreed with his strategy. “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Facts: 1. The birth control campaigns like the Negro Project that gave birth to Planned Parent-hood heavily targeted minorities
2. Planned Parent-hood has placed the vast majority of their clinics in minority neighborhoods
The result? According to the
Guttmacher Institute,
black women are 5 times more likely than white women to have an abortion. Since Roe v Wade, 10% of the white race has been wiped out, but
28% of the black race has been wiped out. The black community makes up only 12% of the American population, but they have 36% of all the abortions–so
black babies are dying more than 3x as fast! By 2008, close to
14,000,000 black babies have been killed by abortion.I quoted this from the bloodmoney site, however the Guttmacher Institute through which these statistics came from is NOT a pro life or religious site. Look for yourself.
http://www.guttmacher.org/Go ahead and support abortion. Go ahead and support Planned Parenthood. In my opinion, supporting abortion is dismissing the countless testimonies of post abortion women crying out from experience and anguish that abortion is not the answer. In my opinion, supporting Planned Parenthood is supporting modern eugenics under the disguise of civil rights, and leading women to the clinics like cattle to the slaughterhouse.
You can disagree but I'm not going to let you dictate to me to present sources you find acceptable to convince you otherwise.