Falcon,
This thread "blog" has nothing whatsoever to do with your thread and what happened in there.
Do you mean, just like a d+d thread had nothing whatsoever to do with her coming into it just to spam it and troll and contribute nothing but 440 iterations of "chirp"?
"And now it's all right. It's OK.
And you may look the other way.
We can try to understand ..." - BeeGees
Stayin' AliveYou two have rubbed each other wrong before and you should keep your arguing with her in the thread you are speaking of.
Actually, we've had very little previous interactions on the forums, which is why her sudden decision to go a-trolling was unexpected. Doubtless you'd prefer that her trolling campaign be 'confined' to the thread she trolled however, since you don't get to dictate where other members post, that's a tough break for you.
It does NOT give you the perfect excuse or reason to come into this thread for the sake of "getting back" at another member.
As the previous posts in response to your fabrications show, (along with those of the other fabricators "bearing false witness" in this regard), those replies were
not some sort of "getting back" at someone else. They were
RESPONSES to her initial trolling. No "excuse" nor "reason" was provided by the troll other than her own words in reference to
starting her troll/calling out posts:
Quote from: loulizlee on Today at 07:38:44
"The post I made was real enough, however, and it must have hit a nerve"
This is trolling and spamming and is not fair to all of the others ...
You are correct that "loulizlee"
began "trolling and spamming" another thread, (which is somehow okay with you, since it didn't happen in
this thread at first?). Now you're getting all indignant when the troll is fed a spoonful of her own cooking? Wow, that's hypocrisy in action alright; totally disregarding concrete evidence in favor of supporting a xtian troll.
It is NOT bearing false witness.
The false characterizations concerning your associate's "trolling and spamming" another thread which were made in
this thread do appear to constitute "bearing false witness" according to the meaning of that phrase. Your own quoted false characterizations still appear down-thread and are achived; it's pointless to deny your own words now.