Forum Activity Bonus

[Annella]

I received my bonus also today.  To dmalsbury:  I know it's a bummer when things don't work out.  I can't tell you how many surveys I've done, and not credited for them.  However, you just gotta keep plugging away on it.  I usually have way over 30 posts a month, so I can choose the best ones with some "meat" to it, and that they "contribute" something to the thread. 

We still check your entire post history in addition to the three posts you submit.  Choosing "meaty" examples doesn't exempt the rest of your posts from meeting qualifications.

Not all posts have "meat" in them.  Not on purpose, but sometimes your just answering someone, and only a 3 or 4 words will suffice.  My post history has met qualifications so far.  I usually have around 200 posts a month.  I'm a regular poster.  Just got in the habit on my first day on board.  I do choose to put my best foot forward (so to speak) when filling out my "Forum Bonus Report" every month, and pick my better postings, even though 3/4 of them would qualify as "meaty" or acceptable.  I would never try to "slight" or deceive by just having 3 good posts in my 150-200 posts per month.

Unless your implying I'm doing so, or doing it wrong?  

[Administrator]

I received my bonus also today.  To dmalsbury:  I know it's a bummer when things don't work out.  I can't tell you how many surveys I've done, and not credited for them.  However, you just gotta keep plugging away on it.  I usually have way over 30 posts a month, so I can choose the best ones with some "meat" to it, and that they "contribute" something to the thread. 

We still check your entire post history in addition to the three posts you submit.  Choosing "meaty" examples doesn't exempt the rest of your posts from meeting qualifications.

Not all posts have "meat" in them.  Not on purpose, but sometimes your just answering someone, and only a 3 or 4 words will suffice.  My post history has met qualifications so far.  I usually have around 200 posts a month.  I'm a regular poster.  Just got in the habit on my first day on board.  I do choose to put my best foot forward (so to speak) when filling out my "Forum Bonus Report" every month, and pick my better postings, even though 3/4 of them would qualify as "meaty" or acceptable.  I would never try to "slight" or deceive by just having 3 good posts in my 150-200 posts per month.

Unless your implying I'm doing so, or doing it wrong?  

Didn't mean to imply anything.  From what I've seen your posts are indeed substantial.  By no means do we expect every single post to be long, it's just an issue when there's a LOT of very short posts.  My post was intended to make clear that we consider more than the 3 posts you select - that's it

[mattymatt79]

Nevermind, I'm dumb. Still set to pending, but that's fine.

[Annella]

I received my bonus also today.  To dmalsbury:  I know it's a bummer when things don't work out.  I can't tell you how many surveys I've done, and not credited for them.  However, you just gotta keep plugging away on it.  I usually have way over 30 posts a month, so I can choose the best ones with some "meat" to it, and that they "contribute" something to the thread.  

We still check your entire post history in addition to the three posts you submit.  Choosing "meaty" examples doesn't exempt the rest of your posts from meeting qualifications.

Not all posts have "meat" in them.  Not on purpose, but sometimes your just answering someone, and only a 3 or 4 words will suffice.  My post history has met qualifications so far.  I usually have around 200 posts a month.  I'm a regular poster.  Just got in the habit on my first day on board.  I do choose to put my best foot forward (so to speak) when filling out my "Forum Bonus Report" every month, and pick my better postings, even though 3/4 of them would qualify as "meaty" or acceptable.  I would never try to "slight" or deceive by just having 3 good posts in my 150-200 posts per month.

Unless your implying I'm doing so, or doing it wrong?  

Didn't mean to imply anything.  From what I've seen your posts are indeed substantial.  By no means do we expect every single post to be long, it's just an issue when there's a LOT of very short posts.  My post was intended to make clear that we consider more than the 3 posts you select - that's it

OK.....gotcha!