You spell the guy's name wrong in two separate posts and then say it's my fault for assuming that's his name? Alright.
I would expect someone who is passionate about exposing something as monumental as the US government building internment camps for citizens to not have "make profit" at the top of his list. Yes, I would expect he not charge $20 for a DVD if he was truly passionate about exposing these extraordinary goals of our government. A few bucks would be less suspicious, but still not to the point. I don't care what he charges, I just think it's funny so many people are getting rich as hell off these nonsense conspiracies.
But as you can infer, the money isn't really the issue. I have a problem with any overly biased material that tries to make outrageous claims or make use of incomplete truths and bad logic (Michael Moore for example). The issue is with the material and with the credibility, lack there of I should say, of these individuals (Franchi, Jones, Baldwin, etc.). They're off their rockers. They make outrageous claims -- that they know will sell films -- and proceed to back them up with twisted facts, logical fallacies, and just plain false accusations. Their "credentials" consist of them forming conspiracy groups and making up more conspiracy theories (these aren't credentials).
Their general premise in all these types of conspiracies is that the hundreds of individuals who make up the main parts of the US government are corrupt beyond description, that not a soul in the main branches of government has a desire to do good for the country or for the citizens, that they're something beyond human and are out solely to gain for themselves...and it's plain illogical nonsense. No other way to put it.
It may be true on a small scale, sure. Power corrupts. But to play it off like all 100 Senators, 435 House members, all the people directly involved with the executive branch, and so on are out to destroy citizens for their own gain at every single possible chance is, for lack of a better phrase, dumb as hell. The majority are, although always on the lookout for reelection, trying to do what they think is best for their constituents or for the country. On occasion they make mistakes, sometimes the checks and balances don't work as fully planned. It's part of having the form of government we have.
I won't download the film, as it's obviously illegal to do so. And I most certainly won't hand this guy $20 to watch some nonsense fantasy just so he doesn't have to get a job like the rest of us.