This topic is locked, no replies allowed. Inaccurate or out-of-date info may be present.

  • Print
Pages: 1

Topic: supercommittee  (Read 413 times)

ktheodos

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 5504 (since 2008)
  • Thanked: 88x
supercommittee
« on: November 21, 2011, 08:21:06 pm »
So...is anyone surprised by results? was it "setup"/doomed to fail? Was it even a "failure" so to speak? Thoughts??
Logged

falcon9

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Platinum Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 9741 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 2x
Re: supercommittee
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2011, 09:54:37 pm »
Quote from: ktheodos on November 21, 2011, 08:21:06 pm
So...is anyone surprised by results? was it "setup"/doomed to fail? Was it even a "failure" so to speak? Thoughts??




I get the distinct impression that it was a political compromise, intended to fix the blame rather the the problem.  So basically, same stuff - different day.
Logged
One can lead a horse to water however, if one holds the horse's head under, that horse will drown.

             

mgint

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Gold Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 3198 (since 2009)
  • Thanked: 34x
Re: supercommittee
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2011, 06:45:33 am »
just another feeble attempt at leadership and kicking problems down the road no leadership from either party.
Logged

GramPolly3

    US flag
    View Profile
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350 (since 2010)
  • Thanked: 1x
Re: supercommittee
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2011, 07:15:42 am »
Not necessarily a set-up. More like a chance for them to show the country whose interests they favor. And they failed. I expected it. To put the defeat of the man in the WH above the interest of the country is treasonous in my opinion.
Logged
  • Print
Pages: 1